This is part 4 of my series on this surprisingly popular topic. In this post I shall explore another aspect of the issue:
Is an average stable marriage worth it?
In a previous era, an average marriage might not have been such a bad deal. Given the pressures on women to remain married, lack of jobs for women, poor contraceptive choices etc, a reasonably stable dynamic equilibrium might have formed making a somewhat stable society possible. Things have changed a lot since then..
Today there are no real constraints on a woman’s ability to walk out of a marriage. If anything, there is a lot of encouragement to do so. These sources of encouragement include friends, family, the “law enforcement” and “judicial” system, media and the zeitgeist. Moreover unlike previous eras there are no negative consequences for walking out of a marriage, heck.. we, as a society, reward women who walk out.
Evolution is driven by possibilities, not by any intrinsic design. All the babble about evolutionary psychology, alpha, beta etc is meaningless because we never had anything approaching currently available possibilities in our recorded history. There is no usable precedent, and therefore we cannot model our system to predict the future to any usable accuracy. The best we can say is: de-evolution usually fails (extinction), and even if ‘successful’ the results are atrociously bad. I would bet on extinction as a more likely outcome of human de-evolution, given our dependence on complex artificial systems to survive, widespread dissemination of weapon technology and an orgy of mutual recrimination.
Anyway, back to topic on hand. Our current social system encourages and abets selfish behavior by married women, while punishing married men for the slightest apparent transgression (real or imaginary). Moreover the zeitgeist pushes a belief that every woman will get a man who can pass all 50 points on her list, and then pass 50 points on another list (which may have different requirements than the first). Men who point out the absurdity of this situation are labeled as misogynistic, “not good enough”, “losers” etc. It just happens that a significant minority of men can see the absurdity.
In our system, friends and family of a married woman encourage her to find a better deal, regardless of the effect of age on a womans looks. Indeed,friends and family who do not encourage married women in that direction are seen as ignoring for her “best interests”. The attitude towards husbands is: Are you not lucky to be getting some shitty sex with a lot of attitude, when I could get a better deal and destroy your life?
The effects of legislation, non-legislative regulations, law enforcement and the judicial system on marriage are truly chilling. However many hubris ridden white men support the parasitic law enforcement and judicial system . They do so because they believe that the system might hurt some darkies more than them. While that was true for a time, parasites outgrow their old hosts (minorities) and have to move on to more numerous hosts (whites) to keep up their rate of growth.
The “judicial” system is a dysfunctional entity that protects the elite, in the best of times. Today it is dysfunctional to a level where it plainly obvious, even to the brainwashed masses. Most systems can survive some loss of faith, but no system can be functional if it is seen to consistently act in bad faith.
The legislative and non-legislative regulations created by our politicians and bureaucrats are a sight to behold. I have no hope that they will see the light of reason because it is more profitable and ego-boosting to abuse power. It is also unlikely, and undesirable, to reverse universal suffrage for reasons that I will explain in future posts. Given this set of conditions, it is best that we allow this monstrosity to meet its logical conclusion.
The media and our zeitgeist find it very profitable to cater to women’s vanity. Women receive money from sources as diverse as from jobs, alimony, child support payments and generally acting in bad faith. While many blame the media, I see them as businessmen trying to maximize their profits. While their actions feed into the pathology, they did not start it.
In the end, we have to look at the twin roots of this pathology. The first one- technology and its secondary, tertiary effects did play a role in facilitating the process. However the second reason- white men playing white knights to their women, because “white women are the best, and deserve the best” is what really got us here. It is peculiar that most white men do not like to see it that way.
On another note, what harm is done to the social fabric by easily available legalized drugs, regardless of their potency or ability to create physical dependence? When is the last time an opiate or cocaine addict hurt you, other than to make money for buying a drug which would cost a fraction of the current cost if they were legal? I will also point out that it is costlier to incarcerate people than put them in public housing with all the cheap legalized drugs they can ingest. A quick funeral is cheaper than answering a few 911 calls. However this is the subject of a future series of posts.