Random Thoughts: 8
Of late I have started reading posts by some PUAs that game gives false hope to many men. Some ex-PUA posts go on to suggest that most “normal” women are not affected by game. Others imply that most men cannot really learn game, and being “alpha” is genetic etc.
I am fairly objective as far as game is concerned in that buying sex is my choice. I have no interest in impressing some stupid cunt in order to gave sex with her. Having said that, being an asshole is the easiest way to get laid, even if you are of the obnoxious type. Virtually any method beats the conventional socially approved way of dating women.
Pedestalling woman to get sex (or treating her nicely) is worser than any other way to get sex, because no woman will ever truly reciprocate your feelings. Even if she does not cheat on or divorce you, she still sees you as a tool that she can manipulate to get what she wants. Your wishes, safety, health or happiness are meaningless to her.
The reason why game works has little to do with routines, looks or body language. It works because it encourages men to hit on as many women as they can (numbers) and not suffer from “oneitis”. Even if every routine in game is worthless, increasing your approaches and treating women with a degree of contempt and disposability will guarantee you a higher probability of “free” sex than not doing so. It certainly helps if your actions fit a woman’s preconception of what is desirable.
The real impact of game, in my opinion, is removing any doubt from the mind of most men that women are made of sugar and spice. Destroying the favorable socially reinforced perception about women will be the biggest contribution of game, as they can get away with a lot of BS and abuse because many men believe that women are better human beings than them. In the past, most men realized that it was not true only after they had already been sucked into the whole legally enforced relationship scam. By spreading the word before most men make that mistake, game changes the probability of various outcomes.
I would distill game to a few concepts-
1. Approach a lot of women.
2. Approach with genuine confidence.
3. Never trust a woman.
4. Be amoral and opportunistic.
5. Never depend on one woman.
and
6. Treat women as they already treat men.
7. Do not apologize to a woman.
What do you think?
I agree for the most part.
Game has the additional benefit of motivating some guys who would otherwise never hit on girls, game or not. Thus, the AD&D-like formulae of the Mystery Method can appeal to a guy like myself-four-years-ago who “speak that language”. Tell such a guy the truth– that he just needs to hit on a ton of girls and face rejection and harden up– and he’ll never leave the house. If nothing else, game is a useful placebo.
read some tolle bro.
I think you undervalue how well good game models those traits which are attractive to women. The fact that most PUA materials are shit, and most aspiring PUAs haven’t mastered the arts in no way undermines the power of tight game. It’s more than just numbers and attitude.
—
Game is really about attitude and presentation, not routines. I am not saying that routines are useless, indeed they are good for gaining self-confidence.
I agree with your general concept. But some of the techniques do work. I’ve been experimenting with this on a married woman I know who seems up for an affair. Since I don’t care, I can experiment.
—
It is more about attitudes than techniques.
Anyway, she bought me a chocolate easter bunny. When I was a smart ass about it, she was e-mailing back and being flirty. But the next week when I said “Really, thanks, etc.” she got cold. So then I started in with being a smart ass again, and she got hot again.
—
It would makes no difference if you are in a relationship with her.
My feeling is that as we get older, we lose the natural narcissism we had as teens and that’s what women like, their protests to the contrary. We learn to be fair nd respectful and listen to our heads, not our bser instincts. See you back on Facebook.
—
Only women past 60 years old can be fair and respectful.
After I read your essays, I start feeling like Anakin Skywalker turning to the dark side.
–
you or me?
me. Your closer to emperor Palpetine.
–
I am flattered.
This is fitting to describe you
I know many women over the age of 65, and I am surprised at what decent people they are, especially compared to their younger counterparts. I don’t know if it’s because they belong to the pre-feminist generation or if it’s because they must be decent to get any attention.
–
Both! They grew up in a generation where they could not be total cunts.
I concur with you.
“The reason why game works has little to do with routines, looks or body language. It works because it encourages men to hit on as many women as they can (numbers) and not suffer from “oneitis”.”
Hogwash! Balderdash! Poppycock!
If all I did was approach with what I used to know, I’d start every convo with, “So, what’s your name? Where are you from? Come here often?” And be rejected so much that I’d lose all self-esteem and retreat to a WOW lifestyle.
It’s about knowing what to say and what to do. EVERYTHING to do with body language. Meek bodylanguage gets the bitch shield. Alpha doesn’t. (more or less)
Do you realize in the comments you actually contradicted yourself?
“Game is really about attitude and presentation, not routines. I am not saying that routines are useless, indeed they are good for gaining self-confidence.”
The “Come here often?” line is a routine. Game is about EFFECTIVE routines.