Home > Uncategorized > An Unusual TIME Cover Photo

An Unusual TIME Cover Photo

So this is the cover photo for the US edition of TIME magazine (May 21, 2012). I am not going to say much more than that. BTW, I got the picture in this post from- Mom Puts Boob in Preschooler’s Mouth on Cover of Time.

Update: Here are some more pictures from that article.

Comments? Come on.. you know you want to.

Categories: Uncategorized
  1. Nestorius (A. Hourani)
    May 10, 2012 at 2:24 pm

    “Jamie herself breastfed until age six.”

    This explains this. But still why? Really why?

    • P Ray
      May 10, 2012 at 5:44 pm

      Get guys hooked on boobs to stave off MGTOW?
      That may also be a plan…

  2. May 10, 2012 at 7:16 pm

    hahahaha,

    diablo, have any of your “ladyfriends” lactated, did you partake dirty man?

  3. InT
    May 10, 2012 at 10:46 pm

    “I’ve breastfed Aram at the Playboy mansion. I actually felt it was the most appropriate place on earth to do it.”

  4. hans
    May 11, 2012 at 12:56 am

    Jesus Christ!
    That poor boy will NEVER live that down as long as there is an internet.

    Fucking stupid attention whoring cunt of a mother..

    • Ulick McGee
      May 11, 2012 at 2:50 am

      Amen to that brother. Guarantee you it never occurred to that ridiculous fool.

    • Conquistador
      May 12, 2012 at 9:42 pm

      In ten years that kid is gonna kill himself from the non-stop teasing. You read it here first.

  5. May 11, 2012 at 5:55 am

    Is this cover sensationalist? Yes, deliberately. But the fault is Time’s, not that of the women who took the risk of being photographed (knowing, if they were honest, that they would be objectified and sensationalized).

    Why did they do it? It’s simple – to draw attention to a cause they believe in. If you’re part of an alternative movement, the price of mainstream media attention is being made to look deviant or stupid. It’s often worth it, for the exposure.

    Time’s motivation is also simple: to sell issues.

    As an attachment parenting father, I have no illusions about the imperfections of the cause. Dr. Sears is a very privileged man, which made it easy for him to model a very care-intensive model of parenting. He could afford to “hire help.” There are some ideas floating around in the community that I profoundly disagree with. For example, some attachment theory parents don’t vaccinate. I think that’s a terrible, even destructive idea.

    On the other hand, most non-western societies let children continue to breastfeed for at least two years, often much longer, and the scientific consensus is that this very beneficial. Despite what the cover image of Time implies, this isn’t about forcing kids to breastfeed. It’s about letting them wean gradually (like all other mammals do), rather than kicking them off the boob at six weeks or a year or any other arbitrary date.

    Of course, some men find that threatening, as they view women’s breasts as existing for their sexual pleasure. I like tits – most men and many women do. That said, “tits” are mammaries, as in the same root word as “mammals”, and they evolved in order to allow mammals to feed their young.

  6. hoipolloi
    May 11, 2012 at 8:56 am

    Time has arrived for Time to be a tabloid. Print journalism on the whole is gasping for breath.

    The subject matter on the cover is a non-issue as far as I am concerned.

  7. ant
    • Conquistador
      May 12, 2012 at 9:44 pm

      Adoption especially of the non-white variety is a status symbol among SWPL.

  8. May 12, 2012 at 7:27 pm

    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/05/11/time-magazine-cover-forget-breast-what-about-boy/

    “This is self-centeredness at its worst, sold as good parenting. And this is an act of media violence against a child, committed by adult journalists who also commandeered his will (as did his mother), for sensation and profit. Rarely do we get such evidence of how wrong parenting can go, how poorly journalists can behave and how slow we can be to recognize ugliness when it is disguised as something beautiful.”

    • fukaname
      May 22, 2012 at 5:43 am

      well said.

  9. fukaname
    May 22, 2012 at 5:42 am

    Time magazine is Rockefeller

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 96 other followers

%d bloggers like this: