Archive

Archive for August, 2010

Kalinka at FemJoy

August 28, 2010 1 comment

An assorted gallery of Kalinka at FemJoy, she is also known as Isabella A at MetArt.

Categories: Uncategorized

Exposing Flaws in Libertarian Ideology: Aug 28, 2010

August 28, 2010 12 comments

It is much easier to expose the flaws in ideologies by soliciting their views on real world problems. A recent article by Yves Smith (pseudonym) on nakedcapitalism.com asks a very good question which exposes the hollowness of most flavors of libertarianism. As many of you know, inspite of my agreement with some concepts that underlie libertarianism, I do not support that ideology because of its inadequacy at dealing with quirks of human behavior that sabotage its implementation.

What is the Proper Libertarian Response to Concentrated Corporate Power?

A question for readers: in many lines of commerce, large firms often enjoy significant cost and/or revenue advantages relative to smaller players. Over time, these industries tend to evolve to a format where many of the most successful enterprises are very large organizations. These firms typically wield considerable power relative to players smaller than they are, such as employees, suppliers, and customers, and often seek to influence governments. Moreover, many fields of enterprise have considerable barriers to entry, which further entrenches the position of powerful incumbents.

How do libertarians propose to respond to the power of large enterprises?

Feel free to comment- both on this blog and on the parent post.

Don’t Give Relationship Advice to Women

August 28, 2010 5 comments

Many men, including PUAs, have a strange habit.

They try to give, or provide, relationship advice to women.

Why on earth would a sane man do that? Let me explain-

Almost all pre-menopausal women have no interest in anything connected to objectivity. They are NOT interested in any opinion, help, assistance or advice that contradicts their beliefs. When they are asking your advice, what they really want to hear is-

You are the greatest, smartest and hottest woman around- every other woman is stupid, dumb and ugly.

Any response that deviates from that script will either be ignored, violated, held against you or make her start an argument.

Some of you might think you could ‘neg’ or win over a woman by giving her some smartass response. While that could work under some conditions, it is ultimately a doomed mission with increasing effort for decreasing amounts of aging ass.

Some of you might even genuinely want to help some of them (daughter, nieces etc) through such advice. Resist that temptation- as anything you say that contradicts her world-view at that instant will be ignored, trampled and held against you.

The simpler and more logical way out is-

Refuse to give any advice and treat requests for such advice with utter contempt.

While that may be against your social conditioning, ask yourself one question- How any woman who got your advice ever thanked you for it immediately- in any way? Thanking you long after the advice was given, does not count.

Giving a pre-menopausal women ANY advice on relationships (or pretty much anything else) is a thankless, futile and self-destructive endeavor. Don’t step into that shit, unless you enjoy swimming in it- do you?

Treat them with contempt, sit back and enjoy the show. You might actually get more ass that way.

Who gets more ass- a scientist whose discovery changed the world OR your average low-level drug dealer.

Comments?

Zero Sum Behavior and Environmentalism

August 27, 2010 4 comments

Zero sum behavior is a paradigm under which its ‘true’ believers assume the following-

1] Resources are limited.

2] We have found all resources and know everything.

3] Now it is a game of screwing the ‘others’ to remain alive.

While this paradigm and the resultant self-defeating behavior is not unique to any group, race or age- its manifestations and names change. In the secular post-1960 west, it manifests itself through environmentalism.

Let me list some peculiar aspects of environmentalism.

a] The most vocal supporters are aging and affluent whites- the same people who did (and are doing) the most damage to what they seek to protect.

b] They pay lip-service to curbing their own consumption, but wage campaigns to prevent less affluent whites and colored people from living like them.

c] They keep on repeating and regurgitating concepts like population growth, resource scarcity, technological bottlenecks which either are no longer true or have been overcome.

d] They have more sympathy for a predator that kills ‘other’ humans than the humans. Of course they cloak their hate in scientific sounding language, and plead for the conservation of nature.

e] They live in some of the most artificial environments ever created by man, but make appeals to others to live in harmony with ‘nature’.

f] They make up ‘models’ of ‘available’ resource use to show how ‘it is unsustainable’. Factors such as uncertainty of knowledge, changes in resource use and technological advancements do not seem to deter their enthusiasm for fraudulent models and ‘predictions’.

g] They want to make decisions about the lives and future of ‘others’, with the goal of harming them- but pretend otherwise when challenged.

I will write more about this topic in a future post. Let me leave you with one thought..

Should the ‘others’ not see these ‘zero summers’ as a mortal enemy and make every effort to exterminate them and their progeny- something that is likely to happen in one form or another.

Comments?

NSFW Links: 27 Aug, 2010

August 27, 2010 Leave a comment
Categories: Uncategorized

What is the Reward of Social Acceptance?

August 26, 2010 23 comments

Humans beings care about what other think because, for most of history, it mattered.

So tell me something-

Does it still matter? Really?

Almost every single person who expresses any adverse opinion about your actions or thoughts would never help you even if you had never upset him/her in the first place. What others think about you ceased to be important with the development of the first cities, and became inconsequential after post ww2 technological and social changes.

The opinion of others matter only in small isolated groups where you have depend on each other for survival and safety. Once the group size exceeds 10k people- it matters less, 100k- it matters very little, 1 million- it is inconsequential.

Isn’t that the rationale behind ‘game’ in urban areas anyway? So what about using escorts? What is the difference?

Comments?

NSFW Links: 25 Aug 2010

August 25, 2010 Leave a comment

These links are NSFW, so don’t blame me.

Long Haired Cuties from ModelMayhem: 25 Aug 2010

Softcore Cuties: 25 Aug, 2010

Enjoy!

Categories: Uncategorized