Enjoy some very bare Latinas, for a change..
Louis Vuitton’s Fall-Winter 2010 show cast, featuring its 50 or so models (including Elle Macpherson, Rosie Huntington-Whiteley, Bar Refaeli, Adriana Lima, Laetitia Casta, Lara Stone and Coco Rocha) without makeup–a veritable celebration of the fresh-faced look.
Click on the image for a full sized version.
Enjoy the double entendre..
In case you did not get it..
The ongoing collapse of white primacy in the west has spawned many denial based delusions. One such popular delusion is that the west will look like south and central america, where the well-off are white and poor people are mixed or non-white.
Sadly, people forget the reasons behind that artificial system..
The current primacy of whites in south and central america is not due to IQ or any other genuine advantage. It is due to the fact that the west has been using whites to rape, pillage and exploit those of mixed ancestry (or non-whites) for about 400 years.
First it was Spain (1500s-1700s), then European countries (1700-1900s) and now the USA (1900s-today). The white elite of these countries have been artificially propped up by successive white countries/ empires.
If you don’t believe what I just said, read about the history of direct and indirect white western interference in south and central america.
The west could pull it of because they, as a group, were growing for almost 400 years. A new western exploiter replaced the previous one, and so on.. This game, however, can be only played as long as the west was growing (and had a major technological edge), and therein lies the problem..
The west, specifically its white component, is not on the ascendant anymore.
Once the parasite can no longer support its outgrowths, they will die out (or be assimilated). I prefer the total assimilation scenario, as it would give us more mixed babes.
There is another less obvious reason for not being able to go the south american way.
The west is utterly dependent on a high velocity of money to exist. Societies like south and central america have very low velocities for money.However they also have far fewer systems that can go bust and pull the whole thing down. The west is also dependent on multiple interlocking systems (legal, social, economic) to achieve the living standard it enjoys. These multiple interlocking systems will fail if the velocity of money drops below a certain value. If these systems fail, we will get complete socio-economic unwinding.
It is always easier to survive a fall from 3 feet than 30 feet.
Many who mourn the ongoing demise of the west, cite ‘law and order’ as one of its greatest achievements. I disagree..
If anything, ‘law and order’ is one of the many factors that is destroying the west, not that I care.
The basic reasons behind having a society with ‘law and order’ include protection of life, property and apprehension + prosecution of offenders. While these reasons are eternally relevant, they carry within them the seeds of decay and destruction.
The reasons behind the chain of events can be understood with a few simple questions:
Who makes laws and for whom?
The answer is those with power for themselves, or their friends. Democratic systems are often spared from the worst abuses of greed, pettiness and megalomania, however they are not immune.
Look around you..
Laws are enforced for speeding, buying drugs, giving an individual touch to your house, shoplifting, not being able to pay usurious interest rates or fraudulent medical costs etc. Curiously the well off almost seem to get off much easier than the average person.
Laws are almost never enforced if your wealth manager scams you out of your life savings, your 401k is poorly managed, your bank decides to suddenly hike the interest rate on your credit card. Getting screwed over by any level of government, your employer, bank, lawyer or special interest group is actually legalized.
The law effectively protects sociopaths from retribution and allows them to exploit you. It seldom does what it is supposed to do, namely protect you from sociopaths.
But guess who foots the bill? YOU! It is overt and hidden taxes on your income that pay for the system.
You are the sucker who pays for your own oppression.
Most of you pay for your own oppression because it allows you to stroke your dick when a non-white person (or a poorer white person) runs afoul of the “law”. That is right- You are paying for someone to sodomize you every waking minute because you can get a few glimpses of someone else being sodomized.
Many whites makes claims about their superior IQ. I have no problems listening to such claims after they remove that dick out of their ass.
For many years, the ‘law and order’ apparatus did not sodomize whites as badly as non-whites, but times have changed. The lack of productive jobs combined with the cancerous nature of all bureaucracies have created a lot of job opportunities in the ‘law and order’ sector. Think of how many people are employed by that system..
- Lawyers who sue and defend you.
- Lawyers who create even more laws (through legislators) and even more complicated contracts.
- Bureaucrats to implement, “measure efficacy” and modify laws.
- “Enforcement” who would like nothing than fuck over decent people for fun..
Did I mention that increased spending in this area is hurting the system as a whole? Oh.. and YOU are paying for it, one way or the other (in case you did not get it the first time).
It worked as long as the west had a favorable demographic profile and technological edge. The party is now over but it seems as if nobody wants to believe that.
More in another part of this series..
As some of you know, the state of Arizona recently passed a law giving extraordinary powers to ‘law enforcement agencies’ to profile and arrest “illegals”. I can show you the futility (and ultimately counterproductive nature) of this exercise with stock pictures and highlighted text.
So here it goes.. Can you see what I see?
Janice Kay “Jan” Brewer (born September 26, 1944) is the 22nd and current Governor of the U.S. state of Arizona and is a Republican. She gave birth to three sons, one of whom died from cancer in 2007.
Joseph M. “Joe” Arpaio (born June 14, 1932) is an American law enforcement officer, and the sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona. Arpaio, who promotes himself as “America’s Toughest Sheriff,” has become controversial for his approach to operating the Maricopa County.
Arpaio married Ava Arpaio in 1958. Arpaio and his wife have two children and four grandchildren.
And here are the protesters. Note their age range. You have seen the future.. whether you like it or not.
Delusions come in many shapes, sizes and forms. The delusion of knowledge is one of the more popular, and I will say more that in another post. However the end effect of all delusions is the neglect of reality to the detriment of the deluded.
One of the most popular delusions in the blogosphere seems to the deterministic belief that genes are destiny. Now I should mention upfront that this secondary delusion require the primary delusion of knowledge. Essentially, only a completely characterized and understood complex system is even close to deterministic. Our current understanding of biological systems is pathetic at best, and we are therefore so far from determinism that it is not even funny.
The ‘genes are destiny’ meme arises from a misunderstood belief that one gene = one physiologically active protein. While one open reading frame of DNA (with or without interruptions) does indeed correspond to one expressed protein, the rest is far more complicated.
Evolution never designs or optimizes. It merely lets what is not successful, under the given conditions, to die.
Evolution by definition cannot converge on an optimal solution to a problem. It can stumble upon many almost optimal solutions. However since the conditions under which natural selection operates are themselves not constant, the genetic algorithm (evolution) cannot ever converge into one optimal solution.
This lack of optimization leads to one rather peculiar feature of biological systems. Almost all biological processes are driven by summation of multiple pathways.
Let me explain.. Imagine if a important process such as control of cell division, electrolyte regulation, nutrient handling, sexual reproduction was driven by a series of simple linear biochemical pathways where disruption of one part of a pathway would cause the output to collapse.
Given the number of DNA base pairs and rates of mutations, even one mutation in an obscure pathway could kill the organism. Given that mutations are a function of genome size (and DNA repair efficacy), only the simplest and most fecund organisms (bacteria) could ever use such simple point-to-point biochemical pathways. The rest (and even many bacteria) do things differently.
They use pathway summation.
Let me start with an easy example: Food intake and handling by humans.
Hunger in humans is controlled by a number of overlapping and cross-talking biochemical pathways. These include insulin, serotonin, dopamine and a host of other hormones and pathways. None of them by itself is important enough to kill if it malfunctions.
Insulin increases hunger mainly by causing hypoglycemia, but it has other more indirect effects on human biochemistry that make one crave more starchy and sugary foods. However two people do not gain the same amount of weight on a high-carb diet even if they are fairly similar to each other. Other systems such as brain serotonin and dopamine levels modulate the insulin hunger and craving signal.
It is well known that SSRI antidepressants cause weight gain by increasing serotonin levels, as do anti-psychotics by blocking dopamine (both in the brain). However neither have identical effects in a group of similar people, and it is well known that some people are far more sensitive to the weight gain caused by these medications.
The net result is that food intake and fat storage is the sum of a number of pathways that often interact with each other. The whole system is influenced by a number of hormones from insulin, serotonin, dopamine, testosterone, estrogen to even the availability of certain types of food and recreation facilities. There is therefore no magical gene or factor that is responsible for most of the obesity around you. Researchers can play all the statistical games they want, but the very organization of living systems works against such simplistic and religious beliefs.
The end result is that crucial biochemical systems are far more stable than would be otherwise possible. Such dynamic stability makes evolution possible, otherwise even one wrong turn could kill the mutation containing organism.
Think about it: Cystic fibrosis (not a very common disease) is the most common single gene linked disease and even it has some survival value in its sub-clinical forms.
Another example would be sexual functioning in human males.
To get a usable erection and achieve orgasm, many systems in the body have to work in synchrony. You require enough testosterone, enough dopamine, enough serotonin, increase in parasympathetic nervous system activity, decrease in sympathetic activity and a host of other things to work within the normal range. Frequently inadequate settings on one component can be functionally bypassed by increased activity of other components of the system, and most of such equilibration without your conscious knowledge.
The very fact that most men can get an erection and ejaculate when presented with an opportunity to be stimulated properly by a half-decent looking woman says volumes about the systems functional robustness.
Even significant physiological malfunction can be overcome by simple interventions. Low testosterone could be boosted by frequent exposure to receptive hot women (or you could just buy testosterone gel). While anxiety can cause both erectile problems and premature ejaculation, moderate amounts of alcohol and a degree of familiarity with the woman can alleviate them (as can PDE5 inhibitors). The adverse effects of SSRIs on sexual function can be reversed by not taking them (or taking dopaminergic antidepressants) and so on.. The reality is that unless you live in a hostile society which is full of all sorts of deprivations, you will do OK.
The hard-to-accept reality is that there are no perfect solutions or optimized physiologies, merely different types and degrees of malfunctions. However most malfunctions allow the overall system to work well enough to perform its function.
However the whole myth of human hierarchy is based on make-believe BS about innate superiority of some over the rest. Keep buying into that crap.. they require more suckers like you.
Does staring at hot naked women give men erections, even if they are of the “wrong” race? Isn’t the amount of blood flow in your penis a better gauge of a woman’s hotness than any scholarly analysis of her attributes?
I considered putting up some tasteful nudes of white, latina or asian women for this weekend post. However, I ultimately decided to piss off some “white uber alles” viewers a bit more..
So here are some more black hotties- artistic and tasteful nudity. It is fun to make some prejudiced men readjust their ‘pants’..
Enjoy the theme.. spanked gingers.
Here is a good one.. Enjoy!
Here is an interesting observation:
Though more than a few women know I use escorts, only a minority have ever been even mildly disapproving.
Most just go along. Heck more than a few want to know more. My guess- they realise that they cannot manipulate me with sex.
On one recent first date, I was fingering and essentially making out with a woman who fully knew about my escort habit. Did I mention that it was in a reasonably busy restaurant/bar.
I recently also had the opportunity to give a “non-paid” naughty gal a good spanking and fucking. It is amazing how quickly a woman will put on a schoolgirl outfit and go across your lap- if they know you can get sex from someone else. This was also a first date..
I have had other encounters in the past where I was essentially banging a girl on the first date, and she had a boyfriend. It is scary to think about it, but the very fact that I use escorts had dropped more panties “for free” than any other line I used.
The very idea that a non-repulsive guy had no problem getting good sex from an escort, has caused more gals to get naked and busy with me than any other line. I remember more than a few occasions where a woman was saying that she had a boyfriend, while she was helping me undress her. She was saying one thing, but her hands and later her mouth and pussy were busy doing something contrary to her original talk.
But you must mention your escort habit in a very casual and matter of fact manner. Something along the general lines of “I like sex with hot women, but have no time for BS and mind games and therefore prefer escorts, remember escorts not hookers”. If asked about risks, mention that it is always clean and safe (that is true!) + much less riskier than picking up women from the bar.
It is also peculiar that women who have sex with you after this line are very sweet as long as you are dominant. It is also almost guaranteed that a gal who will sleep with you after knowing about your escort habit will be more uninhibited. Essentially you get a sweet but naughty whore, who will do as she is told.
I guess that is not classical PUA game, but who cares?..
The Latest in the Wolfenstein Franchise:
It is almost 10 years to the day that I went to the dark side. Until that point in my life, I could have gone either way. I was in my very early 20s then.
However a series of events in 1999, destroyed any residual faith in human beings, especially women. Until then, I was cynical about women, but still preferred to get it for “free” rather than buy it. While I did get some sex, most of it was of relatively low quality and inadequate frequency.
Now some of you would say.. what about game and all that other stuff? Well, I was aware of that but was broke. It certainly did not help me that I was not white (or black) or handsome. I did dabble in buying sex from amateurs even then.. and that helped. I found that a decent steak dinner + booze often got me some action from a gal who was homeless (fresh not hardened). However that was survival sex.. it got the job done, but was not exactly nice.
Then I reached a point where I had really no income for a few months, and hence could not even get homeless gals to blow/ride me. It is also at that point, when nobody helped me. I think something snapped in me..
Around the end of 1999, I got a half decent job and some disposable income. However a series of rejections in that year changed me to the point where I could no longer imagine a relationship with any woman. From then on, it was all about sex.
While I have had some non-paid sex since then (a few women), the vast majority have been escorts. Between porn and escorts, things are good. I have had to finance my hobby creatively.. but it beats alimony + child support.
I have averaged 20-60 women per year since then.. the low number years had more repeats. The only way I would change this is through buying more sex. I have had escorts who were white, black, hispanic, asian, east-indian and all manners of mixtures. I have had threesomes.. and more.
I do not see myself ever having a relationship with a woman again, as sex with escorts gives you the control, quality and variety that no amount of game can ever bring you.
Was going to dark side worth it.. YES!
There I said it.. The vast majority of so called scientific research is fraudulent. This statement might seem surprising given my profession, but sadly it is true. But all is not lost and, in this article series, I will show you how to recognize scientific fraud. While each area of research is different, scientific fraud shares some common characteristics.
The first thing you should know – Certain fields are much less prone to fraud. ‘Hard’ sciences such as physics, chemistry, basic biological research are almost fraud free . The worst abuses you typically see in these areas involve exaggeration and some data manipulation.
Certain fields such as biomedical research and related areas have a very high percentage of fraud. Indeed, most of biomedical research is either outright fraudulent, obtained after extensive data manipulation or is irrelevant . However areas that involve extensive speculation and solipsism on scarce experimental data such as archeology, paleontology, eCONomics, psychology, climate modelling are the worst offenders. It is reasonable to assume that all research findings and interpretations in these areas are fraudulent (though some may be half-truths at best).
So why is it hard to commit extensive fraud in physics, chemistry and basic biology?
The reasons are:
1] It is very easy to cross-check experimental data, therefore most fraud are quickly exposed. Biomedical researchers can hide behind the BS of their experimental models being unique.
2] Most ‘hard’ science research is well funded, but grants are not extravagant. The incentive to defraud is far less than say biomedical research, where public drama and proclamations often mean the difference between big grants and nothing.
3] Hard sciences look down on unfounded and untestable speculation and extensive data interpretation. Biomedical sciences encourage it and areas like psychology, eCONomics, climate modeling revel in it.
4] In most areas of “research” people design “experiments” to validate their assumptions and beliefs. Hard sciences discourage such confirmatory ‘research’, because it is anathema to the very concept of scientific inquiry.
5] Personality cults are far more common in areas such as psychology, eCONomics and yes.. biomedical research. Too many have much vested in a particular world-view or explanation. Areas other than ‘hard’ sciences have more in common with religion than science.
Remember that the next time you read or hear about the “latest breakthrough” for a disease, “new facts or discoveries” in psychology, eCONomics or archeology.
More in the next part of this series.