On Bad Faith: 8
Some commentators on my recent articles have voiced two views that deserve to be publicly shredded. While they may have said it in a less upfront manner, their messages can be distilled to:
1] Women have the right to choose who they sleep with, without ANY consequences.
2] You have no right to demand that white, or other, women see you as equal.
So let us go after the first message/concept..
Let us begin by ignoring the fact that women had little or no choice about their sexual partners through almost all of human history.
Even after ignoring this glaring precondition, what were are looking at is called ‘entitlement without reciprocity’.
Entitlements serve a very useful purpose in society, libertarian and conservative viewpoints notwithstanding. However entitlements that work, involve reciprocity from the beneficiary. Therefore publicly paid health care, food stamps, welfare, employment insurance, social security etc work because they guarantee a humane existence to people in exchange for not rocking the boat or revolting against the status quo.
However current entitlements for women do not involve worthwhile reciprocity. In previous eras, societies in which most women had more than two kids, did not ride the cock carousel in their 20s and played the role of good housewives/mothers, could afford to provide them with certain entitlements.However such entitlements tend to fail once the reciprocity is gone. Women can now lie, trick, steal, falsely accuse and act in a childish manner without consequence.
Today, women can extract maximum rewards from a potential sexual partner without giving away anything. This state of affairs is made possible by, predominantly white and, spineless men. It is they who support, and facilitate, such behavior, regardless of their ideological affiliations. In all previous eras of human history, a woman who accepted something from a guy, owed him something in return.
Both girl 1 and 2 in my ‘sadistic behavior: 1′ post were unattached and average looking. Both knew that I was not looking for a GF, but was open to possibilities.
But they chose to reject a guy they were went out with.
Now here is the deal.. If a woman is not physically repulsed by a guy and he is attracted to her, what is the harm in getting intimate with him? As previously mentioned, both girls were average looking (or less) and unattached. Yes, I can see the ‘hypergamy’ argument.. but such behavior is facilitated by stupid and spineless men.
Their real choice was between a vibrator and a human being, and they chose the former over the later.
Realistically, the worst outcome in both cases would have somewhat awkward sex and some post-sex cuddling. But they chose a vibrator over average sex + physical contact with a human being.
It that was their choice, why should I treat them any better.
The 3rd gal was a self-confessed slut who was very open about her high partner count. Why would a guy take her out for a few drinks, after knowing her sexual history, for any reason other than sex. Come on.. be logical. By her admission, she had not done it with Asians or Indians. Any guesses for the real reasons behind her selectivity?
The belief that men like me will take such behavior, without incident or malice, is not founded in reality. In any case, she did get five white cocks inside her that night, or so I heard. 
More in a future post..
Heh, well said. I took lots of shit from both sides for arguing basically the same thing a year ago. Feminists in particular start shouting in these situations “YOU DON’T CONTROL MY BODY I CAN DO WHAT I LIKE YOU MISOGYNIST”. Of course you can do what you like, you silly girl. But you don’t live in a vacuum – every action you take has consequences. Respect is repaid with respect…derision repaid with the same. Ye reap what ye hath sown.
—-
Feminists can be choosy about whom they sleep with, as long as they don’t expect men to play nice.
Punish them until they submitt!!
“Any guesses for the real reasons behind her selectivity?”
It wasn’t necessarily racism. I was recently LJBFed by slutty white girl and I’m white. Sometimes sluts just want a “nice guy” to hang out with so that they won’t feel slutty for a change.
If a woman has an inspiring talent, has a good sense of humor, believes in the concept of reciprocity, is fun to be around, and actually treats men as people and not utilities, sure I’d consider being a “friend.” I have a wonderful (married) female friend with those characteristics and we are great friends. But how many women meet those criteria? How many women even meet one of those criteria?
Women have reduced themselves to shallow, boorish, and manipulative pieces of meat, with a few interesting orifices. They should not expect to be treated any better than that. Why on earth would a self-respecting man want to be “friends” with them? Would you want to be friends with us if we acted like you?
So ladies, tell me again why we should treat you any better than as a talking vagina?
1] Women have the right to choose who they sleep with, without ANY consequences.
2] You have no right to demand that white, or other, women see you as equal2] Men the right to chose what they think about the choices the women made, and men have the right to act according to their own choice of thought. (disclaimer: without inflicting direct harm)
A man does not have to respect or accept a woman’s choice.
—
But women don’t see it that way, and many older men play along.
That is the other part of “my body my choice”, as a man I also have a body and a soul, thus, my body my choice.
“Now here is the deal.. If a woman is not physically repulsed by a guy and he is attracted to her, what is the harm in getting intimate with him? ”
Maybe she doesn’t want to have sex with him? Maybe she doesn’t have sex with every man she meets? Maybe she’s worried Roissy et al would slam her for riding the cock carousel?
—-
In that case, she should not expect me to care.
@ blogowner
I’m assuming with your so-called sense of fairness and anti-racism you think it would be absolutely fine for a black man to go to India and have this attitude towards Indian women? Maybe your sister?
—-
Does it matter?
@finndistan “A man does not have to respect or accept a woman’s choice”
Sounds like rape to me. If you’re not interested in what she wants, walk away like a man. For every door that closes, another one opens.
—-
It depends on your definition of “respect” and “accept”.
Lily:
@finndistan “A man does not have to respect or accept a woman’s choice”
Sounds like rape to me. If you’re not interested in what she wants, walk away like a man. For every door that closes, another one opens.
Just like dissention said, women don’t see it that way. I will add that women cannot even fathom men seeing it that way,
Let me explain:
Not needing to respect the woman’s choices means not needing to respect the woman because she is a woman.
It means a man is free to decide if a woman is basically fuck material or date material, or even none, depending on her choices.
Not rape. On the contrary, the man has the right to choose to have nothing to do with her.
To walk away, after a fuck, or without a fuck. Just to walk away.
and that is the thing that women seem not to understand. We have the choice to walk away.