Why Lesser Anglo-Saxon Countries Have A Dark Future: 1

I prefer to define lesser Anglo-Saxon countries as those countries which were used to dump poor and retarded anglo-saxons prior to WW2, namely Canada, Australia and New Zealand. In my opinion, their future is much dimmer than that of the USA.

The USA, for all its faults, is not seen by immigrants as a systemically racist society- as far as employment and business opportunities are concerned. In that respect, lesser Anglo-Saxon countries are demonstrably far more discriminatory to immigrants.

It is not widely appreciated that economic discrimination is likely to create far more nastier conflicts that the attitudes of uppity white women.

In Canada, both first generation and second generation non-whites make measurably less than their less-educated white peers. Canucks often try to rationalize this with all sort of bullshit explanation, but nobody who matters cares. White canucks are over represented in the baby-boomer generation and underrepresented in the younger generation (Gen Y- Millenials). Moreover the amount of economic activity necessary to maintain, let alone grow revenue collection, is starting to collapse as these baby boomers pass their maximum income (aka revenue) years and move into their collection (pensions, investments, healthcare) years.

Who is going to pay for them? Why should younger and more-educated nonwhites pay for passive aggressive racist sub-humans? Why not euthanize older Canucks- actively or passively? Why cooperate with their passive aggressive white progeny?

Moving on to Australia.. It is economically somewhat less suckier for immigrants than Canada- but the attitudes of its aging white population do not help their case. They too, like Canada, are overtly dependent on selling their natural resources to other countries- an activity with significant cyclicity. New Zealand is also far too dependent on selling its natural resources and tourism type activities. It appears that racism in NZ is also more similar to Canada (passive-aggressive) than Australia (more overt).

To make a long story short, neither of these three countries have the right socio-economic atmosphere to integrate non-white immigrants to the level where they would defend the system as insiders. As I have often said before, people can detect unfairness and will never fight for a system that is perceived to be treating them as second-class humans or worse.

I will write more based on responses.

Comments?

  1. Will S.
    February 25, 2011 at 10:04 pm

    Ah, excuse me: Asians, both of the Oriental / East Asian variety, and the South Asian / East Indian variety, have done quite fine in Canada, succeeding not only in business but also even in politics, to the point where they are heavily involved, many serving in Parliament and provincial legislatures.

    Government statistics says otherwise.

    NAMs, have indeed not done as well. But then, wherever NAMs are and wherever they go, most of them fail. Which is why there isn’t a First-World NAM country, and few free, democratic NAM nations, and it will ever be thus. NAM countries will always be Third-World hellholes; NAM parts of cities will always be blighted, poor, gun-violence-ridden crack-gang-controlled slums.

    Thanks to having less NAMs up here (outside of urban areas), here in rural Canada, we don’t have gun violence problems like you Yanks; it’s not for lack of ownership of guns in rural areas – in fact, country dwellers have most of the rifles and shotguns – but it’s because of the lack of rural NAMs, thank God. May it stay ever thus…

    WTF do you mean by your statement that Canada, Australia and New Zealand “were used to dump poor and retarded anglo-saxons prior to WW2”? Britain didn’t “dump” any Anglo-Saxons here and in Oceania; rather, Anglo-Saxons immigrated, of their own accord.

    As it is, though, immigrants are taking over the major cities in Canada, because of unchecked immigration and refugee-status-claims – and government-funded ‘multiculturalism’ encourages them to NOT assimilate; it is that, rather than ‘racism’, which threatens social cohesion in this country; and from what I know of our Antipodean cousins, it’s the same down there. Esp. NAMs, who are less inclined than Asians to even try to assimilate…

    As for our future, nobody knows, but we’ve always muddled through. Right now, we have a better economy than you all do, Stateside, and a strong currency – which has its own problems vis-a-vis competitiveness, but is still a sign of a healthy economy…

    “Critical thinking”, my ass.

    • A Equals A
      February 26, 2011 at 12:47 pm

      Newsflash: Indians/South asians are NAM’s according to HBD (they come from a Hot climate)

      I could sound off atleast “NAM” countries with decent per capita incomes and democratic governments. Hell that includes most of the (british) Carribean left off this list.

      Barbados $22,296
      Boswana $14,800
      St Lucia $10,177
      Brazil (mixed with NAMS) $11.289
      South Africa (majority NAM) $10,243

      How dumb/misinformed can you get? The state of education in trailer parks these days I tell ya.

  2. backfromvancouver
    February 26, 2011 at 9:40 am

    I was recently in Vancouver, BC, and while the metro area is not free of problems, it’s far better off than most areas in the U.S. The racism criticism I don’t get in this case. The city itself is 50 percent visible minority, and the metro area is 40 percent minority, mostly Chinese, South Asian and Southeast Asian. They appear to be economically integrated, and in spite some level of ethnic cliquishness up there, they aren’t confined to a physical ghetto — in fact, there are no true ghettos up there. The various visible minorities, mostly Asians, are evenly distributed throughout every city and suburb in the metro area (although Richmond is disproportionately Asian), and appear to be doing quite well for themselves economically. Multiculturalism appears to the official ideology up there, and most people seem to believe in it — and in an area that does as well as Vancouver, why not? It’s one of those few places where multiculturalism seems to work quite well, in that it seems to have made many avenues of upward mobility available to its population. They don’t have too many ethnic groups that display ghetto behavior, although I’ve read that the descendants of Sikh refugees in Surrey can be kind of thuggish. I believe Toronto has accepted more refugees, however, and has more of a problem with crime. Vancouver has organized crime, but not much in the way of petty street crime — most of its immigrants were people who moved there for work, not refugees.

    Lots of young white males walking around with Asian girlfriends up there, although not nearly as many Asian Male/White Female pairings. I haven’t been to Australia, but message boards that I’ve read indicate the white male/Asian female pairing is extremely common there, which makes sense — Aussie males not only have a population of Asian immigrants to choose from, but they’re conveniently just a short flight away from Thailand, Vietnam, the Philippines and Japan.

    One hundred years from now, I wouldn’t be surprised if much of Canada, Australia and New Zealand’s population will have a similar phenotype to the current residents of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Xinxiang — lots of mixed race Euro/South Asian/East Asian people, some who look more one than the other and many who fall somewhere in the middle.

    I also got to sample the delights of a sweet and stunningly gorgeous Russian lady while up there — and by non-traditional means, if you catch my drift. Another benefit that a place like Canada provides.

  3. Columnist
    February 26, 2011 at 10:22 am

    “Why not euthanize older Canucks- actively or passively? Why cooperate with their passive aggressive white progeny?”

    If the white progeny is smart, they side against the older whites, and euthanize them.

  4. Neran
    February 26, 2011 at 12:42 pm

    What is your racial background?

  5. raliv
    February 27, 2011 at 2:24 pm

    I would be curious of your opinion of Russia on this matter: declining birthrates among the white slavic population but a recent emergence of whites terrorizing non white tourists and immigrants.

  6. raliv
    February 27, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    Let me rephrase: Recent emergence of whites being less tolerant of non white tourists and immigrants.

    too late.

  7. g
    October 7, 2011 at 1:41 am

    Why do third world non-white morons feel the need to move to superior first world predominantly white nations and then bitch about how the country works. I live in Canada and the emergence of stupid fucking Indians that cant even speak English bothers me. These poor fucks love to complain and bitch about white people yet herd to all our first world nations like rats. If you don’t like the way the country is move back to your garbage third world country and develop it up to a first world nation, if its at all possible. If you want a free ride in our superior countries rather then fix your country of origin (these lazy fucks don’t know what hard work is) then shut up that simple. These stupid fucks try to act superior but when you have to move a white majority country, living my peoples lifestyle, and insult me in my own language its just pathetic. Whites countries are by far the most accomplished and have the best living standards. It wasn’t until these fucking lesser humans starting coming here that north American is declining.
    —-

    Nobody cares about the ravings of a DYING people who have lost their previous advantages.

    All older whites, and many younger ones, have an ‘interesting’ future ahead of them.

  8. EvilOne
    March 4, 2014 at 8:38 pm

    Moar plz.

  9. Anonymous
    January 11, 2016 at 12:30 pm

    I suspect that the lesser Anglo Saxon countries will prosper while the two giants, USA and UK will decline. Australia and NZ and even Canada will probably have a lot of immigrants from the USA and UK. Therefore, there populations will increase substantially. Furthermore, the immigrants will predominantly be relatively young and skilled.
    Even in the USA, it can be seen that areas which are at the receiving end of white flight are growing while those losing people, such as Detroit are in decline. I suspect that this trend will become more visibly inter-country based, with Australia and New Zealand being at the receiving end. They both have the advantages of being more roomy, having good weather and being located near growth areas in Asia which increases their trading potential.
    By contrast, the USA and UK will decline and the decline will be more easily visible in some areas than others.

    • P Ray
      January 12, 2016 at 4:16 pm

      You’ve missed a reality that has been stated elsewhere:
      These lesser Anglo-Saxon countries treat Asians crappily.

      I should know, I’ve lived in New Zealand. Male international students that began and completed their education there, find it very difficult to find a job commensurate with their qualifications.
      The females on the other hand … have no lack of job offers. Naturally, the society is quite misandrist. Lots of feminism, but (I repeat myself) the worst offenders are the “Westernised Asian Women”.

      • Anonymous
        February 28, 2016 at 7:42 am

        I don’t deny what you are saying. But my point is that these countries can receive substantial white immigration from Britain and the USA and grow, without Asian immigration. They do not need Asian immigration if they can have skilled immigrants from elsewhere. In short, the Anglo-Saxon countries will collectively decline, but some of these countries will grow at the expense of the others. I suspect that Australia and New Zealand will be among the winners, largely due to their small size. I suspect that many of the whites they attract will be the white flighters.
        Regarding misandry and discrimination against non-white males, this is also observable in the UK and USA, and has been commented on particularly in relation to African Americans, but no doubt exists for others as well.

      • P Ray
        February 28, 2016 at 8:23 am

        But my point is that these countries can receive substantial white immigration from Britain and the USA and grow, without Asian immigration. They do not need Asian immigration if they can have skilled immigrants from elsewhere.
        Few white people will tolerate being underpaid for a chance to be a part of a “lesser” country.
        Many of the Asians will, because they are scared their visas won’t be approved.

        The white flighters have the means to buy property, so the local kiwis and Maoris will be moaning (in anger, and maybe pleasure) … however, the pay scale in NZ is lower than the other white countries.

        Explain to me again how those whites enjoy being poor or having to downgrade their lifestyles? Australia and New Zealand have very high living costs.

      • P Ray
        February 28, 2016 at 8:27 am

        P.S. Kiwis HATE Australians, Americans and British.
        according to them,
        the Australians “steal everything Kiwis do and claim ownership over cultural icons”
        the Americans “have no respect for anyone”
        the British “are always whinging and whining”.

        Note: 25% of New Zealand’s population … live and work overseas.
        Seems they can’t stand NZ either:)

      • Anonymous
        March 12, 2016 at 2:15 pm

        When white people whinge about each other, it is just for show. White people actually prefer each other to non-whites. Even the evidence shown on this blog elsewhere indicates this to be the case. Whites don’t whinge about non-whites, they just avoid them.


        The history of Europe (including all those world wars) says otherwise. It is very easy to get whites to hate and kill each other on an industrial scale.

        Pay in Australia is higher than in Britain, though the living costs are also higher.
        I knew an Asian family that lived in New Zealand for a few years. They knew British people who had moved to New Zealand. They asked them why they had moved to NZ (as they couldn’t see why people would leave a 1st World country like Britain) and the reply was that by selling their modestly sized property in Britain, they could buy a huge property in NZ and live like millionaires.


        Australia will be owned (controlled) by China within a couple of decades. The only question is whether it will be mostly voluntarily or not.

        The reality is that both Australia and NZ are large countries with huge area of space, in comparison to Britain which is crowded and has high property prices.
        I have seen surveys undertaken in the UK that suggest that large numbers of Britons would consider moving abroad, and the preferred country is usually Australia. Furthermore, British citizens have an advantage in Australia, that after living in Australia for 3 years, they can obtain Australian citizenship without giving up British citizenship. So it is very easy for them to become dual citizens (a privilege no other nationality, not even the Irish have).
        Generally, there is a large number of people who transfer between the UK and Australia and NZ (in both directions). Some of these people settle in the other country. In general, there seems to be a net inflow from the UK to Australia.

        Nobody cares..

        It is a nice idea to think that the more overtly racist (than Britons or Americans) Aussies and Kiwis will get their comeuppance one day and wish they had treated the Asians better. But this is just a fantasy of Asian immigrants who are both desperate to belong with and hang with whites and at the same time angry at every slight they receive from those same whites. The reality is that some parts of the Western World will decline and fall and some will stay afloat. It would be nice to think that the racists will be the losers, but it probably won’t work that way. In fact, the more racist countries may do better and precisely because they were racist, they may attract white flighters from elsewhere. Even many of the non-racist whites will move to whiter areas and whiter countries when their interests dictate.

        The white west is fucked for systemic reasons. Also you are assuming that the white west has a favorable demographic profile.

        The question is how this will pan out in the US itself. Because of its size, the impact will differ between different parts of the USA with some states and cities declining fast and others staying afloat.
        I suspect that the future will not be that different from the present, only that the current trends will accelerate (and at some point the USA will have to give up being a major World power). There will be more movement of whites. Usually, in this process the better qualified and wealthier whites will do the moving and the rest will have to stay put. Whites may prefer each other but they are not particularly loyal to each other and not likely to try to save the losers (Asians, Blacks and Latinos are not loyal to each other either). So there will be many older and poorer whites stuck in the declining areas while there will be many non-whites in areas staying afloat. Even the Asians will run to the areas that are staying afloat, even while complaining of racism.
        It would be a good thing if non-whites tried to uplift areas of decline using their own initiative, but there is little sign of that happening. Perhaps the Asians, (both Southern and Eastern) could move to Detroit and unite with the black population and also invite some Latinos in and regenerate Detroit. Then even the whites may move back in and the non-whites can even have the pleasure of wagging the finger at the whites. It would be a great thing if these types of scenarios would materialise. But I see no sign of anything like this. Instead, Asians keep running after whites. Therefore, based on their own behaviour, (and not on their cyber fantasies) their fates are tied with those of the whites, and any decline that whites face will also lead to the decline of Asians (and Blacks and Latinos as well) in the West.


        That remains to be seen.

        The cake of decline will not be handed on a plate for whites only to eat while the bounties of the future are enjoyed by the non-whites. Rather, the decline will disproportionately affect non-whites who with their dependent hanger-on mentality (even the Asians, especially the Asians) will not be able to cope. At any rate, the future in the USA is not bright for lonely aging Indian software engineers who spent all their hard earned money on hookers. Therefore, instead of daydreaming revenge fantasies, try to come up with realistic strategies for surviving the future which will include a lot of decline for a lot of people of all races in the West.

        —-

        You might have noticed that most physical products made today are not made in the west. Also the west has NO technological edge over the east. Infact, the west has entered an age of progressive stagnation and a technological death spiral for about two decades now.

      • Anonymous
        March 12, 2016 at 2:59 pm

        I think that you are correct with how Westernised Asian women may discriminate against new Asian males entering the West. These women aspire, almost to the last woman among them, to socialise with and to date and marry whites and don’t want any Asian males on the scene if they can avoid them. In particular they hate it when an Asian male gets married to a white female. This seems bizarre when you consider that they are themselves not interested in an Asian male for anything. I suspect that they like to think they are leaving Asians behind by becoming white, and any Asian male who marries a white woman somehow shatters that idea for them. I think this pathology affects both East Asian and South Asian women as I have observed it in both these groups.


        The sad reality for you is that younger generations in the rest of the world no longer see or believe in white superiority. I would do further and say that most non-whites below a certain age look down on whites. That is a far bigger problem for a terminally declining bunch like you.

        But this is why it is so stupid for an Asian male to hate whites. No matter what whites do, Asians are usually worse, especially Asian females. So if an Asian male wants to get ahead in a Western country, they have no choice but to integrate with whites who are the only people who will give them a break and to marry a white woman (or bring a wife from back home) as marrying a Westernised Asian female is a non-starter.


        Tell that to someone who cares..

      • Anonymous
        March 12, 2016 at 4:50 pm

        Just to clarify, when I mentioned Asians having a dependent hanger on mentality, I was only referring to Asians living in the West and seeking to assimilate, not to those living in Asia, who I believe have a great future, independent of the West.

        Well.. many non-whites who immigrated to the west before the 1990s had that attitude. However that is no longer the case- and that change is irreversible.

      • P Ray
        March 14, 2016 at 5:28 am

        Furthermore, British citizens have an advantage in Australia, that after living in Australia for 3 years, they can obtain Australian citizenship without giving up British citizenship. So it is very easy for them to become dual citizens (a privilege no other nationality, not even the Irish have).

        A big “nope” to your “privilege no other nationality have”.
        New Zealand citizens can become dual citizens with the US.

        On the flip side, why bother? Permanent residency through birth or lineage is much better (I have that).
        It will be nice to leave with some booty(all types) once I get an expedition underway

        P.S. Asians can “live in the West” … without kowtowing. Citizens don’t have to agree with their government … only follow the laws. Also, assimilation is a 2 way street.
        I hear bride prices still exist in the West … and so does arranged marriages.

      • P Ray
        March 14, 2016 at 5:45 am

        I knew an Asian family that lived in New Zealand for a few years. They knew British people who had moved to New Zealand. They asked them why they had moved to NZ (as they couldn’t see why people would leave a 1st World country like Britain) and the reply was that by selling their modestly sized property in Britain, they could buy a huge property in NZ and live like millionaires.

        Your news is very outdated. Now, New Zealand is one of the most expensive countries in the world.
        http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11261181
        Bernard Hickey: Beautiful but costly

        5:00 AM Sunday May 25, 2014 105 comments
        NZ should not be so expensive

        Peter Bills caused outrage when he criticised NZ as ‘100% rip-off’.
        Peter Bills caused outrage when he criticised NZ as ‘100% rip-off’.
        I love welcoming people to our beautiful, friendly country, but I’m becoming increasingly uncomfortable about our prices. New Zealand is an expensive destination and it’s getting worse. We all remember the uproar when British rugby commentator Peter Bills described New Zealand as 100 per cent rip-off rather than 100 per cent Pure.

        It felt like harsh criticism at the time, but it rightly forced us to look at just how expensive we are relative to the rest of the world.

        This week the Productivity Commission published a paper by Victoria University Professor Norman Gemmell, which looked in depth at our prices relative to the rest of the OECD.

        It turns out we punch above our weight in all the wrong ways. We may be relatively poor in terms of spending per capita, but the prices we charge and are charged are much higher than our wealth suggests.

        Gemmell looked first at tradable goods and services, which are those where the price is set on international markets, which means things we export or import, or things that have to compete with those traded goods.

        He found our tradable prices were the ninth highest in the OECD, even though our spending per capita was the 22nd highest.

        Second, he looked at non-tradable prices, which includes things such as electricity, government services, real estate and construction, where there is no international competition. Our prices in 2005 were the 19th highest in the world, which was also higher than where we should have been relative to our spending power.

        Gemmell used the deepest data available that could be compared with other countries, which was for 2005. More recent data from the World Bank for 2011 shows we’re the 11th most expensive in the world, up from 22nd in 2005.

        So, if anything, the prices Bills paid for car hire, wine, restaurants and clothes when he wrote his 2011 article in the New Zealand Herald were worse than in 2005.

  10. P Ray
    January 14, 2016 at 3:02 am

    And regarding Europe, that bastion of Liberté, égalité, fraternité makes it legal for employers to snoop or ask for your Facebook passwords:
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3397433/European-court-says-bosses-read-staff-s-private-messages.html
    Bosses can now read staff’s private messages sent on WhatsApp and similar forums during work hours, European court rules
    Judges say firms have the right to check whether staff are doing their job
    Centres on case of Romanian engineer fired for chatting online with fiancee
    Ruling is binding on countries including Britain that ratified the European Convention on Human Rights
    By KATHERINE RUSHTON MEDIA AND TECHNOLOGY EDITOR FOR THE DAILY MAIL
    PUBLISHED: 13:13 GMT, 13 January 2016 | UPDATED: 01:36 GMT, 14 January 2016

    • P Ray
      April 14, 2016 at 9:48 am

      Speaking of France, the home of romance:
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3540250/Frenchwoman-sacked-refusing-change-employee.html
      Frenchwoman sacked for refusing to change her first name which was the same as another employee
      Marion, 27, dismissed just weeks after starting commercial assistant job
      She was fired over dispute with her boss concerning her first name
      Marion said: ‘He wanted me to change my name from Marion to Marie’
      This was to avoid confusing her with another Marion at the Toulouse office
      By KATE SAMUELSON FOR MAILONLINE
      PUBLISHED: 16:01 GMT, 14 April 2016 | UPDATED: 16:15 GMT, 14 April 2016

      7
      View comments
      A woman has been sacked for refusing to be called by a different name at work (stock photo)
      A woman has been sacked for refusing to be called by a different name at work (stock photo)
      A French woman called Marion has been sacked for refusing to accept being called by a different name.
      The 27-year-old was dismissed by her boss just weeks after securing the role as a trainee commercial assistant at a small firm that makes medical equipment, based in Toulouse.
      But Marion, whose surname is unknown, was abruptly fired after a dispute with her manager over her first name, according to local newspaper La Dépêche du Midi.
      ‘He wanted me to change my name from Marion to Marie, because clients could confuse me with another Marion that worked in the same department,’ -she told the newspaper.

      Maybe the French are so romantic because they don’t waste brain cells or effort to remember people’s names. After all, mental activity does require energy.

  11. Thomas
    February 15, 2016 at 12:41 am

    And in Australia they wonder why so.many immigrants end up on welfare – this article explains it perfectly. My parents were given the scum jobs to do and I know that because I have a funny last name things haven’t been as easy for me as if I was a Smith or Jones or an Andrews etc. The discrimination is subtle but there. Australia also has a massive old boys network that goes back to what school you attended. Even in my 40’s I still get asked what school I attended. I now reply – Boys Town (it’s a school for troubled and homeless kids). They look at me perplexed…

    • P Ray
      February 29, 2016 at 11:58 pm

      The “white countries” (Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom, United States) have been living off of the myth of being meritocracies to get the best and brightest people of colour to work for cheap or cover the ass of their bosses, for a very long time.
      But I suspect that gravy train is running out. And they’re not making enough of their own people who are willing to work for cheap or accept unearned blame.

      • Anonymous
        March 12, 2016 at 3:53 pm

        I think many bright immigrants have wasted their energy in the West. I know qualified Asian professionals who moved to the Anglo Saxon countries who ended up doing second rate jobs for which they were overqualified. Also, many immigrants who do enter the profession of their choice still do not reach as high a degree of success as perhaps they merited.

        I think that the greater tragedy is that so many whites, who are mentally stuck in a previous era, are still alive. But disability and death from old age will fix that problem soon.

        The reasons are complex but subtle middle class discrimination is a part of this. Middle class whites think they are being generous by merely allowing non-whites to enter and participate (which is true at one level), as opposed to those they would consider to be the “real racists” (i.e. lower class skin head or KKK types) who don’t want non-whites in their countries at all. But these middle class whites do not want total equality, especially when it affects their own promotion prospects. This exists in all Anglo Saxon countries, and is probably least strong in the USA and probably worst in Oz/NZ. (It is even worse in France).


        It does not matter anymore. I am actually enjoying the effects of the post-2000 economy on the lives and future prospects of middle-class whites and their progeny. It is fun to watch non-rich whites (the 99%) getting screwed over by the very people (1%) they used to slave and cheer for.

        Despite this, however, more Asians still seek to come, and the Anglo countries can institute significant immigration controls and still manage to get plenty of people from outside. The reason discrimination happens is because they can get away with it. Furthermore, many Asians stay in Oz/NZ because of the education system and because they believe (rightly or wrongly) that their children will have it better.

        Actually, that particular process stopped over a decade ago. Perhaps you are still living in the 1990s- which would not be surprising. The people who move to other countries nowadays do so as a decision based in business-like thinking, rather than some desperate quest for a “better” life.

        Even the Arabs are able to get millions of South Asian workers to come in and build their buildings and clean their homes, despite the terrible treatment and quite low pay they give them. So it is no surprise that the Anglo Saxons will be able to obtain Asians for some time yet.

        That is what subhuman retards like you still don’t understand. The educated professional types who could not have a materially prosperous lifestyle in their countries of birth in previous eras can do that with increasing ease now. They have therefore little incentive to take crap from inferiors like yourself. This does not mean that they will not move around the world. Infact, they are doing so in increasing numbers. It is just that they will do on terms that are in their favor.

        Therefore, I suspect that the gravy train has not yet run out, though it would be a good thing if it did.
        It is a wasteful system, because the immigrants have skills that are often needed badly back home, but they would rather go to Oz/NZ and get paid more for an inferior job. So the immigrants are themselves being greedy and putting money ahead of professional satisfaction and a desire to improve their own countries. So they can’t complain too loudly when they are treated as second class citizens.

        You can keep masturbating to that mental porn.. but the era you want to live in has been over for over a decade.

      • P Ray
        March 13, 2016 at 2:36 am

        Unfortunately for you, Anonymous …
        white people are trying to go overseas to get paid more than locals.
        Sadly, that isn’t working out too well for them, ref:
        To the “ah, just live in China, I’m a white guy, it’s really cheap”-gang:
        reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/49c7t3/revealed_the_30year_economic_betrayal_dragging/
        [–]Sasselhoff 4 points 11 hours ago
        And it’s fucked here in China too. I work at a foreign company making a foreign wage that is light years beyond the average Chinese person, and there is no way in hell that even I could afford to purchase a house here (not that I would anyway though), even in middle of nowhere coal country. The only upside is that rent here is stupidly cheap…I could quite literally rent my current place for about 50 years before I would come equal to the purchase price.
        The only way the men here are able to buy a house, and you must buy a house to be able to get married (and a car for that matter), is to have had their parents save up for their entire lives and buy one for them. Otherwise it is literally impossible for the average Chinese person to buy a house.
        The most amazing part is that there are thousands of completely empty houses (totally empty, as in concrete walls, no floors, etc) because the wealthy (well, wealthier) have been buying them for investment as it’s one of the only forms of investment they can participate in aside from the rigged stock market (not allowed to invest overseas).

      • P Ray
        March 13, 2016 at 2:37 am

        Even the Arabs are able to get millions of South Asian workers to come in and build their buildings and clean their homes, despite the terrible treatment and quite low pay they give them. So it is no surprise that the Anglo Saxons will be able to obtain Asians for some time yet.
        It’s not really a measure of anything except fraud and trickery that they can get away with it.
        The next few years should be very interesting for them as the oil money runs out.

      • hoipolloi
        March 13, 2016 at 3:43 pm

        @P Ray: “The next few years should be very interesting for them as the oil money runs out.”

        Is this a fact or some ones wet dream? I read that Saudi Arabia still has 250 billion barrels of proven reserves of oil. Arabs are going to be rich for a long time in the future even if the oil runs out in the next twenty years which it is not. 250×4 = Trillion dollars. They can afford to hire Americans soon as domestic help; the way U.S. economy is loosing jobs to outsourcing.

        PS: This is scary. Like to hear alternate scenarios. Thanks.

      • P Ray
        March 13, 2016 at 5:54 pm

        Is this a fact or some ones wet dream? I read that Saudi Arabia still has 250 billion barrels of proven reserves of oil. Arabs are going to be rich for a long time in the future even if the oil runs out in the next twenty years which it is not. 250×4 = Trillion dollars. They can afford to hire Americans soon as domestic help; the way U.S. economy is loosing jobs to outsourcing.

        You forgot the PRICE of the oil. There’s no point in having lots of a resource, if the sale price exceeds the infrastructure and extraction cost. The oil & gas & mining downturn is, for example, hitting Australia VERY hard right now.

      • P Ray
        March 13, 2016 at 5:56 pm

        @Anonymous
        Middle class whites think they are being generous by merely allowing non-whites to enter and participate (which is true at one level), as opposed to those they would consider to be the “real racists” (i.e. lower class skin head or KKK types) who don’t want non-whites in their countries at all.

        The quickest way to find out if a person is racist is to ask this question:
        “Would you allow your daughter to marry me?” If you hear any spluttering or hem- and haw-ing … you’ve met a closet racist.
        (Women are not subject to the same discrimination, they have a pussy which is welcome everywhere)

      • P Ray
        March 13, 2016 at 5:57 pm

        Whoops, must correct my statement:
        You forgot the PRICE of the oil. There’s no point in having lots of a resource, if the sale price is below the infrastructure and extraction cost. The oil & gas & mining downturn is, for example, hitting Australia VERY hard right now.

      • P Ray
        April 22, 2016 at 12:01 am

        @hoipolloi: remember, I said the oil money would run out …
        http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3549262/Saudi-Arabia-close-securing-10-billion-bank-loan-sources.html
        Saudi Arabia forced to BORROW $10billion as tumbling oil prices continue to hit the kingdom’s finances
        Kingdom close to securing loan from ‘mix of U.S., EU and Japanese banks’
        Lead arrangers included JP Morgan, HSBC and Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi
        World’s top oil exporter hit by a record deficit caused by low crude prices
        See the latest news on Saudi Arabia as oil prices continue to tumble
        By SIMON TOMLINSON FOR MAILONLINE
        PUBLISHED: 07:41 GMT, 20 April 2016 | UPDATED: 09:28 GMT, 20 April 2016

      • P Ray
        May 19, 2016 at 11:56 pm

        More fun from Saudi:
        http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3598770/Cash-strapped-Saudi-Arabia-considers-paying-contractors-IOUs-nation-continues-hit-fall-oil-prices.html

        Saudi Arabia is short of cash as oil price has fallen from $70 to $47 a barrel
        Riyadh has a massive budget deficit and is looking at ways to save money
        It is considering paying contractors with a form of ‘I owe you’ notes
        By CHRIS SUMMERS FOR MAILONLINE
        PUBLISHED: 12:23 GMT, 19 May 2016 | UPDATED: 12:44 GMT, 19 May 2016

        What I predict is going to happen is a coup, and then a repudiation of debt … or a promise to pay that is never realised or reaches a deadline.

  12. Anonymous
    March 14, 2016 at 12:45 pm

    One thing I respect about whites is their pragmatism. Even when the situation gets bad, they will try to find a way of working things out or they will move on. Indians on the other hand will sit around in the same place bitterly plotting revenge and growing old.
    Once, when Ratan Tata decided to give compulsory retirement to all the staff over the age of 57 at his firm, many of them protested and kept coming into the office and trying to hang on to the job that they had been fired from. One even kept turning up for decades after he had been fired, into his 90s. No white man would be so stupid.
    Sitting around bitterly waiting or this or that macro trend to reek vengeance on those you hate is a poor life strategy. Only an Indian would be so stupid as to embark on it.
    At any rate, too much bitterness and resentment can make one’s face ugly over the years. This will only further reduce one’s chances with women of any race. Eventually, one reaches a point of no return, probably sometime before 50. After that, one becomes an invisible ethnic minority ghost whom no one notices.

    • hoipolloi
      March 14, 2016 at 4:47 pm

      It is easy for whites to be pragmatic when they have all the opportunities and chances of success. It does not show any strength of character. Think white privilege.

      With Indians/south Asians it is not the case. After a long ordeal they end up in some dead end job with little mobility; both in India or the U.S. So they tend to be reactionary. You are correct probably that they become hateful and revenge types.

      Your anectode about Tata’s employees returning to work for years even after terminated is interesting. Some Indians can be that foolish.

    • P Ray
      March 14, 2016 at 6:18 pm

      One thing I respect about whites is their pragmatism. Even when the situation gets bad, they will try to find a way of working things out or they will move on. Indians on the other hand will sit around in the same place bitterly plotting revenge and growing old.

      Have you heard about the Hatfields and the McCoys?

      With Indians/south Asians it is not the case. After a long ordeal they end up in some dead end job with little mobility; both in India or the U.S. So they tend to be reactionary. You are correct probably that they become hateful and revenge types.

      I am figuring the 30 year betrayal towards Generations X and Y by the baby boomers … is not restricted by ethnicity. I am also reminded of eloquent writers like Joseph Stack
      http://wtfsgoingon.typepad.com/what-the-fucks-going-on-blog/2010/02/disturbed-american-pilot-strikes-a-blow-for-the-average-joe-rage-against-the-machine.html
      “Well Mr. Big Brother, Mr. Taxman, let’s try something different:
      take my pound of flesh and sleep well.”

      The jobs, worldwide – a huge number are gone and are not coming back. Perhaps only a war can save all of the people who live through it.
      That will also mean booty … of all types.

  13. P Ray
    March 14, 2016 at 9:03 pm

    P.S. Just wanted to add this snippet of information here:
    – For a 30-year house loan for a property valued at 1,000,000 … the monthly payments are 5,600.
    – That means that unless you buy the property in cash – the ACTUAL cost is 5,600 x 12 x 30 = 2,016,000.

    Enjoy telling me about how “white people everywhere will come out on top”, as … the median per-capita income in the USA is $ 26,363/ year (~$2,200 per month), can most people save a worthwhile amount of money?

    Methinks a huge amount of people are actually … being given charity by not being foreclosed on, specifically due to their race … as the gubmint doesn’t want anarchy. And it’s not the minorities getting this treatment:)

    • P Ray
      March 14, 2016 at 9:14 pm

      P.S. That monthy payment figure of 5,600, is on the low side.
      At any rate, too much bitterness and resentment can make one’s face ugly over the years. This will only further reduce one’s chances with women of any race. Eventually, one reaches a point of no return, probably sometime before 50. After that, one becomes an invisible ethnic minority ghost whom no one notices.
      Rebuttal: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2022102/Why-struggle-single-women-45-meet-soulmate.html
      “The Plankton Generation – that’s women who are barely visible
      and at the bottom of the food chain for romance – just because they’re over 45”

      Perhaps they are looking for Chad Thundercock … not realising that person, for ANY ethnicity … can get girls NOT women.

      • P Ray
        March 14, 2016 at 9:46 pm

        So what do the older men think of the dynamic women who defy aging (i.e. old biddies)?
        http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3355416/JAN-MOIR-ladies-cruel-old-boys-looking-love.html
        ‘What about men in their twilight years?’ wrote 82-year-old Neil Chambers from Hertfordshire? Since divorcing 34 years ago and trying his luck online, Mr Chambers says he has yet to meet ‘a lady with whom I had any spark or romantic feeling’ — apart, that is, from the ‘charming, intelligent wives of my male friends’.
        It’s not that he hasn’t tried.
        ‘Some of the dinner dates or coffee evenings were an embarrassing waste of money and time. I just couldn’t wait to get shot of stupid, unhappy, often mentally deficient women who were not ever attractive or well-dressed, real NO HOPERS,’ he fumed.
        Clive Greenman emailed to say that he is a ‘dark-haired, fun chap, director of a couple of companies’ and that he also has ‘my own house, teeth and hair’.
        Lonely: Esther Rantzen has been single since her husband Desmond Wilcox (above) died in 2000
        Lonely: Esther Rantzen has been single since her husband Desmond Wilcox (above) died in 2000
        Clive is an enthusiastic online dater and sounds like a catch, but can he find a woman online to share his life? No, he cannot.
        Five minutes after arriving, one recent date told him she used to take a lot of cocaine and was currently banned from driving — now let’s go home to meet mum! Er no, let’s not.
        Another date turned out to be a Ugandan scammer, and last month, when he took a lady out to dinner in Banbury, he was taken aback when she ‘nicked a bottle of wine from the restaurant’.
        Yet Clive still lives in hope. ‘I did a four-hour round trip to meet a headmistress for a drink. We had a great chat and lovely chemistry, then she told me she was actually married but happy to have a twice-weekly romp.’
        Clive, who is looking for a ‘long-term, loving relationship’ was appalled.
        ‘Can I meet a nice NORMAL lady? No!’ he writes.
        The most common complaint from the chaps was that female dates expected them to pay for everything.
        The second most popular gripe was women getting drunk. And last in this unholy trinity was the women’s lack of effort when travelling to meet.
        ‘It is always the man who has to get into a car or on to a train,’ says Bruce B, from Newcastle.
        ‘Men get blamed for everything,’ writes a Mr Brian Fleming, who is ‘approaching 71’ and whose vast experience of online dating has left him somewhat disillusioned.
        ‘If you don’t have a pile of money, then women move quickly on to the next chap,’ he complains.

        Ooof!
        No wonder!
        His main beef is with what he calls the ‘dinner ladies’ — so named because they are always trying to winkle a free feed out of their dates. He’s developed his own strategy to deal with them.
        ‘Even when you meet for coffee, they try to wangle a free dinner. So I say to them, sorry, we agreed coffee — and anyway, I am having dinner with my family later.
        ‘Then I just watch the dinner ladies’ faces turn into a gurning exhibition.’
        Oh girls, is this true?
        I also received reports of men being invited in for coffee only to find themselves ‘being wrestled on to the sofa of a dingy flat by a lunatic’ or surprised when a date ‘turned up already drunk and proceeded to get drunker’ or ‘just sat there and talked about herself and her ex-husband all night’.
        Another correspondent despairs because on more than one occasion women have ‘proposed to me within the week’. There were several along the lines of ‘she sent me a photograph of her gorgeous blonde self — but when I met her, I realised it had been taken 30 years and three stones ago’.

  14. Anonymous
    March 16, 2016 at 11:47 am

    At any rate, there is no point in being bitter and angry at white people because it makes them feel smug. Instead, it is better to live a better life than them and out do them where possible.
    Many Anglos feel worry and envy when they see non-white countries like India and China moving ahead. And most middle class Anglos are envious of wealthy non-whites, be they in the Third World or First World. But they are quite happy to see non-whites as non-threatening losers and failures.
    The same goes for dealing with women. It is better to have a good life than to show bitterness towards them. Also, where women are concerned, they are not bothered about MGTOW men because they believe that MGTOW men are failures that they wouldn’t be interested in anyway. Also, they can’t distinguish between a MGTOW man and any other man who is single. Aging women only get upset when they see men getting together with other women, especially if the women are younger than them. Then the aging women feel insecure. This is especially true if you end up having children and they are childless.

    • P Ray
      March 17, 2016 at 6:45 pm

      The same goes for dealing with women. It is better to have a good life than to show bitterness towards them. Also, where women are concerned, they are not bothered about MGTOW men because they believe that MGTOW men are failures that they wouldn’t be interested in anyway. Also, they can’t distinguish between a MGTOW man and any other man who is single. Aging women only get upset when they see men getting together with other women, especially if the women are younger than them. Then the aging women feel insecure. This is especially true if you end up having children and they are childless.

      I’ll let someone else rebut this. Women hate men having fun without them – PERIOD.
      “Originally Posted by The Purifier View Post
      If women don’t see you as “Mr. Right”, what is the point in pursuing them? It will only cause you misery and humiliation. If women aren’t attracted to you, they will only view you as a waste of space, a threat. An enemy.

      If women view you as their enemy, then you in turn must view them the same way.
      When women view you as an enemy, the whole society (with all the beta-white knights and avg men) view you as an enemy.

      Society is ALWAYS on women’s side, so our enemy is the fucked up society.”

      • P Ray
        April 19, 2016 at 9:55 pm

        And another post in the same vein:
        Why would a woman wear sexy clothes to get attention from strangers when she’s in a relationship?

        Because there is literally no difference in a woman’s mind between being in a relationship and being single. Whether she has a man waiting for her at home or not, she still wants all eyes on her when she’s out and about doing her daily routine. They are narcissists and love the validation. A woman isn’t going to let something like a “relationship” get in the way of her biological, primitive need to be on a sexual pedestal. Women get off on the fact that they are out of your league and don’t consider you human. Although they’d prefer to be persued by a Chad Thundercock, a close second sadistic joy is her feeling oppressed by being desired by a sub8. They want to feel like distressed damsels. They love the victimhood of being desired by and getting attention from a sub8, yet despise the sub8 himself.

        The greatest joy a woman can have — besides barebacking a Chad — is knowing that she is effectively castrating an incel by denying him sex. She hopes he can’t find it elsewhere with another woman. That’s why women are against prostitution. They don’t want incels to have options: a woman wants her rejection to be significantly devastating to an incel.

  1. February 27, 2011 at 12:27 pm
  2. April 17, 2012 at 5:00 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 125 other followers

%d bloggers like this: