A large percentage of men interested in ‘game’ are trying to use it to ultimately have a committed LTR with a woman. But is it even possible, let alone feasible?
1] Any technique of obtaining sex quickly, by design, selects for women who will drop their panties quickly. You are selecting for easy lays, as opposed to those with some self-control . If you can easily charm their clothes off, so can another guy.
2] The best sex almost always occurs in the first few months of a relationship. It then starts becoming routine and increasingly boring, eventually becoming little more than masturbating inside a woman.
3] LTR ‘game’ is a waste of time. Why expend all that effort on keeping familiar and aging pussy happy? You could always spend the same amount of time on getting new pussy.
4] All the ‘game’ in the world cannot save you from the effects of job loss, unexpected physical illness, accidents or other stuff beyond your control. What will you do if your ‘investment’ is undone by something beyond your control? Do you have any insurance or recourse?
5] What will you do if the LTR leaves you, for someone else, inspite of your best efforts and ‘investment’? What recourse do you have? What about child support payments, the legal wrangling, custody battles.. and all this because you were trying to be a decent human being?
6] How often do most couples in LTRs fuck? Will you be ever woken with a spontaneous BJ or get one in the shower a few times a week? Sure.. you could ‘rekindle’ the relationship, but at what cost? and why should you have to pay more to get the same thing?
7] Women give the best years of their life to guys who use them as free cum dumpsters. Only after starting to age badly, do they begin their search for ‘mr. right’. Would you pay the new car price for one with 200,000 miles on it?
8] Why should you care about the future of civilization or your legacy? What has civilization done for you? Will your kids even keep in touch with you, let one take care of you?
9] Even if you do everything right, your LTR stays with you and the kids grow up OK… Where is the appreciation for your efforts and sacrifices? You see.. it is your ‘duty’ to take shit so that a condescending hag can pop out a few kids and tell you how lucky you are to be with her.
10] What is your reward for doing the ‘right thing’.. or should I say is there a reward for doing the ‘right thing’?
You could do the ‘right thing’ or live life to its fullest on your terms. Do you know how much good sex can be bought with the amount you spend on your LTR and progeny? Think about the bigger homes, bigger cars, sexless vacations, the yard work, the investments, the saving and scrimping… what will all of that get you? Look around you at all the desperate and unhappy men who are upholding and slaving for a system that treats them as expendable cogs. Want to join their ranks?
You did not choose to be born, but why let others decide how you live or die? Why give them that power when you are getting nothing better in return?
It is your passivity that give them power over your life.. Stand up for yourself, because nobody else will.
You may die in the worst case scenario, but everyone dies in the end.
Do you have anything to lose.. really?
One aspect of white male behavior that has always stumped me is the concept of ‘white knighting’ which manifests itself as ‘chivalry’.
Think about it rationally-
What exactly do you owe a woman who is neither you mother/grandmother nor has previously had sex with you?
What nice thing has she done for you? Will your deferential behavior oblige her to reciprocate? If not, why should you care about her welfare or safety?
In almost every civilization and culture in human history, women are obliged to reciprocate in well-understood ways.
Example 1: In most cultures, married women will often have sex even if they are ‘not into it’ at that moment. It is understood as an obligation to the guy in return for supporting her and the children.
Example 2: Once again, in most cultures women who are dating a guy are expected to put out even if they are “feeling unsexy”, because that is cost of keeping an otherwise decent guy around.
Example 3: Even if the relationship is not sexual, helping a women in most cultures obliges her to gratefully acknowledge it and make it up some other way.
So why do most men in western countries ‘white knight’ even though such behavior will almost never land them any pussy or even a heartfelt ‘thank you’. Why continue doing a thankless job without ‘pay’? You do not seriously believe in an afterlife, do you?
So what is it? and why are most white men so dense? Can you not see the obvious and act in a rational manner?
Whose censure do you fear? What will you not get if you stand up for yourself? Are you getting enough or any? What obligation do you have to a system that treats you as a disposable cog? Who cares about the future of human civilization once you are dead? Does it matter?
Who are you living for anyway- Yourself or to please others? and will pleasing make them give what you want? How has that worked out.. so far?
The inspiration for this poll is a technique that an older woman introduced me to when I was 22. Since then, many paid and ‘unpaid’ girls have satisfied my requests for it.
While I am no fan of having a woman use a sex toy on me, there is one exception. The feeling of a normal vibrator on my balls, taint and asshole when getting a blowjob drives me nuts. It takes most women a little practice to get it right but both the feeling and effects are amazing. More than a few girls have gotten sprayed with an unexpectedly robust volume and intensity.
It is somewhat funny to watch white men worry about the rise of ‘non-whites’ and in the same breath give a host of reasons on why ‘they’ will never win. I have a question-
Do the vast majority of people with supposedly ‘high IQ’ do anything original or useful for their “civilization” or “species”.
For all those white, and increasingly yellow and brown men, who gloat about their education and ‘test scores’.. what have you done in your life that justifies your pride in the scores of a few gerrymandered ‘tests’. The sad and unpalatable reality is that the vast majority of people, even those who are supposedly ‘high IQ’, will never do anything beyond steal, scam and lie to get more money.
Whether you do so by selling drugs, running “illegal” rackets or working in corporate law, practicing medicine or “managing”. You are all just scam artists, who have very marginal utility to continued human existence and progress.
The majority of your position in society is based on your luck and the willingness to continue shitting on others. It does not matter if your lucky break was an acquaintance in a housing project, neighborhood gangster or parents who went to harvard, princeton, wharton or any other “famous” university. It was a series of lucky breaks, not innate ability.
If you had real innate ability, it would have manifested itself through creating something new and at least semi-useful. But those who claim to be special due to their ‘high IQ’ are just rent seeking parasites whose major occupation in life is maintaining status quo.
You celebrate men like Leonardo da vinci, Michealangelo, Jules Verne, Mozart, Beethoven, Einstein, Schroedinger, Oppenheimer, Turing, Gauss, Fritz Haber, Wernher von Braun, Henry Ford, Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard, Steve Jobs, Sergey Brin but how many of you ‘high IQ’ types have ever done something similar to what they did? OK, maybe not that big.. but something? anything?
Your creativity and innovation is manifested through the creation of cartels, monopolies and stealing/ defrauding others. Yet you dare compare yourself with people who did something, just because they look like you.
If you want others to believe that you deserve your position in society because of your ‘high IQ’, do something that demonstrates your contribution to the endeavor. Nobody is stopping you, except yourself.
But you won’t do it because, in reality, you are incompetent. You are basking in the light of a few who can do it, rather like a minor asteroid is illuminated by the star it orbits. You may be made from the same stuff as that star, but you are a minor asteroid.
Deep down, you know that your contribution to civilization is no more than a ‘low IQ’ guy living in squalor.
So stop inventing new, and stupid, rationalizations for why you deserve it and that ‘other guy’ does not. Because that is what HBD and all that BS about ‘IQ’ is really about.
I cannot help but notice that the majority of those who answered my poll have not given even one moderately painful spanking to any woman they have been intimate with.
Seriously guys, what is wrong with you?
Look, I am not suggesting that every single woman is into this stuff. Nor am I suggesting that the spanking should be hard enough to cause bruises, indeed it should not be that hard.
However if you create the right mood and have the right attitude, a sizable minority of women want it again and again. When I first started doing this, the relatively high percentage of women who wanted it was surprising to me. The most bizarre part was many would request it or suggest it once they had gotten it a couple of times.
Just so that we are clear on this- the idea is to make her bare bottom sting badly, and feel sore and pink afterwards. No bruises, no welts, no blue-black discoloration and no blood. She should feel a little soreness for upto 12 hours after the spanking, and that is it. If you are reaching that level in 30 smacks, you are using too much force.
Remember to ramp up the intensity and force to a level where she is feeling it, but not scared of you. It is truly amazing to see an adult woman, across your lap and restrained by only one hand- kick, squirm and plead to stop rather than run away. The very fact that it takes so little persuasion to keep a woman across your lap even though she is feeling some pain, discomfort and embarrassment says volumes about its consensual nature.
It is important that you alternate smacking with serious finger action + rubbing her vulva. So 50-60 smacks, a few minutes of finger play (same position) and repeat till she can no longer take it. It is about pain AND pleasure.
Do this confidently and with command of the situation. Pay attention to her level of lubrication, swelling, warmth etc but do not let her dictate the proceedings. You are in control, not her.
Do not pay too much attention to her protests, because she can always push you away, pull up her panties and walk out of your place if she does not like it. But make sure that the stinging is not unbearable, especially at the beginning + finger/rub her if her bottom gets too sore too quickly.
Remember that you are playing her body like an instrument, and improvisation/ adjustment/ calibration is always necessary.
The whole thing should take 25-30 minutes (the spanking part takes about 10 minutes). The rest is fingering, rubbing, teasing her body.. Insert a well lubed and rubber covered finger or two in her asshole, especially towards the end of the session. It has to feel uncomfortable or unusual but basically safe.. There is something about painting her vulva, asshole, crack and inner thigh with a lubed medium-bristle toothbrush (remember she cannot see what is happening in that position and you are still holding one of her hands behind her back). The spanked area around them makes sensations more intense, or so I am told.
You are successful when she will say something along the lines of “this is so weird and fucked up.. but its feels so good”.
But be confident about what you are doing.. I cannot stress this enough!
Spanking = at least 100 medium-hard swats on at least one occasion with the palm of your hand on her bare bottom.
I have mentioned, on many previous occasions, that women willing to take bare-bottom spankings will almost always end up sleeping with you. The following is my hypothesis on why it works, and how I have used it to counter LMR. Note- I am talking about moderately painful spankings, not 10-20 odd smacks.
Important: Do not trick her, tie her up or otherwise coerce her into taking a bare-bottom spanking.
Almost every adult sees a bare-bottom spanking as something done to naughty children, even though they may enjoy it as adults. So how does this affect the dynamics of a new relationship?
The simple answer is that the spanker becomes the authority figure, the spankee becomes the naughty, and helpless, girl who has no option but to take the spanking. It is precisely for this reason that the spanking has to be moderately painful. A light spanking does not quite make the point about who is in charge.
If you concerned about whether she can take it, let her know that it will sting and she will feel sore afterwards. As long as you are using your hand, her slipper or hairbrush, most will consent.
The spanking has to be hard enough to-
1. Make her squirm in a uncoordinated manner.
2. Make her kicking irregular and uncoordinated.
3. Should have to use her hand to cover her bottom.
4. She should beg (not demand) you to stop it.
5. She should be significantly wetter than when you started (monitor it as the spanking progresses).
My modus operandi is:
Step 1: Somewhere between kissing and her/your place.. she should already have received a few smacks on her clothed bottom. How you initiate it is upto you, but never be apologetic.
Step 2: If she does not like it, leave her.. it is not worth it. If she is a semi-willing participant, give her more. If she is anxious, let her know that it will be just your palm and her bottom (nothing more).
Step 3: Once you are in a private place, and more stuff happens.. push it further. You can either playfully exacerbate the spanking to get her over your lap/knees or just tell her that you want to spank her. Again, no apologies about your desires.
Step 4: Tell her that the panties won’t be completely removed till she wants to, but her pants/shorts must go. Hike skirt as necessary.
Step 5: Spank her on the bare-bottom (panties etc around her knees), but build up the intensity rather than starting at full power. Feel free to use a little moisturizer/lotion on her bottom (it makes the sting worser). Approximately 1 smack per second, alternate cheeks and aim for their fleshiest parts
Step 6: Somewhere around the 100-200 hard smack mark, most will start moving around and squirming. If you have positioned her properly, only one of her hands can reach her butt. If she tries to do that, grab and hold it against her back.
Step 7: If you are using your hand (palms) it will take about 400-500 hand smacks to get her to the point where she feels like a naughty helpless girl under your control. That is less than 10 minutes, and unless she bruises easily.. she will be pink and sore, but nothing else.
Using the hand allows you to make it sting without overdoing it. Remember that even 200 moderately hard smacks with a hairbrush or slipper will often make her cry (for real).
Step 8: By the 500 hand-smack mark, her panties will be either around her ankles or she may have already kicked them off. Use the hairbrush sparingly after that.. do not make it too painful the first time around.
Step 9: Keep on checking if she is becoming wetter, as you spank her. Feel free to play with her vulva and finger her a bit between spanks.
Step 10: After she had enough, according to you, give her a nice hug, lots of passionate kisses, rub her ass and play with her cunt.
Step 11: Let her recover for a few minutes. Some women will cry..don’t say a lot. Just comfort her like you would do if you knew her for years.
Step 12: After she has recovered, start escalating the sex play again.. but remember to maintain the dominant frame. Getting off the tiger is more dangerous than riding it.
It works because you have just made her feel like a helpless girl who is being dominated by a guy she likes.
She is getting her “forced by brute who loves me fantasy” without anything worser than a sore bottom. The best part is that semi-consensual spanking without physical restraint and forced penile penetration would be hard to interpret as anything other than BDSM, if you get my drift.
They are feeling the burn…
Let me start with a provocative question.
Would the sudden death of every person (and their descendants) who attended an ivy league university, or their equivalent in other countries, affect the pace of innovation negatively.
Many idiots believe that these institutions are bastions of free thought, innovation and progress. However in reality they represent and propagate the opposite, and are bastions of the status quo.
These institutions are the famous seminaries of our age, indoctrinating clever and connected people in their version of theology.
The performance of their students on any test of “IQ” or any other measure of cleverness is inconsequential precisely because they are defending the status quo. Their purported support for innovation, free thought and occasional sponsorship of rising radicals is simply window-dressing to convince gullible people that they are not seminaries.
Consider this.. is the quality or content on instruction in these universities different from other universities? So what makes their students special?
Paradoxically, what makes the students of “famous” universities different from other is not intelligence or even cleverness, but CONFORMITY. The willingness to suppress your beliefs, please others, jump through hoops created by others and sucking up are crucial to admission and success in these universities.
These institutions are selecting and training complaint and zealous “defenders of the faith and status quo”. Many innovators who started at ivy league institutions dropped out or had started their own gigs and went away from the ivy league mainstream before they finished. Why?
Why would those who support (and defend) the status quo want innovation, progress or improvement. These cocksuckers have a certainty about their worldview that is religious in nature. They look at challenges or efforts to question the status quo in the same light as inquisitors and witch-burners looked upon heretics and “witches”. Their authority derives from maintaining the status quo.
And many idiots still believe that these people are the “best and brightest”. By that definition, the priests and monks in the dark ages were also the “best and brightest” but they did not innovate a lot.. did they?
The “success”, status and wealth of such people is based on connections, cartels and fraud. But many idiots conflate that with ability, and then blame those without such networks for being undeserving.
These people are neither innovators nor wealth producers, they are rentiers.
But do you know the difference, or should I say- Do you want to know the difference?
Have you ever noticed that FaceBook (FB) is, in one respect, very similar to online dating?
Think about it.. even average looking women have hundreds if not thousands of FB ‘friends’. If you look at the lists of friends, a high percentage are male acquaintances or ‘friend-of-friends’. Even if a fraction of these ‘orbiters’ and ‘manginas’ try to contact any given women on a semi-regular basis, it would do wonders for that cunts ego.
Online dating creates a very similar situation, where girls get an inflated sense of their worth because every guy will contact dozens if not hundreds of women. Even though the majority of guys are just playing a number game and would never fuck them for more than a few times, at best, almost every women thinks she has hordes of men who will kiss her ass and satisfy her every whim. Therefore they think that they can be dismissive and flaky.
FB by creating a similar ecology, makes even average women think they are gods gift to men. This is especially the case with younger attention whores, who only have to ‘add’ friends + post a few drunken pictures to achieve a following of manginas, nice guys and white knights. Moreover if a guy treats, or calls out, her as the cunt she is.. well, she can always ‘defriend’/ block him. She will also get a lot of support from fellow cunts, attention whore, manginas, white knights and nice guys.
Do you see where this going to lead? My prediction is that FB and other social media are going to create a newer and larger group of ‘entitled’ women, especially in the younger age groups. Therefore, you should expect increased flaking in women whose are heavy users of social media.
However this same information could be used to filter out flaky women. Maybe it is necessary to create criteria for flaky women based on their FB usage, updates and friend list/composition.
Any takers for creating such a definition set? Comments?
Many idiots seem to equate “scientifically measured IQ” with intelligence. However I believe that IQ, at best, measures cleverness not intelligence.
Cleverness is often conflated with intelligence, but in reality is a very different beast.
In my view cleverness is the ability to learn a game well, while intelligence is the ability to speculate about the reasons behind the games existence.
Let me start with a seldom asked question:
Why do the big leaps in human civilization and technology come from men who are “outsiders” to their area of contribution? Why are established “insiders” so impotent at innovating?
If IQ had any effect on innovation, established insiders who rose through the ranks of their field based on their cleverness should have no problems innovating. But why is that almost never the case?
Why are those who convince others of their ‘expertise’ so utterly incapable of advancing the field they profess competence in?
Whether we are talking about the decimal numerical system, gunpowder, airplanes, morphine extraction, antibacterial sulfonamides, nuclear fission, rocketry, binary programmable computers, IC engines.. all of them were not the work of famous “insiders” but of “unknowns” or “outsiders”.
Innovation is the result of looking at the world in a different way, and has far more to do with rejecting existing beliefs than being clever. I am certainly not the first to point out the reason behind Jewish success in many intellectual endeavours has as much to do with being cynical outsiders, as innate intelligence. It is far easier to be innovative if you do not benefit from the existing status quo.
The success of the west has much more to do with not persecuting or ignoring heretics, than any special genetic attributes. The scientific age in the west began when they stopped burning heretics and witches. The intellectual stagnation of civilizations like India or China was largely due to active and passive ostracization of heretical thinkers after a certain point in their history.
However the cultural changes that allowed heretical thinking in the west were largely due to chance events (black death) and being at the right place at the right time (collapse of the eastern roman empire) in the right conditions (no centralized and organized kingdoms). The renaissance had more to do with an alignment of events than any special intrinsic ability of whites.
Innovation in the west (and throughout human history) has always been driven by malcontents who thought differently. Innovation is similar to feeling your way in the dark, than talking the well-lit path.
Those who chose well-lit paths like medicine, law, management, finance are not and can never be innovators. However many idiots point to the “high IQ scores” of precisely these groups to justify the relevance of IQ to innovation. But how can you correlate IQ with innovation, if none exists?
Were the wright brothers the most intelligent group trying to develop airplanes? Was Domgak the most intelligent guy working on synthetic antibacterials? I can go on.. but why did they succeed where many other more established ‘experts’ had previously failed?
The simple answer is:
They broke away from what was conventional and established, and got away with it.
Their IQ was consequential to the extent that they were not brain-damaged. If they had “high IQs” they would have discovered a thousand reasons to not do what they did.. because “high IQ” is really about being good at playing established games, not discovering new ones.
Maybe the Wright Brothers would have had a more successful bicycle business or Domgak would have risen higher in the hierarchy of the company he worked for. Maybe Lisa Meitner would have escaped to England sooner and never discovered controlled nuclear fission. Maybe Semelweiss would have decided to never promote the concept of antisepsis to the detriment of his medical career. Maybe Oppenheimer would have decided to develop his dads clothing business than chase an unstable career in nuclear physics. Maybe Einstein would have become a better patent clerk than dabble in speculative physics. Maybe Rudolf Diesel would have applied himself to make a better gasoline engine than develop the diesel engine.
The lack of asian names in this list is due to the asian tendency of choosing stable, established, known lines of enterprise over dabbling in the risky and unknown.
More in another post.
My interactions with ‘normal’ women frequently remind me of why I use escorts.
Here are a couple of recent examples.
Example 1: A 28-year old assistant manager of a restaurant, which I visit infrequently. She is 5′ 6″, size 12, OK face, single.. and somewhat flirty with me. She did hint to the fact that she was lonely a couple of times, so I asked her out for a drink. Her reply- too many customers bother her and that is why she does not go out with them. Now remember that this place has a much older clientèle than many restaurants.
So here is the deal.. She is single, lonely and yet does not want to go out with a guy she is flirting with, inspite of her very average looks. What is she waiting for? magic? miracle? divine intervention?
I obliquely suggested that we could be discreet about things worked or failed. But she would rather be lonely and wait for the ‘right’ guy then get frequent poundings and a warm body to sleep next to.
Since asking her for a drink, I have fucked + been sucked by 2 escorts and got sucked multiple times by a third (BJ queen). Even the plainest of them would beat her in the looks category by a big margin.
So who lost?
Example 2: Had a nice chat and asked out a girl in her very late 20s who works in one the buildings around me. She is single, but is supposedly very busy and not sure if she has time for a relationship.
Obviously she believes in a ‘Deus ex Machina’ delivering the ‘perfect’ guy to her at the ‘right’ time. As I have said before, people should follow their chosen path as long as they are prepared to accept the logical consequences.
This was a few months ago, and I must have had over 20 unique escorts since then. I guess her rejection was not my loss.
A few of my memorable conversations, over the years, with women..
Context- I had met this girl a week or so ago at a pub + one visit to where she worked.(retail)
Me: So, you want to go for coffee/ drinks tomorrow?
Her: No, I am not interested in dating. I have a busy life right now… blah blah.
Me: Good to know, in any case the semi-homeless girl who blew me after I bought her a nice dinner on Tuesday was better looking than you.
Her: Shocked expression.
Me: Come on.. a 27 year old like you can never compete in the looks department with a 19 year old like her, inspite of what you would like to believe.
Her: That is so gross!
Me: Nonsense, she was shaved bald. Plus she gave really good head..
Her: I don’t know what to say..
Me: and I don’t care.. bye.
The next one gave in..
Context- She was an ex-fatty, who did flirt with me a few times before. I told her that her shirt made her look fatter than she was. She was upset and wanted me to apologize.
Me: No way, look I am trying to help you (and walked away)
I ignored her the next time she met. She comes up to me..
Her: Hey, I am sorry that I overreacted. You were right..
Me: You have a pretty face, but that style of shirts was making you look.. well uglier than necessary.
Her: Hey, you want to chat sometime.
Me: Sure, here is my phone number.. give me a call.
She did that evening, and after a few minutes of normal chat..
Me: Come over to my place and have a few drinks.
Her: I don’t know..
Me: You have seen me around town for almost 6 months.. nothing you do not want is going to happen to you.
Her: What do you want?
Me: Do you really want to know..
Me: Have a few drinks in the jacuzzi tub with you.
Her: I don’t have a bikini swimsuit..
Me: What you wear or don’t wear is your choice.
Her: OK.. I will come over but I cannot promise you about the jacuzzi tub part.
Me: Fine.. see you in an hour then.
Her: Ok sweety..
She did come to my apartment, things happened and she slept over that night. All that drinking, tub and sex was exhausting. It did lead to a good STR.
I have a lot more material, and will write it in upcoming posts.
Most human problems are self-inflicted and this is true regardless of civilization, culture and race. This post concentrates on the self-inflicted problems of white men. Come on.. you knew that I was going to start there.
Self-inflicted problems are usually due to attitudes, beliefs and prejudices that have no basis in reality. It easy to identify such crap because it is often defended by sophism.
So lets start..
Eggs are more valuable than sperm. Some prominent white ‘thinker’ or ‘expert’ said so.
Ok.. First, stop believing people based on their qualifications because that is religion- not science.
Let us dissect this agreement, shall we. Eggs are more valuable than sperm only if fertile females of that species live in harems AND significant dual parental involvement is unnecessary. Applying that to humans is problematic because we fail both criteria. Even the most primitive or war-like tribes have a M-F ratio of about 1:1. Human children not only require two involved parents, but a host of surrogate part-time parents (grandparents, friends, etc).
We forget that sex has as much a role in reducing aggression and maintaining social cohesion as in reproduction. Do human beings have a defined mating season? If the main role of human sexuality was reproduction, we would have a defined rutting season with very little sex for the rest of the year. The lack of a defined mating season favors sex as a recreational activity, with babies as a byproduct and fits in with our understanding of substantial resources/ social stability needed to raise human children.
Pussy is more valuable than dick. Everyone says so..
People once burnt heretics for suggesting the possibility of intelligent ETs. People have been slaughtered for believing in the ‘wrong’ god. Educated white men believed that the devil possessed a formidable penis. All of this.. less than 400 years ago. Heck, few believed that the iPhone could get away with a touchscreen-only interface less than 4 years ago..
The assertion that pussy is more valuable than dick is not reflected in human history, and in most of human civilization today. How do you explain the fact that decent or better pussy is very cheap and easy to obtain in most countries (as long as you are discreet).
Growing up in a more socially conservative country, I never had any real problems getting ‘unpaid’ pussy (as long as it was done discreetly). I have some interesting stories of girls/ women seducing me ;) AND in almost all cases it was about sex and intimacy (rather than committed relationships). Those memories just gave me an erection..
A girl who I did stuff with at 12 (she was 13) initiated the kissing and getting naked part. ‘R’ used to stalk me on her bike, finally seducing me in a particularly memorable way- for another time. Another one got me by asking my opinion first about her lingerie and then about her body.. Still another one made me join her in the shower- another story. Girls can be such perverts, if they want it. ;) One of the gals I mentioned in a previous article (my pity booty call) was very matter of fact about her physical needs, and once I said yes.. things happened very quickly. :D
The whole idea that women are born to very choosy about who they fuck is nonsense. As long as it is discreet and the risk of pregnancy/disease is low- most women are not particularly selective about who they fuck. White, and increasingly non-white women, in the west are the real outliers. Why?
Because for most non-pedestaled women, sex is also about pleasure, intimacy, human contact and physical release- in other words, what it should be. Sure.. they also use it to get money, richer men and power.. but most know that they cannot get far by being a cunt. However in a society that pedestals women, they know they can get away with anything they please.
In most non-western cultures women are openly appreciative of attention and more than willing to give sex to get attention, pleasure, some security and companionship. But their men do not pedestalize women, like white knights and manginas do in the west.
I am sorry to say this, but most white men are white knights and manginas.
More in the next post.