Self-Inflicted Problems: 1
Most human problems are self-inflicted and this is true regardless of civilization, culture and race. This post concentrates on the self-inflicted problems of white men. Come on.. you knew that I was going to start there.
Self-inflicted problems are usually due to attitudes, beliefs and prejudices that have no basis in reality. It easy to identify such crap because it is often defended by sophism.
So lets start..
Eggs are more valuable than sperm. Some prominent white ‘thinker’ or ‘expert’ said so.
Ok.. First, stop believing people based on their qualifications because that is religion- not science.
Let us dissect this agreement, shall we. Eggs are more valuable than sperm only if fertile females of that species live in harems AND significant dual parental involvement is unnecessary. Applying that to humans is problematic because we fail both criteria. Even the most primitive or war-like tribes have a M-F ratio of about 1:1. Human children not only require two involved parents, but a host of surrogate part-time parents (grandparents, friends, etc).
We forget that sex has as much a role in reducing aggression and maintaining social cohesion as in reproduction. Do human beings have a defined mating season? If the main role of human sexuality was reproduction, we would have a defined rutting season with very little sex for the rest of the year. The lack of a defined mating season favors sex as a recreational activity, with babies as a byproduct and fits in with our understanding of substantial resources/ social stability needed to raise human children.
Pussy is more valuable than dick. Everyone says so..
People once burnt heretics for suggesting the possibility of intelligent ETs. People have been slaughtered for believing in the ‘wrong’ god. Educated white men believed that the devil possessed a formidable penis. All of this.. less than 400 years ago. Heck, few believed that the iPhone could get away with a touchscreen-only interface less than 4 years ago..
The assertion that pussy is more valuable than dick is not reflected in human history, and in most of human civilization today. How do you explain the fact that decent or better pussy is very cheap and easy to obtain in most countries (as long as you are discreet).
Growing up in a more socially conservative country, I never had any real problems getting ‘unpaid’ pussy (as long as it was done discreetly). I have some interesting stories of girls/ women seducing me 
AND in almost all cases it was about sex and intimacy (rather than committed relationships). Those memories just gave me an erection..
A girl who I did stuff with at 12 (she was 13) initiated the kissing and getting naked part. ‘R’ used to stalk me on her bike, finally seducing me in a particularly memorable way- for another time. Another one got me by asking my opinion first about her lingerie and then about her body.. Still another one made me join her in the shower- another story. Girls can be such perverts, if they want it.
The whole idea that women are born to very choosy about who they fuck is nonsense. As long as it is discreet and the risk of pregnancy/disease is low- most women are not particularly selective about who they fuck. White, and increasingly non-white women, in the west are the real outliers. Why?
Because for most non-pedestaled women, sex is also about pleasure, intimacy, human contact and physical release- in other words, what it should be. Sure.. they also use it to get money, richer men and power.. but most know that they cannot get far by being a cunt. However in a society that pedestals women, they know they can get away with anything they please.
In most non-western cultures women are openly appreciative of attention and more than willing to give sex to get attention, pleasure, some security and companionship. But their men do not pedestalize women, like white knights and manginas do in the west.
I am sorry to say this, but most white men are white knights and manginas.
More in the next post.
The assertion that pussy is more valuable than dick is not reflected in human history, and in most of human civilization today. How do you explain the fact that decent or better pussy is very cheap and easy to obtain in most countries (as long as you are discreet).
Pussy *is* more valuable than dick. Your own actions point to this. You pay escorts to have sex with them. They aren’t paying you for sex. You can see a thriving open-air market for pussy in almost any major city in the world. The market for dick (at least dick which caters to women) is virtually non-existent.
—–
One clarification, I am not obsidian and have no interest in any big arguments with you.
and ya, sure men have a higher sex desire- but you can either play along or be ignored. Your choice..
If you have a society of 1 man and ten women, that society will manage to reproduce itself for the next generation. A society of ten men and 1 woman however, is likely to die out very quickly, if the men don’t kill themselves fighting over the woman first. A guy produces millions of sperm every day, but a woman only has about 13 viable eggs per year produced, if she’s lucky. Sperm is not as valuable as eggs. You can also see this reflected in the prices that people are willing to pay for sperm and eggs on the open market.
—-
No.. a society of 1 man to 10 women is as unviable as the reverse scenario. You are assuming that we live in some garden of eden with oodles of self-repairing technology and no external threats. Sorry to burst your bubble.. but it does not work that way.
The whole idea that women are born to very choosy about who they fuck is nonsense. As long as it is discreet and the risk of pregnancy/disease is low- most women are not particularly selective about who they fuck.
The whining of omegas everywhere says otherwise. But low-quality women are not very choosy about who they have sex with. They can’t afford to be. But as you go up the quality scale, women get more and more choosy, and get very selective.
—–
That is their choice, however men also have their options.
But even the ugliest girls usually don’t go around sleeping with everyone willy-nilly. Even they do practice some (small) measure of selection in who they will sleep with.
—–
Their choice, but don’t expect men like me to help or care.
A woman has no real value beyond her sexual self, and once she ages beyond a point.. could as well be converted to fish chum (and nobody would care, especially now).
and ya, sure men have a higher sex desire- but you can either play along or be ignored. Your choice..
Yes, men do have higher sexual desire, which is one of the reasons why pussy is more valuable than dick. Asymmetrical sexual desire virtually guarantees this result. Women do play along, but can hardly be expected to play along with every guy who wants them to. The prettiest ones would do little else!
—-
How would an ugly cunt like you know that.
A woman has no real value beyond her sexual self, and once she ages beyond a point.. could as well be converted to fish chum (and nobody would care, especially now).
Perhaps to you, a woman only has sexual value, and nothing else. To herself, obviously, that isn’t the case. To society, especially modern society, women have more value than just their sexual roles. Not the least of which is working in various capacities outside of the home, in positions which have nothing to do with sex.
—–
That remains to be seen..
Their choice, but don’t expect men like me to help or care.
Except in the real-world, the opposite result is usually the case. Think about how men treat women who are indiscriminate in who they have sex with. Usually with contempt and hatred.
—–
Those men are old and dying out..
Women who are highly choosy about they have sex with, are venerated. Think about it this way, which scenario is likely to motivate a man passing by, a young prostitute getting beaten up and/or mugged, or an old nun? I think many more men would stop to help the old nun before they would the prostitute. Being indiscriminate sexually does not bring much if any benefits to a woman, and most women realize that, and act accordingly.
—–
Nowadays, no sane young guy will help ANY woman.
Pussy isn’t valuable; at least not anymore.
Perhaps when women were chaste, then yes. Now? Sex is easy to obtain. All it takes is a certain degree of self-respect and confidence, decent physique, and women respond to that extremely well.
The effort I put into acquiring pussy is extremely low: I never cold approach women, and usually never at all. In the past 2 weeks, I got a Vegas stripper’s # (its legit, we exchanged some texts), and had a single mother (I know, unfair) repeatedly suggest we go out. All I did was smile and hold conversation – pussy is valuable my ass.
When you artificially limit the number of ways you will allow yourself to obtain something, of course it will seem more valuable then it is.
—
Bingo! In most countries (at least the non-muslim ones) horny and giving women are fairly common (even if things are done discreetly). Also once you get naked with women, it ends in sex.
In other words, the root of the problem is the Religion of Pedestalization.
And as you said “once you get naked with women, it ends in sex”, which means that even if you get naked with the other ones, according to the Doctrine of Pedestalization, they are allowed to say no at the last moment because “the right one” might show up in the next hour.
May God uproot them from Earth to Hell!
And another thing…
An increasing number of men, such as myself, are fully capable of seducing pussy but we have chosen to “go our own way” by either declaring celibacy or only having sex on bachelor vacations in non-misandrist parts of the world.
Also, as many men online have pointed out, sex toys are going to become incredibly immersive and fun in the next ten years as they integrate with 3d technology on the computer. Literally millions of men will have the option of a ready and willing cybergal at home, rather than dealing with these fucking intolerable bitches we have in the u.s. I can’t WAIT to see the fear and loathing that happens when Americunts realize they’ve been “made redundant” by technology.
She Blinded Me With Science!
Pedestalization is limited to a fairly narrow cultural context, Victorian Christianity, but since this cultural context runs the world men assume it’s ubiquitous.
Really? Let’s do the math, and ignore genetic problems(extreme):
1 man 10 women:
Well… how many kids CAN THIS SYSTEM SUPPORT? Let’s say 2 kids for every person. Okay, they have 22 kids. Each woman has 2.2 kids.
10 men, 1 women:
Well…. how man kids can the woman have? 8 is a pretty typical number.
Okay, they have 8 kids. Two men don’t have any kids.
After that, normal sex ratios are restored, and the “example” fails.
So… at the upper limit of NEVER HAPPEN CRAZY RATIOS… the 10 men to 1 women group suffers a temporary 27% drop in population. The other population doubles in that time.
In the real world, the men are better “providers” than the women, and the primarily women could not, IN FACT, support 22 kids. Also, what would happen, in the real world, is that the 10 men and 1 women group would walk over to the nearly all women group, kill the man, and enslave the women. Problem solved!
With a more sane ratio… there is little real effect:
2 men, 9 women:
22 kids
9 men, 2 women:
16 kids
Difference:Population increase of 45% instead of 100%… problem ceases in one generation.
Why not the same number of kids per woman? Otherwise, it doesn’t really make sense.
Oh, snap, son! Someone be all butthurt up in this bitch!
Yes, Virginia, in our species, eggs are more valuable than sperm. I can splooge out a billion swimmers like it ain’t no thing three times a day for fifty years. A girl gets one egg a month for what, thirty years? Scarcity, supply and demand. Also, the potential cost for a girl fucking the wrong guy and getting pregnant is out of all proportion to a guy getting some double bagger knocked up. So, the woman is in a position to choose, the man does the offering. All the game stuff is bargaining tactics designed to make the girl feel like she’s getting a better deal than she really is, and to raise her customer satisfaction. The girl-not you.
—-
I can see why you frequent game blogs.. never mind.
Getting mad at women for being women is retarded. It’s like getting mad at a cat for being a cat instead of a dog. Getting mad at fuckable women for not failing to notice their market advantage is being angry at Toyota for charging more than Hyundai.
—–
That is an incorrect example.
And as far as how much better it is in India, well, shit, go live in Bihar and save youself a chunk of cash that you currently spend on hooks. If you prefer to live in the west while hating whitey and chuckling with glee at his impending fall from power, I got news for you: the current Indian elites are an extension of western civ, ever since the last mogul died, and especially the ones who immigrated to the West. Should whitey fall, the morlocks will scarf your ass up faster than you can say “chicken vindaloo.”
—–
It is over for your type.. really. Just suck it up…
To put this into perspective, you spend $25K a year to fuck attractive prostitutes. The reason you’re paying them instead of vice versa is twofold: they control a scarce resource, and they’re taking a big hit in their market value by spending their fertile years hooking. Marrying an ex-whore is like buying a rental car or farm truck.
—–
Once I am done with them, who cares. It is easy to find hotter escorts.. Nobody likes investing in a depreciating asset.
*************
Well, D., because you are an entitled woman, you are used to being taken care of like a spoiled princess.
So a “new set of shoes” or “another kid” or whatever other ACCESSORY you want for you life makes perfect sense if another woman has it.
The problem is, the man-slaves in your lives are the ones who have to pay for it.
The 1 man-slave of those ten women would be quite incapable of paying for 80 children.
This is obvious if you have spent your life paying for things. Difficult, if like D, you are a spoiled princess.
—–
She is too stupid to conceptualize that.
This is an interesting thesis, but I think the top poster might be right. If it were the other way around, wouldn’t girls be paying 200$ an hour to sleep with you?
—-
once civilization ceases to be functional, people will take what they can.
Bitch-like shaming tactic noted. Big guy, I have no trouble pulling 7′s consistently. But why do YOU visit game blogs? If you’re fucking fat chicks and escorts, who needs game?
—-
So can I, but the effort and extra BS is not worth it. I can get 8 and 9s for 200-300$/hr.
If it was over for my type, then my type would be lining up around the block to go to work in India for babus like yourself, instead of vice versa, and we’d be having this conversation in Hindi on an Indian game blog. The fact that you guys would be dying like flies if not for the Green Revolution created by Norman Borlaug, whereas India has contributed very little to our lives in the last 2000 years also speaks for itself.
—-
Nobody cares..
Your culture can’t LIVE without ours; ours doesn’t even notice your existence most of the time. In fact, you yourself have bought into our culture, and for good reason.
—–
I don’t think you get it, your culture will exist long after your racial type is extinct or assimilated.
But throwing a temper tantrum and screaming “I hope you all DIE!” when our culture fails to treat you like the unique little snowflake you are is…unimpressive. You’re an intelligent guy, but you’re not using your intelligence constructively, and your writing projects a lot of misery.
——
I am not hoping.. I can see it.
Finally, since it seems like you have no plans to marry or have children, it’s hard to see how you plan to inherit the earth from the white man.
—–
There are many more like me than like you.
I’m not seeing it. You’re writing about getting stood up and butthurt by fives. Paying for sex is degrading fundamentally.
—-
It will be funny when that attitude is returned with interest.
It’s a little early to consign my racial type to the dustbin of history-historically, those who think like this have themselves wound up in said dustbin instead.
——
You have no advantages, but more liabilities.
I also have doubts about your ability to adopt the productive parts of said culture if its bearers are physically extinct. Western science has been widespread in India for the last 160 years or so. How many Nobel Prize winners in the hard sciences has India produced? How many great inventions for humanity?
——
Do you really believe that whites are meritocratic or honest?
The Green Revolution is relevant-if you rely on the West/whites to solve your existential problems, hoping that the West/whitey dies out is…well, dumb. Or do you think that the Green Revolution is the last such problem you’ll ever face? As far as nobody caring-sure, if you assume that the hundreds of thousands of people alive today solely thanks to the Green Revolution and other Western inventions are ignorant ingrates.
——-
Nobody will remember that after history is rewritten.
“The dumb will always beat the smart, because there are more of us” was supposed to be ironic. I have my doubts about the success of this strategy in the long run. Even if it works out, Idiocracy-style, you and the rest of the babus will be on the losing side. You can’t fight, you won’t breed…but hey, at least whitey’s screwed!
——-
You won’t be around to see whether you were right.. so it is inconsequential.
When what attitude is returned with interest?
—-
Lack of cooperation in complex systems is worser than open aggression.
Our (European/Ashkenazi-”white” is a nebulous concept, including the Kalash, for instance) advantage is unparalleled creative fertility and ability to create value. Even our shittiest ideas like Marxism, feminism and Keynesian economics are more compelling than the best you guys have come up with in the last 1000 years. Our advantage isn’t meritocracy, where the Chinese had the market cornered 1500 years ago, or honesty, which for instance the Turks have us beat on, but this unparalleled creative fertility, along with a social structure that leverages it to create value instead of curios. Maybe there was some sort of positive feedback loop between the two. Until you guys learn how to reproduce this, which I haven’t seen, wishing for a world without us is cutting off your nose to spite your face.
—–
But you won’t be there..
Your wish to rewrite history (another one of those Western bad ideas which is so compelling) is telling of your personal character: unable to impose your will on the women you desire, you daydream of imposing it on global consciousness. However, this is stupid.
—–
Do you really think I care?
A world without us would coast along on our creations for a while, assuming enough skilled techs to maintain and copy them; you can see Roman architectural concepts like the arch used in Muslim architecture for 1300 years after the collapse of the Western Empire; however, this would last until the first global crisis, which would result in a cascade of failure, mass dieoffs and a return to a steady state of misery. An example is nitrate depletion.
——-
You really think whites are special.. OK. Keep believing.
The only way to get around these is by having a reserve of creative fertility in a society set up to exploit it. Rewriting history does not change reality, which always shows up and throws one up in ya, as all societies based on rewriting history have found out. You can get everyone to go to the party meetings or the pyramid sacrifices, but when the economy collapses or the conquistadores show up, your Marxist dialectics or Quetzalcoatl won’t make a fuck. You build a house on quicksand.
——
Civilization by its very nature is unstable, so ..
As far as what I will and will not see, first, it’s irrelevant to whether I’m right or wrong. Second, with the accelerating pace of history in a global world and growing life expectancy for the cognitive elites of the western world, who knows?
—–
Your so called ‘cognitive’ elite are actually closed social networks of circle jerkers who got lucky. Luck is not competence..
Third, if all goes well, I’m hoping to have a bunch of kids, which isn’t an ambition you seem to share; if I don’t see the future, they or their children will.
——
Try it..
One more thing. You advocate for the devil and wish to see his rule on earth, as currently seen in Zimbabwe or South Africa; your hate, pride, sexual greed and emptiness cause you to prefer a hellish future where those who hurt your feelings will be extinct over one where you must coexist with them. Your world revolves around the shaft of your cock, and being a logical, intelligent man, you derive the only possible worldview: a satanic one. What I’d like to say is this: your master has never delivered; he is the father of lies. Your worldview has never brought anything good for its adherents in the long run, and is a dead end. You hurt yourself by thinking like this more than you do those you hate and their civilization.
—-
I do not care about something that is not profitable to me.
If you’re talking about lack of altruistic cooperation, there’s a Russian saying that goes “if I give to everybody, my giver will fall off.” In other words, there’s opportunity cost.
—-
Your type is not a profitable growth opportunity. Look at the demographic profile.
Also, it’s “worse,” not “worser.” You’re proposing that it’s worse for me to not share my paycheck with you than it would be for me to jack you for your shit? Right…
—–
Whatever..
Civilization is unstable, but some civilizations are fertile, while others are fallow. You, with your shallow egotism, saying “I don’t care if something is good if it doesn’t directly profit me in the short term,” are a partisan of a sterile mindset. It’s not even intelligent egotism, since you would lose out massively in the event of our system collapsing; you’re being willfully obtuse.
—–
I am interested in ensuring that people with your attitude go extinct, even if it hurts me.
If you believe that members of our cognitive elite such as Richard Feynman, Bill Gates, Sreve Jobs and those running other Forbes 500 companies are closed social networks of social jerkers, you’re smoking crack.
—–
Read their biographies. Their opportunities were due to the social privilege of their parents, and their competence was maybe the third factor after parental wealth.
These are our cognitive elites, not some Skull and Bones douches, and they got where they are/were by creating more value than your average million Third Worlders create in their lifetimes.
—–
If they are your cognitive elite, YOU are fucked.
Do you really only see women as sex objects?
—–
Yes.
I stopped seeing them as anything else a long time ago.
Was there a defining a event or did you just slowly build up your world view over time?
——
Search older articles on my blog with the text string ‘dark side’.
The demographic profile is not uniform, nor is there anything to say that the current trend will continue ad infinitum. You can extrapolate the temperature changes of the three hours after sunset to Iceball Earth, too, but you’re leaving out a few factors.
—-
It does not have to, but who is changing it? You?
I doubt that you have the ability to contribute to the exctinction of anything but your own bloodline.
—-
But you guys are doing such a good job of hanging yourselves.
And what attitude is it that you find so objectionable? The idea that the carriers of Western culture have been more productive than any of their peers and that their existence has intrinsic value? You’ve got a eunuch’s hatred, born of envy.
—–
Your sin is associating culture with race.
As far as the people I’ve listed, you’re talking out of your ass. Do youself a favor, and read Feynman’s bio.
—–
Who cares? He saw only one facet of reality..
The Mormons are doing pretty good maintaining a high birthrate while remaining productive and resisting our toxic pop culture, for instance. As for me, I’m still in my late twenties, so it’s a bit early. I do cone from a family of four children, and have been plowing some fertile fields in the last few years.
Your neck is in the same noose.
Associating culture with ethnicity (not race) is not my sin; it’s REALITY. Ethinicity is flexible, but within limits. It’s astounding that this causes such a hate-filled reaction from you. I’ll take the high road and not speculate on what this says for your chances of inheriting the culture whose creators and bearers you have such hatred for, but will point out that its pinnacle, the Victorians, never had such resentment born of envy for any of the cultures they came into contact with.
You’re changing your horses in midstream here. Also, you are speaking out of your ass when you speak of Feynman, who, if anything, was an uber-rennaisance man: not only was he a key physicist in the Manhattan Project in his early 20s and a Nobel Prize winner, he later became an accomplished painter, musician, and educator. He also was the first man I know of to write about game. Do yourself a favor and read his autobiography.
“In most non-western cultures women are openly appreciative of attention and more than willing to give sex to get attention, pleasure, some security and companionship.”
I would be interested in reading some concrete examples / experiences of what you mean. I haven’t found this to be the case.