NSFW Links: May 14, 2011

These links are NSFW.

iPhone SelfShots: May 12, 2011 NekkidCuties

iPhone SelfShots: May 12, 2011 Nudie Cuties

Smartphone Self-Shots: May 14, 2011 NekkidCuties

Smartphone Self-Shots: May 14, 2011 Nudie Cuties

Tumblr: nekkidcuties.tumblr.com/archive/

Enjoy!

Two Minutes of Hate: May 14, 2011

Have a look at this scene from the movie version of ‘1984‘.

now compare it to this clip of the celebrations after the announcement of bin Ladens death

Disturbing, isn’t it? Comments?

Why do LIEbertarians Defend Systems which Fuck Them?

I have noticed something odd about the morons who self identify as LIEbertarians.

They enthusiastically support institutions, people and ideologies who screw them every single day.

Some of you might say- but so do CONservatives. While that is correct, the vast majority of CONservatives are too dumb, ignorant and plain fucking stupid. Just as retarded kids have lower culpability for their actions, CONservatives siding against their own interest is sorta expected. However, a significant percentage of LIEbertarians are not retarded morons and are, in fact, capable of some degree of rational thought. So why do they often behave in a manner identical to CONservatives?

The answer lies in their motivations.

CONservatives and LIEbertarians share a common set of desires grounded in a zero-sum worldview. Though they may deny it, the actions of LIEbertarians show that they support a steal-and-con somebody else to gain a bigger piece of an never-increasing pie. They believe in secular religions such as Austrian Economics, Randism rather than traditional ones like right-wing versions of Christianity.

What is the difference between quoting from, say, Hayek or some paragraph from a religious book if they both support the same bullshit? Does a suit confer more respectability on its wearers opinion than a religious garment? Does university education confer more respectability than a monastic order? Economics is less reputable than astrology, numerology or entrail reading. Believing in any economic theory irrespective of what you see around you is blind faith.

If you are going to believe in mumbo-jumbo, why not believe in versions which will give you returns tomorrow rather than 30 years from now?

Comments?