Agent Smith: Why do you Persist?

Is most human “reality” intrinsic to the physical form of the universe, or a perception.. a socially reinforced mass delusion?

Ultimately it comes down to what you choose to believe, and your awareness that it is a choice.

Agent Smith: Why, Mr. Anderson? Why do you do it? Why get up? Why keep fighting? Do you believe you’re fighting for something? For more than your survival? Can you tell me what it is? Do you even know? Is it freedom? Or truth? Perhaps peace? Yes? No? Could it be for love? Illusions, Mr. Anderson. Vagaries of perception. The temporary constructs of a feeble human intellect trying desperately to justify an existence that is without meaning or purpose. And all of them as artificial as the Matrix itself, although only a human mind could invent something as insipid as love. You must be able to see it, Mr. Anderson. You must know it by now. You can’t win. It’s pointless to keep fighting. Why, Mr. Anderson? Why? Why do you persist?

Neo: Because I choose to.

  1. January 4, 2010 at 3:00 am

    Are the writers of the Matrix (some Polish-name brothers) atheists? Because this is right out of the “I wish I weren’t an atheist, but there’s no way I could ever believe in God” handbook.
    __________
    The matrix borrows idea from the Christian gnostic tradition, however this scene is influenced by the ‘gita’ (the original version- not the later ‘bhagavad gita’). Note the point where Neo says I choose to (because I believe in it).. the point about human reality being subjective (maya) and the choice to involve oneself (depending on whether you believe it is your destiny or not).

    In the ‘gita’, arjun (the warrior) finally chooses to fight not because he knows it is right (but because he believes in the justness of his cause). The later ‘bhagavad gita’ twists this into “doing your job”, rather than the original concept (because you believe in your cause and believe it is your purpose).

  2. February 13, 2010 at 9:21 pm

    An MIT philosopher mathematically proves that we’re probably living in a simulation, OR (a couple of alternative possibilities): http://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.pdf

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: