Home > Uncategorized > Lyrical Autopsy: Golddigger by Kanye West

Lyrical Autopsy: Golddigger by Kanye West

A new series where I will autopsy the lyrics of well known songs.

In this post:”Golddigger” by Kanye West

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7obhe_kanye-west-gold-digger_music

_____________________________________________________
I will quote blocks of lyrics with my comments below them.

Cutie da bomb
Met her at a beauty salon
With a baby Louis Vuitton
Under her under arm

High maintenance woman.

An’ I gotta take all they bad ass to show-biz
Okay get ya kids but then they got they friends

Kids from previous “relationships”.

If you fuckin’ with this girl then you betta’ be paid
You know why
Take too much to touch her
From what I heard she got a baby by Busta
My best friend say she used to fuck with Usher

A lifestyle that involves having kids of famous, rich or ‘badass’ guys.

18 years, 18 years
She got one of yo’ kids, got you for 18 years
I know somebody payin’ child support for one of his kids
His baby momma’s car crib is bigger than his
You will see him on TV, any given Sunday
Win the Superbowl and drive off in a Hyundai

Child Support = Slavery

She was supposed to buy ya shorty Tyco with ya money
She went to the doctor got lipo with ya money
She walkin’ around lookin’ like Michael with ya money
Shoulda’ got that insured, GEICO for ya moneeey(your money)

Spending alimony and child-support money for..?

If you ain’t no punk holla’ we want pre-nup
WE WANT PRE-NUP!, yeah
It’s something that you need to have
‘Cause when she leave yo’ ass she gon’ leave with half
18 years, 18 years
And on her 18th birthday, he found out it wasn’t his?

Cuckoldry, deception, bait and switch etc. Also note the word “when” not “if”

Now I ain’t sayin’ you a gold digger, you got needs
You want a dude to smoke, but he can’t buy weed
You go out to eat, can’t pay, y’all can’t leave
There’s dishes in the back, he gotta roll up his sleeves
But while y’all washin’, watch him
He gon’ make it to a Benz out of that Datsun
He got that ambition, baby look in his eyes

Women have a parasitic existence.

I know these dude’s ballin, and yeah that’s nice
And they gon’ keep callin’ and tryin’
But you stay right, girl
But when you get on, he leave yo’ ass for a white girl

He will leave you for someone better than you, when he makes it and understands your scam.

Categories: Uncategorized
  1. z
    January 3, 2010 at 5:22 am

    Have you ever noticed how many trashy talk shows like:
    Maury Povitch,(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maury_Povitc
    Jerry Springer (born Gerald Norman Springer, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Springer)
    Ricki Lake (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricki_Lake)
    Jenny Jones (born Janina Stransky- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenny_Jones_(presenter)
    and Montel Williams (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montel_Williams),

    ENDLESSLY have DNA-test televison episodes on their talk shows showing young (usually black) men “busted” by paternity tests? Would this have an effect on perhaps suppressing anyone’s birthrate? Ya’ think?

    A writer at “The Spearhead” called “Hawaii Libertarian” has wrote on his own blog about “Matriarichal Ghettos”. After reading his post on them, Ive concluded that he is pretty much spot-on. Anytime anywhere that any government starts paying women child support, free housing, WIC payments, AFDC payments, gives them free health care and free educations for their children, and treats them as if they are a victim and the sperm donor a criminal, you will see a “matriarichal ghetto” produced. Instead of only one sperm donor being on the hook for them to raise their fatherless-(bastard is the term that used to be used) children, through our taxes, WE ALL are on the hook to pay for their fatherless children, and the attendant social problems produced by the toxic social cocktail of fatherless male children and entitled-fatherless-female-children who know they truly have no fiscal or social responsibility.

    What will the effects be of this? A hypermasculinized, dependent, low-future-time-oriented group, probably within a couple of hundred years. As the genes for the biggest, toughest males keep getting sexually selected for over and over again, the males become more and more masculine with every generation, but the females will also become more masculine with each passing generation. Males have to “show out” to convey status to females for sexual attention and the negative feedback loop begins. I think some rappers like Kanye are figuring out that the cards are sort of stacked against their audience with the present arrangement.

    I simply know one thing is for certain: we cannot afford our present debt obligations for much longer, and spending per person in this civilization is going to have to lessen or we will be slouching toward a real financial crisis of epic proportions someday, even if its 35 years into the future). If we fix some bad laws, we can “make” families form and stay together again and not create these matriarichal ghettos. I bet you will see matriarichal ghettos “form” everywhere feminism is embraced legally and socially accepted within 50 years of its introduction. The evidence from the white underclass in northern Britan is all anyone needs to see. A formerly well-behaved familial group has become a rough-trade-ewbowing-crude-underclass within a mere 40 years of the introduction of this nonsensical social policy.

    My solution? Bring back orphanages for kids that single moms cant support, end child support (implement joint custody in almost all divorces unless one parent has been shown to truly have been very abusive), end alimony after a four-year-period at the longest. Sit back and watch the divorce rate plummet and watch broken families re-form (when the ho’s call their ex’s back, begging for reconciliation), and watch the behavior of the underlcass of all races dramatically improve (as fathers beat their misbehaving son’s asses just like our dad’s did).

    Its pitiful the amount of damage the evil policies of the totalitarian left has been able to do to the underclasses of all races here in the USA. Black out-of-wedlock births were only 25% of total black births 40 years ago. They are now 70% and holding, http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4865449, and in some ghettos are practically at 100%. White out-of-wedlock births are up to 25% now, a number simply unthinkable 40 years ago, when they were quite rare. Native-born-Hispanic out-of-wedlock-births are up to 50%, http://www.theepochtimes.com/news/7-4-30/54701.html.

    My ananlysis of the above data is that you get what you pay for. We are paying for a matriarchy, funded by the rest of us via taxation, and we are getting it.

    Feminism has one more side effect that I didn’t mention above (and probably its truest intent), a below-replacement birthrate.+++++++

    ++++++AD, obviously I ascribe to a “conspiracy theory” of feminsim. I dont deny it either. I think feminsm was “created” in the former Soviet Union, by their psycholgocial operatives as directed by the Kremlin. The first real cheerleaders of feminsm in the USA all had been in or influenced by the Communist-Party-USA (CPUSA) back in the day. Betty Friedan, Bella Abzug, Gloria Steinem, Hanna Arendt, and practically all of the progenitors of early feminism in the United States (and the rest of the West for that matter) had been involved in the Communist Party directly or had been intimately involved with/influenced by the Communist Party. The CPUSA is now known (via the release of the old Soviet Archives) to have been a famously Kremlin-run front from the start. I think “feminism” was simply concocted to destroy the American (and European) family. The failed policies of feminism had been tried in the Soviet Union, and discarded by Stalin when the birhrate there fell, and the behavior of the populace became unacceptable. Stalin may have been pure evil, but he wasn’t a fool. It was simply exported then as a social weapon by the Marcusian (Herbert Marcuse done a lot of damage) left. Our dangerous-underclass-ghettos are the predictable result of the application of these legalized-social policies. The poor did not always behave as they do now, and they weren’t always so dangerous. The psychologists who concocted these folkaways for us knew what they were doing, with malice aforethought. No thinking person could rationally think any other result than the one we have gotten would have followed. The beautiful thing about creating a “movement” is that it will become a self-sustanining thing. Its converts become the new priests, cardinals, and missionaries of that movement, and the real designers of it are soon forgotten and their fingerprints on “it” lost. We all see the left’s “long-march-through-the-institutions” effects now, with lane-brain professors ensconced via tenure at our universities, but what little percentage of the public know to attribute that rotten state-of-affairs to a short, hunchbacked, people-hating, bespectacled, resentful man named Antonio Gramasci? Hardly anyone really, that little creep is mostly forgotten. The true designers of modern feminsim, in my opinion, are equally curtained-off in historical mist.

  2. October 30, 2013 at 6:03 pm

    You’ve got it right.

  1. November 18, 2014 at 8:20 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: