The Dark Side: 5

I have chronicled my move towards the dark side in previous parts of this series, and some other posts. This one is devoted to the tastes, or lack thereof, of women who rejected me.

Some of you might still be under the impression that women who rejected me over the years had better options or higher standards. So read on..

Note- All the women I talk about below were 4s, 5s and low 6s. Not a single one of those described below was a high 6, let alone a 7. In every single case the women, by their own admission, did not stop having sex with that guy. In most cases, they had either recently dated the guy in question or were still occasionally seeing him.

1] Guy pissed in girls mouth while she was blowing him, and then proceeded to piss on her face.

2] Guy pissed in closet of her parent’s house- in front of her parents.

3] Guy had extensive scarring from third degree burns + lived on welfare.

4] Guy who knocked her up later, was homeless.

5] Guy broke into her house after an argument and destroyed her furniture, TV etc (a few).

6] Guy had a kid with another woman, cheated on her and forgot to pick her parents at the airport.

7] Guy had cerebral palsy but normal intelligence.

8] Guy could not get it up more than once every two days.

9] Guy cheated on her, or was cheating on her (very common).

10] Guy had told her that there was no future in their relationship (a few).

11] Guy had a serious criminal record (a few).

12] Guy had ODed and almost died on more than one occasion + had shitty job (a few).

13] Guy had serious gambling addiction (more than a few).

14] Guy was in jail.

15] Guy had deserted her after a brief affair and impregnation (a few).

16] Guy ‘liked’ young children- if you get the drift (two).

17] Guy was a bland 30-something guy, especially if the girl was non-white (many).

18] Husband was no longer sexually interested in her (a few).

19] Guy had borderline mental retardation but good-looking.

20] Guy never had a real job in his life- above minimum wage (a few).

Yes, my patient readers, these are the men who plain women chose to have sex with- over me. To say that this pissed me off during my dry spells, from 20-24, is a gross understatement.

Comments? and feel free to add your own stories.

PS: As you can probably infer from the above, my ability to open a conversation and chat up women was always pretty good. Plus, I was never shy, or apologetic, about my intentions.

  1. the dude
    July 28, 2010 at 10:32 pm

    why call it the dark side when your point is this is the right side
    —-

    Depends on your view point..

  2. Vincent Ignatius
    July 29, 2010 at 5:53 am

    Looks like a lot of these girls went for badboy asshole types.
    —-

    I would have felt less insulted if they had just gone for badboy asshole types. But a guy on welfare with extensive permanent scaring, or a 20-something who could barely get it up.. or even worse- a guy who ‘liked’ children (in that way). Seriously?

  3. Numm
    July 29, 2010 at 6:12 am

    Yeah, I’m with you 100% on this one. I’m totally alright with girls ruining their lives by dating badboys, it gives me a good belly laugh, but good god, dating someone who can’t get it up is sad, and dating a pedophile is disgusting, and supportive of terrible acts.

  4. Herbal Essence
    July 29, 2010 at 11:10 am

    Some ´explanations´
    1. Women are addicted to drama.

    2. Women want other people to feel sorry for her / to rescue her.

    3. The badboy thing, of course, is well-travelled ground.

  5. almost 40 year old virgin
    July 29, 2010 at 5:28 pm

    Excellent observations, you have my heartfelt sympathies for suffering these bimbos. Even as long as it took to build up attraction to them and enough rapport so they told their stories.
    —-

    I only suffered them from 20-24, and often called them out.

    Book of Bonecrker ( http://www.the-niceguy.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=5463 ) describes this deviant phenomenon quite adequately. Recommended reading for any man trying to break through the “nice guy/subservient male” brainwashing.

  6. Y
    July 29, 2010 at 9:55 pm

    Sorry but a had to laugh. Not at you AD, but at these women. I understand its frustrating to be overlooked in favor of someone how isnt as qualified/interesting/whatever but I cant help but feel happy for you. You may see this as rejection/disrespect(which it is) but I see it as dodging bullets. I mean, what kind of woman CHOOSES to date a pedophile and/or retard?

  7. thales
    August 22, 2010 at 11:34 pm

    I think that you should devoutly thank whatever god you worship that you successfully avoided being sucked into any of those toxic vaginas and eventually wised up.
    —-

    I am an atheist, but can see your point.

  8. P Ray
    August 25, 2012 at 4:45 am

    There are 2 more situations to be aware of:
    – When a woman refuses to interact positively with you when she is attractive … means she has rejected you.
    – When you become suddenly attractive to a woman who is:
    past childbearing years
    in a dead-end job
    with no education or a large unpaid student loan
    has health problems
    has mental problems
    has children by other guys

    Sudden reversal of disdain by the younger one, and sudden acceptance by the older one, comes with a price tag that is not immediately apparent.
    If a woman takes a long time to “get to know you better” … she is probably stringing you along. Mainly because “attraction is not a choice” and “calculative love will change when you no longer measure up”

  9. August 25, 2012 at 10:34 am

    3] Guy had extensive scarring from third degree burns + lived on welfare.

    7] Guy had cerebral palsy but normal intelligence.

    20] Guy never had a real job in his life- above minimum wage (a few).

    –This says way more about how crappy you are Mr. Diablo then the men or women you are tearing apart….

    Someone who has injuries or a handicap can still be a quality person deserving of love….

    Also, a man is not his job, #20 says just as much about the crappy economy as his “lack of ambition.”

    • P Ray
      September 9, 2012 at 9:06 am

      If love is deserved, that means love is earned.
      If love is earned, love is a transaction.
      whether money can buy you love depends on where you shop.

      • September 9, 2012 at 9:23 am

        deserve means to be worthy of…

        earn means to receive as return for effort…

        subtle difference, but I’m sure your smart enough to tell….

        anyways you might find this interesting….

        http://www.feministcritics.org/blog/2012/09/05/%E2%80%98sex-at-dawn%E2%80%99-author-debates-bh-founder-noh/

        hehe men as a conduit of resources to women….

      • P Ray
        September 9, 2012 at 8:50 pm

        “deserve means to be worthy of…
        earn means to receive as return for effort…”
        Playing with semantics won’t turn back or change the attitudes of people who think they’ve been shortchanged.

        Marriage/relationships has been the most effective means for most men to have their resources transferred to women.
        Note: women will pay for or reciprocate towards the men they are attracted to, other men get to see a one-way transaction.

  10. October 10, 2013 at 5:14 pm

    That shit is the REAL dark side. Are women that desperate for dick or is the dick that good to where they burn their own bridges? What kind of motherfucker pisses in a closet in front of a woman’s parents? The list of “options” is profoundly disturbing to even the soul of me!

  11. P Ray
    May 19, 2015 at 10:35 am

    Interesting. Explains why most women with average guys hate the average guy.
    Of course, everybody knows that every woman actually has the genius of einstein and the beauty of Skye Ronelle Ferkinstad Stracke. /sarcasm

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3081480/Hell-hath-no-fury-like-woman-scorned-rejected-attractive-man-makes-women-cruel-men.html
    Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned! Being rejected by an attractive man makes women cruel to other men
    Researchers found that being rejected by an attractive man actually makes a woman more likely to turn down an unattractive one
    It is as if distancing herself from the unattractive man helps her retain the idea that she is high status, cushioning the blow of the rejection

    By Sophie Freeman For Mailonline

    Published: 11:44 GMT, 14 May 2015 | Updated: 12:52 GMT, 14 May 2015

    It’s the plotline of many a cheesy rom-com: Woman rejected by a good-looking lothario is scooped up by the Average Joe who’s been waiting in the wings all along.

    But in real life it may be a very different story, according to a study.

    Researchers found that, rather than being grateful for the fall-back option, being rejected by an attractive man actually makes a woman more likely to turn down an unattractive one, and to describe him harshly.
    +2

    Not interested: Scientist say that women who have been rejected distancing themselves from an unattractive man to help her retain the idea that she is high status, cushioning the blow of the rejection

    It is as if distancing herself from the unattractive man helps her retain the idea that she is high status, cushioning the blow of the rejection.

    ‘Participants rejected by the attractive man also derogated the unattractive man even when the unattractive man offered acceptance,’ said the psychologists from the University of Toronto.

    ‘Social psychologists theorise that individuals seek connection following rejection.

    ‘However, accepting connection from a low status other may imply that one is of similarly low status, which may call into question one’s prospects for future acceptance.’

    As usual, if a woman “discovers” you past her fertile age,
    you are being settled for, and will, after marriage, be treated like a dray beast.

    From what I read, it’s not too far of a stretch to say that for many men,
    “wedding cake is the celebration that she’ll never have to do oral, anal or vaginal sex (with you) ever again”.

    • Hmic
      November 3, 2018 at 3:18 am

      It’d a jumble of consciousness-lacking pride, vanity, and, I said it already, self-unconsciousness.

      If you play right you pass on your genes (at a fee depending on what hand nature dealt you and how well you play it), otherwise you don’t.

      Marriages lasted, families and relationships held, because of lack of freedom and options.
      Taken away that the constraints were, the shift towards jungle dynamics was rather neat and rapid.
      Sure, civilized as they are, they have it tirelessly plastered with rationalizations and verbiage, but what it is is, that constraints removed, you have a yucky mixture of battle of the sex, competitive deception, irresponsibility, amorality, and, yes, money costs to stand too :)).

      (Even having to flatter, and compromise with the female’s pride and vanity, is a way of paying her.)

      • hoipolloi
        November 3, 2018 at 7:46 am

        You are spot on – Marriages lasted, families and relationships held, because of lack of freedom and options. This is the secret behind many morals of the past. With the discovery of birth control pill and availability of economic options the jungle dynamics are in.

  12. P Ray
    November 16, 2018 at 5:02 am

    Another good example of a “girl who is too good for an ordinary guy”:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6397339/Student-hairdresser-21-unmasked-gangsters-moll-helped-run-3m-drugs-empire.html
    Student hairdresser, 21, unmasked as gangster’s moll who helped run £3m drugs empire with boyfriend and two brothers is jailed for five years

    Mother-of-one Jessica Lang sent texts to help gang deal drugs in Blackpool. Her boyfriend Scott Le Drew, 31, was jailed for 11 years. Mob bosses Anthony and Bradley Gill face 14 years

    Lel, single mother and boyfriend is a drug dealer.
    Almost as if women are racking up the stupid decisions so that they can then turn up as saggy, sexless entitlement queens later in a church or religious building, to tell the preacher “Find me a man!”

  1. August 1, 2010 at 2:14 am
  2. February 24, 2013 at 6:11 pm
  3. October 5, 2014 at 2:15 pm
  4. October 4, 2018 at 9:36 pm
  5. November 4, 2018 at 9:31 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: