Home > Dystopia, Escorts, Secular Religions > Escorts are a better deal than ‘real’ women- III

Escorts are a better deal than ‘real’ women- III

In my previous post, I touched on two common scenarios where escorts offer better value for money than ‘real’ women. I will explore that stream of thought further with a couple of more examples.

A guy, in his 20s-40s, who is fairly successful at playing the field.

You might think that a man in this position might be the least likely to benefit from using escorts. While that is partially true, there are some important issues which are often glossed over.

Is the guy getting what he wants? or is he just happy to be getting more than others? Given the nature of women, their attitudes, moodiness, mind games etc, such a guy probably spends more time trying to ‘be on top’ than enjoying life. There is more to life than chasing women and spouting Darwinian determinism. If your whole life is a series of shit-tests and challenges till you can no longer keep with the competition, is your existence any more meaningful than a bacteria or flatworm?

Why should the whims of a woman decide if you can bang a particular look or feel? What gives her that power? Some may say her pussy.. but I disagree. It is you who gives her that power by playing along. But do you have to? If you can buy decent sex from a woman who looks like what you want, is it not better than taking what chance put in your path? You can rent a porsche or buy a porsche, either way it beats driving a equally old or new honda civic. Many men make the mistake of believing that they should not aspire to something they cannot buy, and make up justifications for nor renting/ leasing what they like (though they can afford it). Who are you trying to impress? Whose expectations are you trying to live up to? Why not enjoy no-strings, BS-free sex with your fantasy?

A guy in his late 40s and beyond (kids, no kids, married, divorced etc)

So how did playing by the rules and social conventions work out? Hint: Those rules were made to screw you! What did you achieve in your life, and was it worth it? Now you are either married (on a leash), divorced (and abused) or single (and lonely). If you are married, you know that you have no say. You spend your waking hours submitting to the whims of a woman who looks much worser than when you married her. Ironically, her attitude has gotten worser and more demanding (because she has you by the balls). If you are divorced, you probably spend your time cursing yourself about your choice, paying alimony + child support, and try to play nice with your ex (otherwise you will lose access to your kids).

If you are still single, you have escaped the two worser fates. However you find it harder to impress women you want to bang. You are now considering dating more mature women (or having them as fuck buddys). Seriously, why should you restrict your choice to women who do not advertise their sexual services? Is your pride in not buying sex worth banging a ‘mature’ pussy? You might digress and point out that a 20- something escort might find you icky and repulsive.

My counterpoint: Women make up reasons to have sex with men, if it advances their status or gets them ‘stuff’. With the possible exception of your birth mother, no woman will ever love you for what you are. You are just her current stepping stone till she can find someone better. Ironically, even older and uglier women believe they are entitled to perpetually climb up the status tree. Women do not like objectivity because it disturbs their delusions. If you do not believe that, just think about your last serious breakup.

On another note..

Why should you have to jump through an infinite hoops to have decent sex? Are you no better than a show dog? In previous eras we let people starve, suffer and die because they were determined to be ‘unworthy’ or ‘lazy’ (when in reality they were just unlucky). But today technology, productivity and a more complex civilization makes it necessary and desirable to not deprive people of such basics. What about decent sex? Is it any different from sewage systems, clean drinking water, food stamps, electric grids and decent public health care? Can you really run a complex civilization, over an extended period of time, without the willing cooperation of almost all participants?

I will explore this issue further in my next post in this series, along with the secondary and tertiary effects of technology and feminism (in our current zeitgeist) on the motivation of men to play for the system. It ties into my views on money and our new priests.

Part 4 is now available: Escorts are a better deal than ‘real’ women- IV

  1. z
    December 18, 2009 at 10:54 am

    AD wrote:

    ” no woman will ever love you for what you are. You are just her current stepping stone till she can find someone better”

    Ive seen a lot of that. They aren’t -all-that way, but a lot of them are. Especially when they are young and hot. Ive told several of the younger guys I know that if she is still wanting to go out to bars with friends after you two are in a ‘official’ relationship and are supposedly ‘boyfriend and girlfriend’, then something is wrong. She is still keeping an eye out and is actively looking to step up.

    As long as our laws let women exit marriages with a big payday, they will continue to look to step up. There is no penalty for doing so. If she was risking losing her marriage and getting no money out of you (and losing her kids), the situation would be different. Those laws “frame” you as a man as a disposable resource. Getting married for some young pretty women is almost like robbing a bank and getting away with it. Its practically an ATM machine for them. It makes them untrustworthy. What I really -love- is how the same women complain about men “not being willing to commit”. Its farcical.

  2. December 18, 2009 at 2:38 pm

    Speaking as a “20s to 40s guy who is fairly successful”, what you guys need to learn is to “flip the script” and act like your typical ghetto lothario. Turn your bitch into an ATM machine. Make her work for any affection you may be handing out. Do like I did. LTR with a girl with big-time abandonment issues who has a decent job and is a little chubby but not too much, because then you can’t get it up when it’s time to pay the bank. Then screw around on her whenever you want and even joke about it with her, talk about other chicks’ hotness around her, tell her constantly she needs to work out/eat less. She pays for most of your stuff, while you always claim to have all these bills. I’ve paid for a date maybe 2 times. That’s when she was extra good.

    AD, you’re right in all you say man. When I stopped being a beta sulker a few years ago like my mom and earlier GF’s tried to make out of me, I just called on the experiences of my cad male relatives, and started playing “sociopath game”. Works like a charm. You have be in the mindset like you’re selling used cars to suckers, but you could care less either way if you make a particular sell, because you know and that ‘customer’ knows that there will be another sucker along any minute.

  3. December 20, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    Women make up reasons to have sex with men, if it advances their status or gets them ’stuff’.

    With the possible exception of your birth mother, no woman will ever love you for what you are.

    You are just her current stepping stone till she can find someone better.
    Ironically, even older and uglier women believe they are entitled to perpetually climb up the status tree.

    Women do not like objectivity because it disturbs their delusions.
    If you do not believe that, just think about your last serious breakup.

    Ugly, but true. That’s why it bears repeating.

  4. Aaron
    December 21, 2009 at 2:02 am

    All this is perfectly true and well said and developed.

    The basic dichotomy is this, simple and clear. If you are after ego validation or a sense of “mastery”or a sense of purpose through control over something, then Game is for you.

    If you are after sex with beautiful women, pure and simple, if you are just after the physical sensation, then without a shadow of a doubt escorts are for you.

    It’s that simple.

    Popular Game bloggers like Roissy and many others characterize themselves as nihilistic hedonists – and have been so characterized by others – but that is completely false. Men like Roissy are not after the pure physical sensation, the hedonistic thrill, of sex with beautiful women. They are out to validate their egos through their ability to get women to fall for them – they achieve a sense of purpose and meaning in life through their ability to “control”the reactions of the opposite sex.

    In Nietschean terms, Roissy and other Gamers are acting out of their Will to Power.

    That is what is so ironic about the Game movement – they claim to no longer pedestalize and idealize women, yet in the end they give women so much power over their egos and sense of purpose and meaning in life, they derive such a heady thrill of intoxicating accomplishment from their ability to manipulate womens reactions – just read Roissy’s site a bit to get a sense of this – that for them woman is God.

    But for anyone who wants JUST sex – escorts all the way.

    • coincidence
      April 6, 2013 at 9:44 pm

      i like ur answer:)

  5. Dalion
    May 21, 2010 at 4:16 pm

    What about the guy who wants not (primarily) sex, or ego, but love, a trusting partner, a relationship?

    “With the possible exception of your birth mother, no woman will ever love you for what you are.”

    No really? Mmh, thats just a broad generalisation, but I can see it to be true in many cases. However, it shouldn’t be NO woman, but MOST women (will NEVER…).
    And it seems like this current self-image and behaviour of (many) women is the same that is continously pushed by the media in ever growing intensity for the last (10, 20?) years. So its not exactly honest for guys to just succumb to equally intensly peddled macho image. Of course, we could all say “ok fuk it, lets just go to the whores for good sex”, BUT good sex with a loved one is always way better than good sex with a “escort”, because you can be yourself and live out your fantasy together with someone you trust, and you can be sure to share this moment and keep it. Now this might sound idealistic for most, and its rather a goal to be achieved than a dayly reality, but for me its a better goal than thinking about which escort to use next week, because i used up all interest for this one…
    A “loved one” is of course not your one-week girlfriend etc…
    And of course, I am all against marriage for money status and the like, and would only consider it after like 10y, when I’m really sure I’m with the right kind of person. Consential affairs is also a option, if not abused by one party.

    • Silent
      June 10, 2012 at 3:18 pm

      Dalion hit the sweet and neglected spot of the artice when he states

      “What about the guy who wants not (primarily) sex, or ego, but love, a trusting partner, a relationship?”

      There is that audience of men who should be heard as well….there is a tendancy to go only to extremes albeit very valid argued extremes.

      to date in this article, we have the following covered:

      1. Men who only want sex and are not in the game = escorts best choice

      2. Men who only want game to feel validated = women in general

      3. Men who want a relationship, partner with whom they can have love, trust, friendship and sex = specific fewer women

      To arrive at option 3, the following realities are implied….not spoken 😉

      1. When single and lonely, needing companionship and feeling understood, ego stroked, it is unlikely a lonely single man will achieve this by picking up a drunk girl in the bar or playing the game since both are antithesis to the man’s current state of mind = escort is best choice.

      2. When seeking compionship or feeling understood (single lonely male) = get together with close friends for talks and drinks = get it off chest = feel better = masterbate to porn or if false, then GO TO ESCORT.

      4. When single, not playing the game but in a good mood but normal women you meet are etiher immature, laying on the attitude or simply ignoring you as if you don’t exist = Escort is best choice.

      5. When single, not playing game and in good or bad mood = throw yourself into work, embetter your life with passions and interests that are specific to your wants.

      6. Do all of the above and a normal woman will show up out of nowhere and be head over heals for you and you won’t even pick up on it until she makes plain signals to you = go all the way with her physically, but observe with great patience her character, behaviour, motivations, drive and whether she meets your TOP 5 MUST-HAVE CANNOT LIVE WITHOUT criteria (depending what you want out of life).

      Does any of the above make some sense?

      I believe the above single male lonely/not always lonely represents the majority of the male population and are often an unheard, unseen and unrecognized reality.

      • P Ray
        June 26, 2012 at 10:31 pm

        When 80% of women are mostly only interested in the top 20% of men …
        any guy they “catch” to marry them after … is not HONESTLY being thought of as a person.
        Just as a guy to fill the role of husband … until she can trade up to her true love.
        Because … if she isn’t in love with him, anything is justified to be with the guy she wants to be with.

      • Sh
        July 26, 2013 at 7:06 am

        Wow, Silent, you hit it right on!

        Nice to finally hear someone cover a broad spectrum of men on a deeper level.

        What you described is exactly my dilemna because it really does depend on a combination of mood and needs as they vary through phases.

        Parts of what devil’s advocate states rings uncomfortably true as well, but trying to find a middle ground at least offers some hope. I almost felt there was nothing left to life when reading the extremes.

        Thanks for the glimmer of hope on this

      • The Plague Doctor
        December 18, 2013 at 8:40 am

        Haha, if you look at the avatars, “Sh” is a sock puppet replying to himself a year later.

      • LR
        July 1, 2014 at 5:27 pm

        Did you actually just use programming code formal logic to define the male satisfaction algorithm??! *slowclap*

  6. LR
    July 1, 2014 at 5:22 pm

    “There is more to life than chasing women and spouting Darwinian determinism. If your whole life is a series of shit-tests and challenges till you can no longer keep with the competition, is your existence any more meaningful than a bacteria or flatworm?

    Why should the whims of a woman decide if you can bang a particular look or feel? What gives her that power? Some may say her pussy.. but I disagree.”

    -You basically just described the whole MGTOW movement right there. There’s players who never really live because of their addiction to women, then there’s MGTOW who do what the fuck they want, whenever they want. This is IMO the top echelon of playerdome, if that’s a word.

  1. December 18, 2009 at 6:23 am
  2. December 20, 2009 at 12:05 pm
  3. December 20, 2009 at 10:53 pm
  4. June 25, 2012 at 3:57 pm
  5. August 2, 2012 at 11:12 am
  6. November 21, 2013 at 2:54 pm
  7. December 18, 2013 at 8:27 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: