Archive

Archive for April, 2011

The Reality of Higher Education: April 17, 2011

April 17, 2011 2 comments

I will make my point through YouTube Clips. The first clip in this series tells you the reality about law school.

Comments?

Ever Considered? : April 16, 2011

April 16, 2011 7 comments

Many of you have seen the movie version of ‘The Watchmen‘. In that movie, one of the main characters is a trans-human entity known as Dr. Manhattan.

In my opinion, the comic book (and movie) depiction of what an entity with trans-human abilities would do is inaccurate. Why would any intelligent life-form with the abilities of Dr. Manhattan interact with humans, let alone help them. While Osterman was human, Dr. Manhattan is clearly not human- and does not requite the cooperation or help of other humans to exist.

Any entity with that type of ability and a basic understanding of human nature is more likely to kill all humans or life on earth to RESET the clock. It would to far more easy to guide evolution towards a better product than change human nature.

Comments?

An Observation: April 16, 2011

April 16, 2011 8 comments

One of my most profound insights into human behavior came almost a decade ago- in my mid 20s.

People are much nicer if you are a homicide-capable asshole rather than a humane and accommodating person.

While I won’t go into details of the string of incidents which led me to this conclusion- the effects were just too stark to ignore. Anger, hate and a slew of so-called ‘negative’ emotions can get you everything ‘positive’ emotions cannot. It works especially well if your ‘negative’ emotions are visible without being overt.

Comments?

Why Technological Intelligence Will Supplant Humans

April 16, 2011 2 comments

Many technophobes, and people, believe that technology will supplant humans because it will be more capable or powerful than humans. I believe that there is another, more likely but, less obvious reason for such a transition.

Technology is far more dependable and less subjective than humans- therefore we might actually choose it over people.

Let me explain..

Humans associate with other humans to satisfy needs and desires. If what was once done by a unreliable, moody and marginally competent human can be done far more reliably, better and with less bullshit by a machine- would you still prefer a human?

Here are a few examples-

You want to see a hot naked girl with a particular set of looks and attributes. Is it more efficient to search for high-res photos/ movies of her OR find one like that and get her to strip? If your eyes cannot tell the difference between what is real and what is virtual- does it still matter?

Most of us eat foods that were either made by a machine in a factory or one at home. In previous eras, these products (ice-cream, bread, pasta, frozen chicken breasts, pre-cut steaks) were made by hand. But do we care?

If you want to find information on any subject- would you use the internet or talk to someone who might know? Who is likely to be more timely, objective and accurate- man or machine?

In summary: if humans could get the same product or service from a machine, we would always prefer interacting with it over other humans.

Comments?

Could You Broadcast This Commercial Today: April 15, 2011

April 15, 2011 Leave a comment

This is a commercial for Girls Underoos from the 1980s. Oh ya, those copyright cocksuckers want you to watch it on YouTube.

Here is my question-

Could you make and broadcast this commercial today without some “concerned groups” for the “protection of children” shutting you down?

Comments?

Discuss: Are Schools, In Their Current Form, Necessary?

April 15, 2011 6 comments

I have, in a previous post, wondered about the utility of schools and universities in our age. While both institutions had some residual utility in the pre-internet era, we have moved on.

Every kid has his/her optimal style of learning and a ‘one size fits all’ approach is neither desirable or necessary. So why spend money and time on baby sitting plus indoctrination?

Do schools educate children?

Let me clarify- I can see a role for some form of pre-school and primary school (basic literacy etc). It is however clear to me that schools, in their current form, are incapable of educating children. This issue also merges with my concern about the utility of current examination formats as a measure of learning.

Ask yourself- Would you believe any teacher over Wikipedia and Google? Would kids? Have we not already reached the point where online information is superior in objectivity, multiple viewpoints and access to some woman indoctrinating kids in a concrete room?

In any case, the ” forced socialization” occurring in schools does facilitate learning or education, does it?

Comments?

NSFW Links: Apr 14, 2011

April 14, 2011 1 comment

These links are NSFW.

Bald Cuties: Apr 13, 2011 NekkidCuties

Bald Cuties: Apr 13, 2011 Nudie Cuties

Smooth Slits: Apr 14, 2011 NekkidCuties

Smooth Slits: Apr 14, 2011 Nudie Cuties

Tumblr: nekkidcuties.tumblr.com/archive/2011/4

Enjoy!

Categories: Uncategorized

Choice Between Being A Mean Asshole or Supplicating Guy

April 14, 2011 12 comments

Many practitioners of ‘game’ talk about why being a charming asshole-type attracts women. They also warn about overplaying it and becoming a mean and vindictive asshole-type. I disagree because if your choice is between becoming a mean and vindictive asshole or your average supplicating guy- the first choice is always better than the second.

Here is why-

1. Short of picking fights, or insulting people, for no apparent reason- there is little to NO liability in being a mean and vindictive asshole. The same cannot be said of being a supplicating guy, which will guarantee exploitation and abuse by women.

2. Even a mean and vindictive asshole will provoke more emotion in women than some milquetoast ‘yes dear’ guy. Better to be visible and hated than being invisible and ignored. It seems that moderate levels of drama gets women wetter than expensive dinners.

3. Ever noticed that disagreeable guys, even those with significant criminal histories, get laid more easily than a 100K/year engineer? Why play a role that is not rewarded by society? Do you think that the engineer is working at his 100k/year job for enlightenment or benefiting humanity?

4. My own experiences strongly suggest that being mean and vindictive gets your more pussy (flings + escort freebies) than giving a shit about others. Anger, hate, contempt, abrasiveness, lewdness, aggressiveness drop far more panties than being considerate and humane.

In conclusion- don’t worry about overdoing the asshole part. Most of you won’t even come to reaching the levels at which it has a negative impact on your life. Just remember to choose your fights wisely.

Comments?

Discuss: Why Do Indians, Or Anybody Else, Have Cultural Pride?

April 13, 2011 8 comments

Growing up, one question always bothered me-

Why do Indians exhibit any pride in their culture?

What is there to be proud about? It kills and maims its believers through vegetarianism, apathy, pettiness, inferiority complexes and generally encourages its own to treat each other with less decency than exhibited towards animals.

But here is the twist in this post..

Virtually all cultures have similar characteristics in that they take pride in and justify incompetence, stupidity, greed, taboos, lack of basic human decency and a host of other objectively undesirable behaviors/ attitudes.

Ancient Greek cultures justified all manner of barbarity and stupidity under the veneer of ‘civilization’. Ancient Chinese culture justified totalitarianism, legalism and had a rather dismal attitude towards the value of human life. Ancient Roman culture was about slavery, genocide, murder, rape, lying etc.

Medieval and modern cultures are no different. While I can write detailed accounts of the venality, stupidity and damage caused by each culture- I will cut to the point.

Every single instance of culture in human history has been marked by a lowering or elimination of standards in all areas of civil society.

Culture is the antithesis of progress, humanity, innovation and everything positive about human beings. Any improvement in the human condition therefore necessitates the destruction of all versions of culture and its ardent followers.

Let me illustrate this point with a contemporary example- American Culture.

We are concerned about swear words and public nudity, but encourage depictions of people being killed or maimed. We talk about law and order, when it is obvious that both those systems are broken and corrupted beyond repair. We talk about justice and fairness while simultaneously imprisoning more people than any other nation on earth, both by numbers and percentage. We all repeat ‘Horatio Alger‘ type stories, while trying to make the system as unfair as possible.

We talk about honor, duty and commitment only to turn around and screw the suckers who believed in it. We support one of the two parties- both of whom work for the same group against us. We have supposedly objective and knowledgeable experts who are neither. Once again, I can go on- but you get my point.

Belief in culture, rather than the type you believe in, is the problem.

So stop seeing any culture as beneficial or worth striving for, because it is almost certain that you won’t benefit from it. Do things because they are rational, make you happy or are in your best interests.

Comments?

FYI: Apr 13, 2011

April 13, 2011 Leave a comment

I am getting thousands of hits (over 10,000 today) for a post about Stephanie Seymour and her son.

Interesting Dilemma: Stephanie Seymour and her Son

Any ideas about reasons behind this sudden burst of interest in an aging supermodel? Maybe it has something to do with this- WordPress.com Suffers Another Security Breach?

Comments?

Categories: Uncategorized

Video Games and High Quality Porn Will Displace Sports As Male Entertainment

April 13, 2011 11 comments

Many of you have seen pathetic displays of devotion to sports related entertainment by men. Most of you also believe that such devotion will not go away anytime soon.

I have news for you..

It will be displaced within a decade by video games and HQ porn.

Here are the reasons-

1. Sports as spectator entertainment does not compare to high quality and ubiquitous video games and porn. Even as recently as 8 years ago, video games and porn were not high-quality or ubiquitous.

My use of WinCE handhelds full of porn and reasonably good quality games in the early 2000s was not the norm. Nor was my use of smartphones for non-business related stuff in the same time span common. However today an entire generation of men have either grown up it or have access it to a level inconceivable to them even 5 years ago.

While the older generation might not readily abandon their old habits of watching sports, the younger generation had other options when growing up.

2. Organised sports has become very commercialized and expensive. However the growing economy (1950s-early 200s) that supported such growth is disappearing as we speak.

The cost of entry into viewing sporting events in person or on pay-per-view is now higher than a new title on the Xbox360 or PS3. Once you factor in console cost, ease of use, cost of HDTVs and new games plus multiplayer modes- they are less expensive than watching spectator sports on a seasonal basis.

Porn is now ubiquitous, free and easy to access. Any 500$ laptop, iPad or iPhone- with or without an inexpensive large monitor will suffice. Most of the developed world now has high-speed internet access, and even authoritarian regimes spend more time tracking and blocking political dissent than porn.

3. Even today- Video games and porn have a level of customization and interactivity which spectator sports cannot match. You have glimpsed the future with Wii, Kinect and its hacks. Feedback of tactile sensations will close the loop further allowing everybody to be an MVP and pornstar of their choice and customization.

Would you rather prefer interacting with virtual but hyper-realistic adversaries (machine generated or real) or cheer on some over paid guy scoring another touchdown, home run or hoop? Would you rather spend time looking at pictures, videos or interactive avatars of hot nekkid chicks or compare notes on the statistics of various MVPs?

4. People prefer online interactions over real life interactions and thereby choose their own peer groups- rather than accept the constraints of geography and fate. Since a considerable amount of human stupidity comes down to peer pressure, the ability to select your own peer groups would result in a diminution of activities aimed to maintaining traditional peer groups.

Watching sports is one peer activity which will be adversely affected when people can form and maintain connections with like-mined but geographically distant people, and therefore ignore people who are not like-minded but geographically nearby. Did I mention that most real-life friendships are useless.

Comments?

NSFW Links: Apr 12, 2011

April 12, 2011 Leave a comment
Categories: Uncategorized

Do You See the Problem: Apr 11, 2011

April 11, 2011 7 comments

Why consumption is more important than production in our age..

Comments?

NSFW Links: Apr 10, 2011

April 10, 2011 Leave a comment

These links are NSFW.

Finally a blue-eyed, thin blonde.. included for satisfying diversity requirements 😉

Penina from FemJoy: Introduction NekkidCuties

Penina from FemJoy: Introduction Nudie Cuties

Sarah A from MetArt: Silenzia NekkidCuties

Sarah A from MetArt: Silenzia Nudie Cuties

Sandra from MPL Studios: Playday NekkidCuties

Sandra from MPL Studios: Playday Nudie Cuties

Enjoy!

Categories: Uncategorized

Discuss: Why Do Even Mediocre Whites Have An “Attitude”?

April 10, 2011 12 comments

Have you noticed something odd about people in western countries, especially whites?

Even those with mediocre (and lower) incomes, jobs, intelligence and lives act as if they are special and important.

I support a very high level of basic dignity for any human being, but such behavior is odd and bizzare. In most countries, even those of fairly high social status are often less full of themselves and more friendly than average morons in the west.

I find this inability or unwillingness to connect to other human beings odd, especially since a significant number of people in western countries are neither poor or needy- nor are violent crime rates high. Many other traditional reasons to be cautious of strangers or casual acquaintances are also not relevant in the west.

While everyone requires their personal space, average mediocre white morons require a bit too much of it to be explained by reason.

My candidate for the reason behind this odd behavior is- ego.

Only a fragile ego, and self-doubt, could make people so self-centered and unreceptive to unexpected interactions. It is as if they don’t want hear that they are only human.. or they see ALL human interactions in a commercial light.

PS: It is not an effect of living in big cities as people in non-western big cities do acknowledge the existence of other frequently seen humans.

Comments?