Archive

Archive for January 13, 2010

Self Shots, GPS Enabled Smartphones and Data Mining

January 13, 2010 12 comments

I have had some reservations about writing this post, but the more I thought about it.. the more it became obvious that it should be written, as the implications are staggering. I had thought of this possibility the first time I used a iPhone over a year ago.

First an introduction of the terms:

Self-shots are an extension of the normal attention seeking behavior of, young and now older, women in which they either take pictures of themselves in various states of undress or performing sexual acts. These photos are often sent to their sexual partners by multimedia texting, e-mail or other electronic means.

GSP Enabled Smartphones such as the iPhone can take take fairly decent pictures, often with embedded GPS and other data (EXIF). They also help users send them to others, and post them to online sites more easily than traditional cellphones.

Data mining is the process of extracting patterns from data from databases to transform it into information. Whether you tracking people’s residence history, criminal records etc.. you are using data mining.

Anyway, self shots of undressed girls have been a staple of internet boards in the last 5 years. However, by and large, they could not be easily identified or located unless they chose to tell or their ex- was mad at them.

The iPhone and other GPS enabled phones (and even some cameras) have changed that situation. Now it is possible to extract a lot of information from the non-picture part of such picture files. The information accessible includes not only the GPS co-ordinates of that picture, but also fun facts like the real date/ time it was taken (and there are ways to interrogate even more information out of the picture).

Google earth and streetview makes it is possible to have a look at the location and house they were shot in. A little further data mining can easily tell you even more about it’s occupants, which can then be cross referenced with social networks. You see where I am going.

I see a future, very soon, where you could use the cell-phone number of a girl to search for self-shot pictures of her at ‘gray’ information sites. Given the decreasing cost of data storage, access, transmission and computing power combined with the increased use of smartphones, the possibilities are mind boggling.

Given that a significant minority of girls have sexted, and this trend can only go up (for reasons that male readers understand well) it may one day be possible to just use a normal picture of the girl’s face, name or telephone number (or it’s future equivalent) to see how she looks like undressed or giving head. Since social shame is no longer operational, the future looks bright (depending on your outlook). It also helps that smartphones are cheaper and more widespread than even a year ago.

In case you were wondering, most people who use smartphones like to add location information to their pictures and therefore it is unlikely that geotagging will be disabled. In many cases people are also too lazy to turn it on and off as desired.

Comments?

Here are some examples- iPhone GPS Exif Data Extraction and Extrapolation contains NSFW pictures

Categories: Ape Mind, Dystopia, Escorts

Google and Chinese Delusions: 01

January 13, 2010 10 comments

Most of you must have read about Google’s problems with the Chinese “system”. This post uses that event as an example to illustrate what is wrong with the Chinese and indeed the Asian way of doing things. I am not suggesting that western ways are better, just less screwed up. Let me first define what I mean by the Asian way. The ‘Asian way’ refers to cultural attitudes, behaviors and mindsets seen in east Asian people. So I would consider Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Taiwanese people and even some SE Asians to have a shared way of looking at the world. Other groups in Asia, such as Indians, Arabs, non-Arab middle easterners, Turks etc have their own issues. But back to the problem at hand..

I define the Asian ‘way’ as:

1. Civilizations with a lot of traditions and homogeneity, but lacking any social conscience and altruism. (compared to some European countries).
2. Societies that use rigid rules, hierarchies and not personal profit (gain) as a motive to support order. It is about scaring people with the specter of loss than encouraging them with the reasonable hope of gain. (It works in the short-term, then it breaks down).
3. Societies that do not often promote or listen to people based on competence, but rather prefer the advice of ‘wise’ old idiots or connected people. (Not unlike the english class or american wasp/ ivy-league system).
4. Discourage true innovation, but encourage specialization into repetitive mindless work. (Toyota makes great cars but they could not have invented the concept, and not because they were dumb).
5. Place excessive attention on your precise place in the hierarchy, combined with hereditary hierarchies and the tendency to hoard money- a truly nasty combination (Why would people work for the common good, if they have poor social mobility and everyone is trying to snuff out everyone else).
6. Do not like dissent, and believe it can be controlled, with hilarious and lethal results when stuff finally flies.(Read Chinese History)
7. Often incapable of adapting to new thinking, but can readily adapt name/ dress etc. (Japanese culture and custom versus dress and lifestyle, same for China and similar countries).

While each of these flaws is also present in other groups, it is their combination and expression in a people who believe three more ideas that seals their fate.

Those three ideas are:

1. Belief in their cleverness and unwillingness to cooperate with others for any extended period.
2. A worldview shaped almost exclusively by zero sum thinking, manifesting itself as mercantilism. Also believe in an unchanging world.
3. An unwillingness to think through their actions. Ironically many of these civilizations boast they can do that, when they only have 2000+ years of stagnation to show for it.

While these civilizations can become prosperous they can only do so if they have a host, that is willing to play their mercantile games. Once the host dies or breaks the parasitic feeding, the components of the parasite start fighting each other and reduce themselves to poverty or stasis.

Consider Google and China.. It’s experience in that country is hardly uncommon, infact it is the norm. However most western companies tolerate that because they believe that the chinese will change and they want to stay in that market. However short of multiple tungaska like events, they will not. It took carpet firebombing of Japanese cities + 2 nukes to partially westernize them.

You see, the Chinese believe that somebody else will buy their stuff in increasing amounts forever.

They seem to ignore that the money and debts they accept are and will be uncollectable.

Most asian cultures save a lot of money because they mistrust each other and will not support a working social welfare system. But saved or hoarded money does not create jobs or innovation. While saving money might have a place in societies before the industrial era, post-industrial societies can only function with almost zero savings or indeed a deficit. Most people in post-industrial societies do not have jobs that are productive or essential, they merely circulate money to maintain social stability and channel money into innovative endeavours. Ever wonder why japan has been in recession since the early 1990s?

However the Asian psyche cannot wrap itself around this concept. I will post another one in this series soon.

As for China becoming a superpower.. Not in this Incarnation.

Do You See the Problem: 02

January 13, 2010 1 comment

A primer to a problem I will discuss in some future posts:

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 106 other followers