The GI Bill Was Affirmative Action for Poor Whites

One popular CONservative meme goes something like this-

“White men never benefited from affirmative action”

While there are many ways to poke a hole in this myth, let me select one- The GI Bill

So what was the GI Bill and why was it introduced?

The G.I. Bill (officially titled Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944, P.L. 78-346, 58 Stat. 284m) was an omnibus bill that provided college or vocational education for returning World War II veterans (commonly referred to as G.I.s) as well as one year of unemployment compensation. It also provided many different types of loans for returning veterans to buy homes and start businesses. Since the original act, the term has come to include other veteran benefit programs created to assist veterans of subsequent wars as well as peacetime service.

The G.I. Bill was created to prevent a repetition of the Bonus March of 1932 and a relapse into the Great Depression after World War II ended.

What was its effect?

An important provision of the G.I. Bill was low-interest, zero down payment home loans for servicemen. This enabled millions of American families to move out of urban apartments and into suburban homes. Prior to the war the suburbs tended to be the homes of the wealthy and upper class.

Sounds like welfare, ohhh.. if is was for whites, it cannot be welfare?

Another provision was known as the 52–20 clause. This enabled all former servicemen to receive $20 once a week for 52 weeks a year while they were looking for work. Less than 20 percent of the money set aside for the 52–20 Club was distributed. Rather, most returning servicemen quickly found jobs or pursued higher education.

But wait, what about the IQs of working class whites? Why educate them?

A cursory look at the available statistics reveals that these later bills had an enormous influence on the lives of returning veterans, higher education, and the economy. A far greater percentage of Vietnam veterans used G.I. Bill education benefits (72 percent) than World War II veterans (51 percent) or Korean War veterans (43 percent). Moreover, because of the ongoing military draft from 1940 to 1973, as many as one-third of the population (when both veterans and their dependents are taken into account) could potentially have benefited from the elaborate and generous welfare system created by the expansion of veterans’ benefits.

Hmm.. sounds like welfare for working class whites.

Whereas the G.I. Bills of 1944 and 1952 were given to compensate veterans for wartime service, the Veterans Readjustment Benefits Act of 1966 forever changed the nature of military service in America by extending benefits to veterans who served during times of war and peace. At first there was some opposition to the concept of a peacetime G.I. Bill. President Dwight Eisenhower had rejected such a measure in 1959 after the Bradley commission concluded that military service should be “an obligation of citizenship, not a basis for government benefits.”

But the original GI Bill benefit blacks? African-Americans and the G.I. Bill

Due to the prevailing social climate that existed in the United States after World War II, one in which racism was a prominent factor, African-Americans did not benefit from the provisions of the G. I. Bill of Rights as much as their white counterparts. Though the bill did provide a more level playing field than the one blacks faced during Reconstruction, this is not saying much. Representative John Elliott Rankin, an economic liberal who was also an avid segregationist and racist, sponsored the bill in the United States House of Representatives. Although the law did not specifically advocate discrimination, the social climate of the time dictated that the law would be interpreted differently for blacks than for whites.

Not only did blacks face discrimination once they returned home after the war, the poverty confronting most blacks during the 1940s and 1950s represented another barrier to harnessing the benefits of the G.I. Bill as it made it problematic to seek an education while labor and income were needed at home. The United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), because of its strong affiliation to the all-white American Legion and VFW (Veterans of Foreign Wars), also became a formidable foe to many blacks in search of an education because it had the power to deny or grant the claims of black G.I.s. Additionally, banks and mortgage agencies refused loans to blacks, making the G.I. Bill even less effective for blacks.

The Black middle class failed to keep pace with the white middle class because blacks had fewer opportunities to earn college degrees. In addition to the other obstacles, gaining admission to universities was no easy task for blacks on the G.I. Bill. Most universities had segregationist principles underlying their admissions policies, utilizing either official or unofficial quotas. Even if they could gain admission to universities, public education was in such a poor state for blacks that many of them were not adequately prepared for college level work. Those blacks that were prepared for college level work and gained admission to predominantly white universities still experienced racism on campus.

I am not saying that no blacks benefited from the bill, just that the implementation and social conditions in the 1940s and 1950s favored whites to an extent that it was discriminatory. So what percentage of the post-ww2 white middle class owed its lifestyle and opportunities to the GI bill?

Comments?

  1. Doug1
    October 7, 2010 at 1:49 pm | #1

    What hogwash. The GI bill didn’t discriminate against blacks so it wasn’t affirmative action for whites, unlike the affirmative action that now exists in federal and state governments, in universities and in corps by EEOC fiat.

    There were loads of black colleges as well.

    Blacks didn’t do well in schools primarily then primarily because blacks are a lot less intelligent that whites, NE Asians, or the thin slice of high caste S.Asians we get in this country. The reasons for this are very likely partly genetic as well as cultural, a great deal of scientific evidence tends to show, no matter how much the liberal media and leftists try to suppress this. With the cultural being partly a feedback from the genetic differences.

    • A Equals A
      October 7, 2010 at 9:50 pm | #2

      Doug1 :
      What hogwash. The GI bill didn’t discriminate against blacks so it wasn’t affirmative action for whites, unlike the affirmative action that now exists in federal and state governments, in universities and in corps by EEOC fiat.
      .

      Do you actually have evidence to support your counter-argument or just making an claim?

  2. Doug1
    October 7, 2010 at 1:50 pm | #3

    Blacks still don’t do well in high school with a far lower graduation rate even from dumbed down schools than is true amoung whites and our Asian minorities. Heavily Amerindian Mexicans from their southern states and Central Americans have low rates of HS graduation as well.
    —-

    Compared to jewish people, whites look retarded. So should we use the same logic?

  3. You are a racist prick
    October 8, 2010 at 3:06 am | #4

    You would think that men CONscripted to fight in a war would be due a bit of a break when they went home, wouldnt you? No not you. No, you see this as an example of affirmative action for whites. ALL GI’s had the same opportunities, regardless of color. It just so happened that the vast majority where white. Kind of like the vast majority of the people that built this country. I cannot believe you would think fucking war veterans should not be given a helping hand!!!

    You are a sad, disgusting individual with a chip on your shoulder. You will never be the equal of anyone because you play the role of the victim perfectly. The world owes you fuck all and just because whites show the level of success you feel denied to you because of your race, does not mean thats the reality of the situation. Maybe you are just a useless piece of shit who cant compete. This is why we need laws and legislation to give those who are not white a “fair” chance. Left to their own devices and without state intervention, they will continue to fall behind it seems. This is the message that AA sends to me at least.

    Many of those GI’s went to South Korea. Many of them stopped the Japs raping and pillaging their way through Asia. Maybe you would prefer to live somewhere like Burma? What about North Korea? I hear that workers rights are fucking superb in China.

    Kindly go fuck yourself, you racist, ignorant fucking dimwit. Better yet pack your bags and fuck off to a place where you feel a little less hard done by you ungrateful, self entitled weakling.

  4. Doug1
    October 8, 2010 at 5:39 pm | #5

    DA–

    Yes Ashkenazi Jewish (the kind we almost exclusively have in the US, as opposed to Mizrahi and Sephardic Jews) IQ is on average considerably higher than that of other whites. It’s about 110 +/- 2, or 2/3 of a SD. Black IQ is 85 +/-2, or 1 full standard deviation. Non Ashkenazi Jews have on average IQs a little lower than the Euro average.

  5. Doug1
    October 8, 2010 at 5:40 pm | #6

    Jewish IQ is sometimes said to average 115 and a few studies have shown that but most do not.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_intelligence

  6. Steve
    October 9, 2010 at 7:44 am | #7

    nice trick. Equating financial federal subsidies on the basis of military service to federal subsidies based uniquely on race.

    If one racial group was not allowed/discouraged to join military service, it is effectively racial discrimination.

    While the US armed forces today are probably the most racially integrated in the world, it was not always so (especially prior to the 1950s).

  7. October 9, 2010 at 11:28 am | #8

    I’m no particular supporter of the GI Bill, but the Wikipedia entry you cite with the implication that it proves that the GI Bill was in some way discriminatory against blacks does no such thing. It does say that conditions for blacks in the U.S. were worse than they were for whites, which apparently made it harder for blacks than for white to make use of the GI Bill. Even if that’s true, that’s a long way from making the case that the Bill discriminated against blacks. Then it goes on to say that the GI Bill kicked black enrollment levels in college way up and laid the groundwork for the black middle class, which sounds like it’s contradicting itself.

    The question is- Were poorer whites never the beneficiary of large welfare or affirmative action programs ?

    FWIW, I know an old black guy who made great use of the GI Bill — got a college education paid for by it, and even spent a few years living cheap in France on it.

  8. Doug1
    October 9, 2010 at 2:57 pm | #9

    You dishonestly omitted the two concluding paragraphs of the Wikipedia article you cited and quoted extensively from.

    Though blacks encountered many obstacles in their pursuit of the benefits offered by the G.I. Bill, there were positive aspects of the law for the African American community as well. The bill greatly expanded the population of African Americans attending college and graduate school. In 1940, enrollment at Black colleges was 1.08% of total U.S. college enrollment. By 1950 it had increased to 3.6%. Additionally, the bill led to the passage of the Lanham Act of 1946, which provided for the federal funding of improvement and expansion of HBCUs.

    As [Hilary Herbold] writes, “Clearly, the G.I. Bill was a crack in the wall of racism that had surrounded the American university system. It forced predominantly white colleges to allow a larger number of blacks to enroll, contributed to a more diverse curriculum at many HBCUs, and helped provide a foundation for the gradual growth of the black middle class.” Not only did the G.I. Bill provide the foundation for the black middle class, it educated the generation of African Americans who would help spearhead the American Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Americans_and_the_G.I._Bill

    Note that the article has a Wiki warning flag attached to it, indicating quality problems. Most of it is highly tendentious rather than even handed – the parts you quoted. (E.g. the science on the subject has shown for the last 100 years that blacks have much lower IQs than whites and drop out of high school a much higher rates – that is a good part of why even now with extensive affirmative action for blacks their rates of college graduation are much lower than whites.)

  9. 72mike
    February 3, 2011 at 8:12 pm | #10

    Your discussions degenerate because you will never be able to convince racist-entrenched minds; their mind is made up. Your attempts only make them dig in their heels, fueling their rants. And your language… Most of you make me weep. Let them die out as quick as they will, taking their antiquated points of view with them. Stop stooping to their level.

  10. Athlone McGinnis
    September 5, 2011 at 8:54 am | #11

    72mike :
    Your discussions degenerate because you will never be able to convince racist-entrenched minds; their mind is made up. Your attempts only make them dig in their heels, fueling their rants. And your language… Most of you make me weep. Let them die out as quick as they will, taking their antiquated points of view with them. Stop stooping to their level.

    Amen.

  11. JIM
    April 5, 2012 at 10:43 am | #12

    To say that any system created, controled and run by all whites was not racist is assenine. Was the GI Bill descriminatory against poeple of manority groups, Yes! Just because you are “White”, you’re not going to see the descrimination that accures agains poeple of color even today. Is the military and the GI Bill a great program, Yes! But it was built on a foudation of improving the lives of White Service Members. People of color didn’t have the right to vote, didn’t have the right to even keep their seat in a bus. If you don’t vote, the people in power don’t care about you… And thoughs people at the time didn’t have that aporutunity.

  12. SAM
    May 18, 2012 at 8:20 am | #13

    Unfortunately, “rants” will continue with the purpose of denying the history of this country when it comes to people of color. Rants of black and brown people being less intelligent than whites or being inferior in other areas (even in sports) has been disproved constantly.

    As far the G.I. Bill is concerned, that bill could not “force” colleges to enroll blacks or force banks to provided mortgages to people of color. Black and brown people still had to face discrimination from these institutions.

  13. iboosson
    January 21, 2013 at 8:25 am | #14

    Academic peer-reviewed studies of racial disparities in the G.I. Bill and other “race-neutral” government programs dating back to at least the Homestead Act are beyond conclusive. Here is but one example from a scholar (not just some guy with an opinion rooted in spurious “data”) who actually intensively studied racial disparities in the G.I. Bill (taken from the NYT in 2005):

    But Katznelson demonstrates that African-American veterans received significantly less help from the G.I. Bill than their white counterparts. ”Written under Southern auspices,” he reports, ”the law was deliberately designed to accommodate Jim Crow.” He cites one 1940′s study that concluded it was ”as though the G.I. Bill had been earmarked ‘For White Veterans Only.’ ” Southern Congressional leaders made certain that the programs were directed not by Washington but by local white officials, businessmen, bankers and college administrators who would honor past practices. As a result, thousands of black veterans in the South — and the North as well — were denied housing and business loans, as well as admission to whites-only colleges and universities. They were also excluded from job-training programs for careers in promising new fields like radio and electrical work, commercial photography and mechanics. Instead, most African-Americans were channeled toward traditional, low-paying ”black jobs” and small black colleges, which were pitifully underfinanced and ill equipped to meet the needs of a surging enrollment of returning soldiers.

    The statistics on disparate treatment are staggering. By October 1946, 6,500 former soldiers had been placed in nonfarm jobs by the employment service in Mississippi; 86 percent of the skilled and semiskilled jobs were filled by whites, 92 percent of the unskilled ones by blacks. In New York and northern New Jersey, ”fewer than 100 of the 67,000 mortgages insured by the G.I. Bill supported home purchases by nonwhites.” Discrimination continued as well in elite Northern colleges. The University of Pennsylvania, along with Columbia the least discriminatory of the Ivy League colleges, enrolled only 46 black students in its student body of 9,000 in 1946. The traditional black colleges did not have places for an estimated 70,000 black veterans in 1947. At the same time, white universities were doubling their enrollments and prospering with the infusion of public and private funds, and of students with their G.I. benefits.

    Katznelson argues that the case for affirmative action today is made more effectively by citing concrete history rather than through general exhortations. Studying the New Deal, the Fair Deal, the Great Society and the civil rights movements of the 1960′s could not be more relevant at a time when the administration seems determined to weaken many of the federal programs that for decades have not just sustained the nation’s minorities but built its solid middle class. Whether or not Katznelson’s study directly influences the affirmative action debate, it serves an important purpose. With key parts of the Voting Rights Act set to expire in 2007 and other civil rights protections subject to change, we must understand a continuing reality: the insidious and recurrent racial bias in the history of American public life…

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 70 other followers

%d bloggers like this: