Women Can No Longer Burn, Ban or Destroy Porn

Paid sex and pornography have always been major obstacles to the feminine agenda of getting men to slave away for them in return for mediocre and rationed sex. Unfortunately for them, technology is changing ground realities in both areas rather quickly.

In the pre-antibiotic, pre-testing era using the services of a prostitute was often a dangerous gamble. Thankfully antibiotics, antiviral drugs, STD-testing combined with better condoms, pills and the advent of the internet (escort ads/ bulletin boards etc) have made that route much safer and quite acceptable in many countries.

However the biggest changes to the sexual marketplace, as far as most people are concerned, is ubiquitous and high-quality porn. There was once an era when most porn was sold as print, film, video-tape and DVDs. You had to actually find and pay for semi-decent porn.

The physical nature of porn also meant that it could be burned, banned and destroyed with ease- often by fat and aging married women.

Today anybody with decent internet connectivity and a laptop, smartphone or tablet can access porn- whenever they choose, wherever they choose and with an ease which would baffle people from a couple of decades ago. I first realized the nature of this change, in the very early 2000s, after I bought my first decent laptops and PDAs. It quickly became obvious to me that technology had fundamentally changed the way I accessed and used porn.

Prior to that, porn was either linked to large non-portable devices (desktop computers, VCRs) or low-content density print media (magazines). Having thousands of photos and hundreds of movies on my laptop and a smaller collection on my PDA allowed me to access it on demand and in a variety of situations, which were previously unthinkable. It was now possible to watch a QSVGA size movie of a girl giving an awesome blowjob or taking a good spanking on a cross-country flight. I could sit in a coffee shop and thumb through a database with thousands of nudie pics. Looking through multimedia containing scores of naked chicks on the way to meet escorts or while waiting for them became second nature.

While I was an early adopter of many such technologies, today even an average person of average means can get a decent laptop (400-600$), tablet (500-700$) or smartphone (200-600$) and enjoy the fruits of that revolution. Mobile internet access (WiFi and 3G) is now almost universal and fairly inexpensive in developed countries.

Given that we use these devices and intertubes for many other purposes, the cost of high quality porn is now essentially zero. Attention-whores with cheap digital cameras are doing their best to increase the diversity of the subject pool.

For a long time women, especially wives and girlfriends, could control their men’s access to porn because it was costly, low density and physical in nature. Today they have lost that power because porn is free, high density, non-physical, ambient and easy to access. As I have said before, good porn can replace boring and mediocre relationship sex.

The true extent of this change will not be publicly obvious for a few more years, however the trends are clear.

No woman in the relationship sex mode can compete with the hundreds and thousands of attention-whores who will always look better, younger and be less bitchier than a ‘real’ woman.

What to you think? Comments?

  1. c-money91
    June 20, 2011 at 8:44 pm

    sweet 🙂

  2. June 21, 2011 at 12:26 am

    well, Mr. Crapacoli, how come drugs are illegal?

    Is it the feminists and xtians???

  3. Julianus Apostatus
    June 21, 2011 at 12:35 am

    Oh, nothing beats porn in glorious 1080P.

  4. Ted
    June 21, 2011 at 6:03 am

    What is amusing is that if a woman checks the history or cookie folder on the computer, she then feels justified in confronting her partner. The fact that she was snooping around does not seem to bother her. Of course, if he was snooping in her closet to find out what sort of over-priced, soon to be out of style clothing she bought, that is a no-no. Despite the fact that the porn is free, while the clothes are not.

    And, contrary to conventional wisdom, most men know that porn sex is not real sex. Just as watching the Food Channel does not make you an expert chef, being glued to ESPN does not make you a star athlete – most men know that watching porn will not make one a porn-caliber performer. What it does do is let men know what is available, and wonder why he cannot even get a fraction of the kinkiness he sees online.

    Even when I run errands at the grocery store or dry cleaners, I do a quick glance at the crowd and wonder to myself, “When did people become so plain (at best) or downright gruesome (at worst)?” It seems the only place to good-looking people is on TV or online. I’m not looking for models, just someone who takes good care of their appearance. You’d be surprised how much more pleasant the day can go when you see good-looking people while the day goes by.

    • June 21, 2011 at 7:29 am

      “And, contrary to conventional wisdom, most men know that porn sex is not real sex.”
      True and wrong. The only difference between mono-sex (masturbation) and duo-sex (sex with a woman) is the presence of the woman which adds an additional dimension. Otherwise, mono-sex and duo-sex produce the same biological effect in any man: dopamine, then prolactine. Now, since the same effect is produced, the average guy will find porn satisfying. This means that he will stay in this cycle of porn and will hardly get out of it.

    • shreya
      October 31, 2011 at 12:12 pm

      “And, contrary to conventional wisdom, most men know that porn sex is not real sex. Just as watching the Food Channel does not make you an expert chef, being glued to ESPN does not make you a star athlete – most men know that watching porn will not make one a porn-caliber performer.”

      You meant to say, “most men know that watching porn will not make their dick a decent size”.

      There, fixed it for ya.

    • November 6, 2014 at 3:29 pm

      Ted says… Of course, if he was snooping in her closet to find out what sort of over-priced, soon to be out of style clothing she bought, that is a no-no. Despite the fact that the porn is free, while the clothes are not.

      …or if he was snooping through her medicine cabinet to see what diseases or health dysfunctions she has. Or sex toys.

  5. Rollo Tomassi
    June 21, 2011 at 6:13 am

    AD, you’ve made this observation in at least 2 other threads, and I still concur with you. However, maybe the question you need to explore is how do you think the new universal access to porn (across all media) will affect women’s behaviors or rationales about it? They can’t destroy it, if anything they more actively participate in it (self-shots). That may be the feminine response to ever-present, ambient, sexual competition anxiety – if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em? There’s still a definite push to shame men for their sexuality and particularly porn, but I can see a more forced-acceptance of it in future generations of women.

    I can remember being a teenager, and having a well hidden porn caché of Penthouse and Hustler (both soft core) was an accomplishment. Hardcore porn was the holy grail. Now I can open a new window and see ANY porn imaginable. There is already a generation that is used to this ease of access, for whom porn has never been a commodity in the way you or I knew it.

    • June 21, 2011 at 7:24 am

      Rollo,
      “They can’t destroy it, if anything they more actively participate in it (self-shots).”
      You just answered the question.
      Males don’t need females anymore because they have easily accessible porn. Females don’t need males anymore for validation purpose, they just can pose their nude pictures online and males will have lone sex to the pictures, which is like them having sex with the females. End result is that you have more and more lone sex and less and less couple sex.

  6. fubar
    June 21, 2011 at 9:58 am

    Why do you hate women so much?

    • Deus
      June 22, 2011 at 3:09 pm

      Yeah AD!! Why do you hate women?

      Because we all know talking about women in any negative way means you automatically hate half the world’s population indiscriminately?

      • fubar
        June 22, 2011 at 10:57 pm

        That’s not what I’ve said. Some of the things he says are true. However all of it, and the over all tone with which he says it, screams that he has issues with women. Maybe mommy didn’t hug him enough, or a high school girl girlfriend broke his heart. I don’t know.

        Also a lot of the people commenting on here have pretty messed up attitudes.

        You want to complain that women are frigid or trying to dole out sex or whatever, and in the same breath you complain about girls posting sexy pictures online being “attention whores” and “unmarriageable”.. while you’re looking at these pictures fapping.

        Doesn’t make any sense.

    • Susan
      June 23, 2011 at 12:58 pm

      I am a woman and I find most of what is here regarding women in general accurate and presented in an amusing way. The author is fairly articulate but his emotionalism/lack of detachment and his vehemence/use of disparaging labels, while cute, does seem to betray his feelings about women. It could be he has a problem with his mother. Even if that is the case, it doesn’t make his valid observations any less valid.

      • shreya
        October 31, 2011 at 8:34 pm

        The author is Indian. If you know anything about Indian culture, yeah, there’s a HUGE mother son dynamic in that culture.

      • Ted
        November 1, 2011 at 5:36 am

        Shreya,

        Considering that America’s unoffical slogan is “God, Mom, and apple pie”, having mommy issues is not unique to Indians. Hell, this was a country that hanged men if they looked at their women the wrong way. Even kids (Emmett Till)

      • shreya
        November 1, 2011 at 5:46 pm

        Ted, you have no idea. Indian men are expected to live with their parents their entire life, bringing their bride (chosen by mommy) home to live under the thumb of his parents. The Indian mother rules the roost and rules her son. She even tries to control her son’s sex life.

        American moms can’t wait for their kids to grow up and get out on their own. American women have a life beyond their kids. Indian women don’t. They live for their sons and expect their sons to live for, and with them, forever.

  7. June 21, 2011 at 8:05 pm

    sooo, let’s frame this discussion a lil’ differently….

    you do know that there is a difference between playing Street Fighter and being in a street fight….

    so, uh, have you actually been, ahem in a fight, with, ya know, another living, breathing person????

    Yes, about 400-odd different women (mostly escorts).

    • fubar
      June 22, 2011 at 10:57 pm

      Why don’t you use the reply feature to reply to comments? No one is going to know you replied to them if you edit their post. And what if they use bold in their post? Then it is ambiguous.

    • MaMu1977
      June 25, 2011 at 9:08 pm

      As someone who’s played in SFII tournaments (from Championship edition to SFII:Champion edition) and who had the untrammeled joy of having lived in Brooklyn during the 80’s-90’s, the differences between a physical fight and a digital fight are superfluous once you learn how tosize up your opponent and how to take a punch. Timing is far more essential to winning a fight than speed or strength: its the reason why you can hit Chinatown in NYC and find a few underground crawling spots in the current day (and no, I’m not telling.)

    • June 25, 2011 at 10:17 pm

      I liked you better when your name was Pulsotic…

  8. Deus
    June 22, 2011 at 3:05 pm

    “Paid sex and pornography have always been major obstacles to the feminine agenda of getting men to slave away for them in return for mediocre and rationed sex.”

    You think this is good, just wait until we develop artificial uteri capable of developing an embryo. A Japanese scientist already has one that can accept a three week old embryo. When this technology becomes widespread, women will lose their biggest trump card, one they have held since the beginning of time.

    • shreya
      October 31, 2011 at 12:16 pm

      “You think this is good, just wait until we develop artificial uteri capable of developing an embryo. A Japanese scientist already has one that can accept a three week old embryo. When this technology becomes widespread, women will lose their biggest trump card, one they have held since the beginning of time.”

      It will go nowhere because most men do not want to become single fathers. The only takers will be gay couples.

      • November 1, 2011 at 12:22 am

        shreya,

        did you come here from manboobz????

  9. Susan
    June 23, 2011 at 12:48 pm

    We live in a world where men and women no longer “need” each other for anything. That is good because then any kind of interaction is because it is wanted and everyone has his/her eyes open.

    • Xergh
      July 26, 2011 at 7:03 am

      “Need” is subjective. At 39, porn let’s me deal with my wife’s lower libido but it does not replace my need for physical contact sex. For me, porn heightens my awareness to that need since the masterbation becomes less satisfying.

      All of this talk is about sexual interplay. But it leaves out the voids of family growth & shared experiences, via marriages. We all have needs to feel wanted and desired by someone. To focus so much energy on one aspect of that dance incites other areas to worsen as well. In counseling, sex is the first indicator people complain about when other things are actually wrong.

      So, if one is feeling as if they are being controlled by someone else and they don’t like it, they need to discuss this with their partner, irregardless if the weapon is sex or cleaning.

      • P Ray
        March 1, 2012 at 5:14 am

        Maybe the wife’s “lower libido” comes from the understanding that
        1) you can’t leave her for better
        2) she can divorce you in court for all you are worth
        3) it only isn’t happening yet because she is fairly certain she can’t find another man interested in her?

        It takes a person of character to resist the impulse to screw others over for an advantage when it is so easy to do so. I hope your wife is one of those persons of character, and she takes the time to show you she cares in other ways if sex is off the table.

      • joesantus
        November 8, 2014 at 2:46 pm

        “….I hope your wife is one of those persons of character, and she takes the time to show you she cares in other ways if sex is off the table.”

        DITTO.

        For example, in my case, my wife for nearly 35-years-married has shown me that care by, among other ways, totally permitting me, no strings, to have extra-marital sex partners to take up the slack when her libido has plummeted at times for various reasons during our marriage.

        She herself has long said, “If a wife expects a man to stay with her but she loses interest in sex with him, then she’s a selfish, unreasonable bitch if she won’t allow him to get casual sex elsewhere.”

  10. October 17, 2013 at 8:34 pm

    People are losing power and authority over others. People aren’t scared of people anymore and our options are on the increase.

    • EvilOne
      February 28, 2014 at 12:47 am

      I dont believe this for a second. People (men) are becoming more violent and thug like. Women, for their part, are using more proxy violence via laws.

      • August 27, 2014 at 2:21 pm

        Yes, but we are all individuals. Meaning we all have choices, which includes whether or not we will allow other folks to prevent us from doing what comes naturally. Me? I’m not letting a Motherfucker tell me to live hand to mouth. Anyone else? The choice is theirs.

        This blog reminds me of a video I saw about how women created the “prohibition” and in the early 20th century, they tried to enforce laws to make alcohol, bars and coffee shops illegal because they hated how their husbands would rather spend time at bars rather than being with their wives. That actually backfired against their asses. I could go on, but today, history is repeating itself. Again, it will eventually backfire on their asses.

      • EvilOne
        September 1, 2014 at 1:13 pm

        While I do understand that some people might be way more nihilistic than me, or have an expanded awareness beyond mine, or an easier life – your answer just went over my head.

        Perhaps you should have said people are losing “authority” over others, rather than “power and authority”.

        Power is very much there, and very very dangerous.

        Exerting power without authority speeds its demise.

      • EvilOne
        September 1, 2014 at 5:04 pm

        “Exerting power without authority speeds its demise.”

        No, it leads to a primitive state. There is power in a primitive state as well … the well connected and gangsters and big n’ beefy win.

        So tell me something.. why did entities such as the former communist states in eastern europe collapse.

  11. Jack
    August 27, 2014 at 4:58 pm

    However, there is countries (religions and governments) that currently have banned porn, or currently want to ban porn. Most of these religious extremists, lawyers, and governments are guys who want to control the sexuality of women and of other guys as a tool for more religious and political power. There is even an odd trend currently among self-appointed “game” gurus who are guys telling other guys not to watch porn just like the religious extremists say. If I said I want new shoes, and then I kept saying I hate shoes and my religion tells me not to look at shoes, then that mentality would be illogical and people would view me as mentally crazy. It is very strange that more guys are jumping on the bandwagon against porn lead by other guys who maybe feel a sense of control over other guys. I know more girls in favor of porn than guys currently. I discontinued being friends with a guy who became an anti-porn religious fanatic. If I get ten girls in a room at different times I can creatively get about eight to watch some “educational porn” and at least five will be interested in watching it and possibly trying it. With the people I see it’s more of the guys who are sexually repressive and think porn is bad, and I find this very odd. Being form a conservative and very religious town I have always been grateful to be able to watch some porn because it showed me that unlike what religious fanatics are preaching that there really are people in the world having sex and I could to. I do not trust or consider credible any guy who says he does like watching at least some porn, and especially any guy or religion who tells me not to watch porn at all. I am a masculine man and I enjoy watching porn. I will not continue to “go out with” a woman who won’t watch some “instructional porn” for things we can try next. That’s why I’m into the women who like porn and the women escort types who are open to trying new things. I do not associate with anyone who is against porn, and it has become one of my screening questions for me to decide who to continue to spend my time with.

  12. Jack
    August 27, 2014 at 5:15 pm

    There is a typo towards the bottom of my previous comment and it should be, “I do not trust or consider credible any guy who says he does NOT like watching at least some porn,…”

  13. jon
    September 27, 2014 at 6:23 am

    ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha, this famous porn star (extremely hot) was in my city trying to get a 1000. an hour; after I tried to chisel her down to 10 minutes for a hundred bucks and she wouldn’t budge, I just emailed her and told her what is basically in this article LOL plus I have all her pics on my pc and the solo sex is the best ive ever had

  14. joesantus
    October 1, 2014 at 9:19 pm

    “No woman in the relationship sex mode can compete with the hundreds and thousands of attention-whores who will always look better, younger and be less bitchier than a ‘real’ woman.”

    Relates to a point I use to counter the “religions-were-created-by-men-to-control-women!” insistence by feministas — I ask, “Or, is it that religions became successful only after they were embraced by women who saw religious condemnations of non-procreative and/or extra-marital sexuality as an opportunity to control their men?”

  1. June 26, 2011 at 6:08 pm
  2. October 30, 2011 at 12:26 pm
  3. February 29, 2012 at 10:00 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: