An interesting graphic (click to enlarge) from a good article in the American: Science Turns Authoritarian
Though I am not a fan of right-wing or left-wing sources, this article does make a very good point.
In a Wired article published at the end of May, writer Erin Biba bemoans the fact that “science” is losing its credibility with the public. The plunge in the public’s belief in catastrophic climate change is her primary example. Biba wonders whether the loss of credibility might be due to the malfeasance unearthed by the leak of emails from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom, but comes to the conclusion that malfeasance isn’t the cause of the public’s disaffection. No, people have turned against science simply because it lacks a good public relations outfit. Biba quotes Kelly Bush, head of a major PR firm, on the point.
“They need to make people answer the questions, What’s in it for me? How does it affect my daily life? What can I do that will make a difference? Answering these questions is what’s going to start a conversation,” Bush says. “The messaging up to this point has been ‘Here are our findings. Read it and believe.’ The deniers are convincing people that the science is propaganda.”
Pushing “science” in that manner crosses over into the realm of propaganda- with serious religious overtones.
In the past, scientists were generally neutral on questions of what to do. Instead, they just told people what they found, such as “we have discovered that smoking vastly increases your risk of lung cancer” or “we have discovered that some people will have adverse health effects from consuming high levels of salt.” Or “we have found that obesity increases your risk of coronary heart disease.” Those were simply neutral observations that people could find empowering, useful, interesting, etc., but did not place demands on them. In fact, this kind of objectivity was the entire basis for trusting scientific claims.
Science used to be objective, unlike religions.
To see if our suspicions were correct, we decided to do a bit of informal research, checking Lexis Nexis for growth in the use of what we would categorize as “authoritarian” phrasing when it comes to scientific findings. We searched Nexis for the following phrases to see how their use has changed over the last 30 years: “science says we must,” “science says we should,” “science tells us we must,” “science tells us we should,” “science commands,” “science requires,” “science dictates,” and “science compels.”
Compare this to a part from the catholic prayer for exorcism.
The sacred Sign of the Cross commands you, as does also the power of the mysteries of the Christian Faith.
The glorious Mother of God, the Virgin Mary, commands you; she who by her humility and from the first moment of her Immaculate Conception crushed your proud head.
The faith of the holy Apostles Peter and Paul, and of the other Apostles commands you.
The blood of the Martyrs and the pious intercession of all the Saints command you.
So what exactly are we trying to exorcise? certainly not ignorance or stupidity? The current aim of ‘science’ is exorcising free-thought and inquiry. That is not a typo.. yes, I said-
The current aim of ‘science’ is exorcising free-thought and inquiry.
The belief that women will reward your kindness towards them is a major stumbling block towards getting pussy, as many of you are no doubt know by now. While most of you see that as a reason to not be not nice towards them, very few explore the other side of the scale.
Would rudeness get your more pussy?
Let me be the first to say that rudeness based on pure vindictiveness might not work that well. But what about being rude about something in an objective manner. What I am suggesting is more than a ‘neg’ but less than calling her a slut with a pus-filled cunt. Nor is it frequent enough to be seen as stalking-type or overtly sociopathic behavior.
Let me explain with examples:
1] Girl is large framed, chubby but not morbidly obese.
You can say: “If you lost weight it would help you knees over the long run”.
This statement is not openly nasty, but you are conveying a few things- she is fat, she is getting old and she is not doing anything about her weight. Say this with a straight face, eye contact and a smirk, then enjoy the results. She simply cannot reply without making an idiot of herself- providing you hold your line.
2] Girl is an average looking waitress.
You can say: “You could probably make more money at some nightclub, if you got implants and some plastic surgery”.
This statement is borderline hostile, but if said calmly and with fake sincerity is truly evil. She cannot ignore the statement, but there is really no way to reply to it without digging herself in a hole.
3] Girl has skin disease, bad acne or some skin condition (even lots of freckles).
You can say: “Most guys would have to drink a couple of beers to ignore (insert skin condition), right?”
Once again, this statement is borderline hostile and you are making fun of her disability. It helps to picture every woman who rejected you and then focus that attitude on her. But do not retreat regardless of her reaction.
4] Make fun of her career.
If she is a teacher, mention that the education system is a tool of indoctrination. If she has an average government or non-profit job, point out that such jobs are welfare for women. If she has a job in the tech sector, wonder if it is was to satisfy a gender quota. If she is in the healthcare sector, feel free to point out that many in that sector are overpaid, uncaring clock-punching sadists. Be creative, but also stick to facts.
But remember this-
a] Such insults are best done after you have established some rapport. Don’t open up by telling her she is a piece of crap.
b] Be OBJECTIVE when you insult women, always. It is much easier to defend an objective position.
c] NEVER apologize, Ever!
d] If the woman tries to label you as rude, bitter, a loser etc- stick to your guns and point out that you were being objective.
e] If she tries to call you out on anything, just say that you do not care about it or her opinion.
f] If she says “that is why you are single”- point out that the escorts you bang, who look much better than her, are also much better behaved.
g] If she starts crying, just walk away.
h] Always factor white knight intervention- and be pretty blunt that you are being objective and do not care about being nice to either the woman or him. Just walk away.
g] Calibrate your rudeness to the circumstances.
Will write more in the next part of this series.
A collection of drawings- naughty girls getting their just deserts.