Why the Ongoing Loss in Income Security is a New Creature: 1

There are a few major and fundamental differences in the life experiences of people born after 1970s and those born before it. While the lack of large wars, normalization of effective contraception, mainstream feminism, decent nutrition and health care are the most well known differences- there is one we rarely talk about. It is-

The loss of income/ livelihood security.

Read that again.. I did not say lack of income or livelihoods, merely that both are less stable than in any previous era in human history. The type of income/ livelihood insecurity we see today (especially if you are young) was inconceivable in peaceful periods throughout human history.

There is simply no equivalent for the current state of income insecurity, due to the magnitude of the problem and change in social parameters.

Let me explain the “change in social parameters” part a bit more explicitly.

Civilization as you know it has always been a ponzi scheme based on exploiting a youth heavy demographic profile. However fairly basic technology, public health measures, sanitation and effective contraception have caused a voluntary worldwide decline in fertility thereby destroying the source of fresh suckers to ‘compete’ against each other and keep the scam going. Now add in the effects of individual alienation, loss of social cohesiveness, feminism, atomization, technology etc- something that is far more common in those born after 1970.

So how do these changes interact with the loss of income/ livelihood security?

The short answer is that they amplify the effects of income insecurity and will make the endgame that much worse. The somewhat longish answer is-

Imagine that you were a man of working age in any relatively peaceful period of human history. It is very likely you would have been involved in doing something alongside people who were related to you or otherwise very familiar. Though your ‘peoplesphere’ would have been limited to a few hundred people in your direct and indirect circle of acquaintances, your mental grasp of the world around you would have been very good. While things did go to hell during wars, epidemics, famines etc it was not the default state of affairs. For most of the time- things were reasonably predictable, secure and you were always surrounded by people who were very likely to help you.

The industrial revolution and urbanization did not change that to any significant extent. There is a reason you could find entire blocks, neighborhoods and cities filled with people who came from the same part of the world and were related to each other. Even people with marginal employment and skills could aspire to a reasonably secure existence by being part of a larger group. However the direction of social and economic evolution after WW2 created an atomized and physically disconnected society. The reasons behind that shift are not important for the purpose of this post- but the results are.

Today most of us live around, work and socialize with people who we hardly know or trust. The funny thing is that we are very aware of this fact but pretend that it is irrelevant.

So how does existing around people you don’t trust affect your behavior and attitudes? and what does this have to do with loss in income/ livelihood security?

Answer: We don’t trust people around us under the most optimal of conditions, let alone under less than optimal ones. The true extent of its impact on society was temporarily obscured by the prosperity, growth and social changes which occurred after WW2. As I have said before, people will play along and seemingly accept incredibly fucked up systems as long as they believe that doing so is profitable- and that was the case for almost 50 years.

But the last decade has slowly but irreversibly exposed the lies, bullshit, scams and lunacy behind the promises for progress- let alone maintaining the status quo. We are now in a peculiar situation where the pre-1950 system have been trashed beyond repair AND its replacement is falling apart before our eyes.

I will write about the likely chain of effects of this situation in the next part of this series. But first I have to write follow ups to a couple of posts from the last two weeks.

Comments?

  1. Nestorius
    October 10, 2011 at 4:11 pm

    “Today most of us live around, work and socialize with people who we hardly know or trust.”

    This is what Westerners usually call being civilized.

  2. MeMyselfI
    October 10, 2011 at 4:27 pm

    I think maybe you are mistaken…

    Up until the post WWII era most of civilization was agricultural based for income and security… and very much at the mercy of weather, floods, pestilence, etc. MOST of the recorded history of civilization understood significant insecurity.

    It is the most recent generation or two that is the blip on the radar of human history. Things will be returning to _normal_ very shortly, that’s all.

  3. S. Thompson
    October 11, 2011 at 2:57 pm

    What about Ray Kurzweil’s Singularity? If we hold on for a bit longer, endless prosperity awaits!


    IF we start distributing wealth.

  4. Octavian
    October 11, 2011 at 11:27 pm

    another great observation. this is slowly creating a culture clash between generations. and the natural result is:

    http://www.antifeministtech.info/2011/09/deny-grandchildren/

    and women making lots of noise in the media:

    http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/11/all-the-single-ladies/8654/?single_page=true

    popcorn. free internet tv stream. sit back and watch.

  5. Commander Shepard
    October 13, 2011 at 1:50 am

    You’re my favorite blogger, AD and pieces like this are why. You’ve got your finger on the trends better than anyone else online.

  6. Remorhaz
    October 16, 2011 at 2:53 pm

    The former Soviet Union had a system like this for 80 years as I recall. Neighbors did not trust neighbors as anyone could be a spy and anyone could report you for any number of crimes. It is amazing how long people will tolerate tyranny. The only difference between that and now is the tremendous racial mixing so throw in a dash of violent crime with your totalitarian kleptocratcy.

    How did that work out? If not, why not?

  1. October 27, 2011 at 3:06 pm
  2. February 18, 2012 at 1:48 pm
  3. March 26, 2012 at 9:00 am
  4. August 25, 2012 at 1:36 pm
  5. October 11, 2012 at 10:51 pm
  6. October 23, 2012 at 10:10 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 106 other followers

%d bloggers like this: