Archive

Archive for July 25, 2011

CONservatives and Right Wingers are Pussies

July 25, 2011 28 comments

I am going to keep this post short and to the point. So let us begin-

Have you noticed that CONservative and Right Wing sites, blogs and commentators have been largely quiet, willfully ignorant or apologetic about the whole Breivik event?

How come? Aren’t Breivik’s actions and worldview consistent with a traditionalist-type worldview. If anything, his views are far more moderate and rationally put together than many CONservatives or Right Wingers.

More importantly, the guy acted on his beliefs.

So why are people who expouse those same or similar views so quiet or apologetic? Where is the spine? Where is the commitment? Where is the support? Where is the solidarity? I find myself in the peculiar position of not being dismissive towards that guy’s ideologies and actions- inspite of my known antipathy towards CONservatism.

It comes down to intellectual honesty and having a backbone. Even if I don’t condone his actions and some views- it is obvious that the guy has a genuine set of grievances and coherent world view. To put it another way- he is not mentally ill, delusional or even particularly narcissistic. He is just someone who did not like the world he was living in and decided to change it.

While his methods of changing the world are not exactly endearing, he did get what he wanted- extensive attention to his cause. Even in term of sheer brutality, he scores much lower than many political figures alive today. So why are CONservatives and Right Wingers not supporting him?

In my opinion, they are pussies who talk a lot but without the will to act or even stand behind someone who does it for them.

It is far easier to talk about uppity blacks, IQ, traditionalism and other assorted bullshit than act on it. CONservatives are very similar to dogs who look at somebody else for approval or punishment- aka house slave mentality. Whether that master is the current ruling system, boss, wife, girlfriend- they exist to supplicate their master’s desire because of an illusory fear of loss. Anyway, I find this all quite entertaining.

Comments?

Sex In Breivik’s Manifesto

July 25, 2011 25 comments

OK, another post on the infamous guy du jour. This one concerns his views on sex. Start from page 1170 on his manifesto..

An alarming number of young girls in Oslo, Norway start giving oral sex from the age of 11 to 12. This might happen at an even younger age if sexual education is liberalised further. This development must be reversed to avoid complete collapse in our traditional social structures. Approximately 50% of my female friends end up under the definition/category; promiscuous (female sluts) as they have engaged in sexual activity with more than 20 partners. A majority of them have been infected with one or more sexually transmitted diseases –so called STDs such as herpes, chlamydia etc.

Hmm.. a bit alarmist but otherwise conventional.

A promiscuous lifestyle is glorified by the media through series such as Sex and the City and artists such as Madonna, Lady Gaga, Christina Aguilera and a multitude of other much nastier artists. The boundaries are gradually deteriorating as this development is allowed to continue. We cannot judge individuals too hard who follow media guidelines but we can and should do everything to restrict the massive influence that the media has.

Ahh.. blame the media!

I am not going to act like a hypocrite and pretend I have not been influenced by the typical “Sex and the City” lifestyle.I have been under the influence of this lifestyle as a majority of my friends and even my own family members. I used to be proud of my “achievements”. However, due to a change of mentality, all I feel is shame whenever I think about where this is going. I feel shame on behalf of my city, my country and my
civilisation.

Interpreting this requires a lot more background information than is available now, but will soon be. I am interested in events in his life before he became a CONservative- how they shaped him.

Why is he ashamed? What did he do before he felt ashamed about his “achievements”?

Although I have had a change of mentality a majority of my friends have not. My
stepfather Tore, one of my best friends Marius and my more distant friends Kristoffer,
Sturla and Ronny are all living manifestations of the complete breakdown of sexual
moral. All five have had more than 300 sexual partners (two of them more than 700) and I know for a fact that three of them have one or more STDs (probably all of them). I have several other promiscuous (slut) friends and I could list at least 30 male and
females in my social environment if I wanted to. I don’t blame them personally and it has absolutely nothing to do with envy. I could easily have chosen the same path if I wanted to, due to my looks, status, resourcefulness and charm.

I wonder.. how they went through so many without paying for it. On another note- Why didn’t he?

My half sister, Elisabeth was infected by chlamydia after having more than 40 sexual partners (more than 15 Chippendales’ strippers who are known to be bearers of various diseases). Her chlamydia went untreated and she became one of several million
US/European women who were suffering from PID, Pelvic inflammatory disease caused by untreated gonorrhea and chlamydia which leads to infertility. As she lives in the US, costs relating to this were not covered by the state. She and her husband spent 40 000- 50 000 USD on two IVF treatments (in vitriol fertilisation) a process by which egg cells are fertilised by sperm outside the womb. She was lucky compared to many as these treatments may cost upwards of 100 000 USD. Furthermore, as far as I know, due to her condition as a result of the untreated disease, she needed a caesarean section for both childbirths. The last c-section almost killed her due to complications and she needed blood transfusion of more than 5 litres of blood in total.

His half-sister looks like an interesting woman.. any pictures?

My mother was infected by genital herpes by her boyfriend (my stepfather), Tore, when she was 48. Tore, who was a captain in the Norwegian Army, had more than 500 sexual partners and my mother knew this but suffered from lack of good judgement and moral due to several factors (media – glorification of certain stereotypes being one).

*S*

Unfortunately for her, her poor judgment resulted in her being afflicted by genital herpes.In addition to this, the herpes infection went to her brain and caused meningitis (this condition is usually rare and occurs in less than 1% of herpes infected individuals). As a result of this brain infection, which prevented the spinal fluid from flowing freely, she had to operate a shunt into her brain as the herpes attacks occurred regularly. She was forced into early retirement as a result and her life quality has been significantly reduces since, and she now has the intellectual capacity of a 10 year old.

Is this true? Independent verification would be necessary.

In any case, it appears that everyone around him was screwing and getting a few STDs. So why did he not partake? There is something behind his views on sexuality which I cannot put my finger on. What do you think?

Comments?

On The Rationality of Breivik’s Actions and Public Reactions

July 25, 2011 6 comments

This post is about a rational and objective analysis of Breivik’s actions and public reactions to them. I am not considering any of the emotional, legal, cultural, ethical, sexual or other aspects of this event- as there are many others doing that right now. Also, as most of you know – I have no sympathy for CONservative worldviews like his.

Let me begin by stating one very obvious, but often unmentioned, aspect of this event.

Guys who do stuff like this do not care about your version of reason, religion, ethics, morality etc. There is nothing to stop a guy who is competent and willing to die for what he believes in. It is also obvious that he had thought through his actions.

Now let us look at other aspects of that event.

1. What about killing kids? Is that not bad PR? What about ethics, morality etc?

Answer- If you condemn this guy for killing so many kids, what about members of the US army and airforce who have done the same to kids in Afghanistan, Iran or Vietnam? What about their morality, ethics, religiosity?

Unless you believe that a non-white child has less implicit value than a dog, you cannot say that he was especially evil. If anything he was far more honest about the effects of his actions than your average US soldier. There is of course the defense of ‘just following orders’ aka the Nuremberg Defense.

2. What about his worldview? Was killing so many justified for it?

Answer- What about Winston Churchill. Was starving millions in India during WW2 justified? What does that say about his worldview? What about Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot? What about Josef Mengele or Shiro Ishii? Didn’t all these people pretty much get home free inspite of their actions and ideologies? Compared to these people, Breivik’s actions are pinpricks.

Moreover don’t many CONservative cocksuckers worship Churchill inspite of his fuckups and needless genocides? What about Mao’s legacy? Didn’t the USA employ Shiro Ishii after WW2? On a scale of fuckedupness, Breivik scores much lower than many popular leaders from the last century.

3. What about the effects of his actions on his cause?

Two words- Who Cares?

People do all sorts of fucked up things for far more selfish reasons. Doctors prescribe anti-psychotics to hundreds of thousands of kids without considering long-term effects or even therapeutic efficacy- all because of peer pressure or monetary considerations. A very significant part of health care expenditure goes on similar known useless to harmful services and products. But who cares? Does the insurance company who uninsures a cancer survivor care about his/her well-being? What about the government who gives trillions to large financial institutions and cuts benefits to people who cannot find jobs?

People scam, hurt and kill each other over cartels, traditions, “laws” and similar assorted bullshit- and that is considered “normal”. Ask yourself- if those things are “normal” can you really condemn what he did.

While what he did is atrocious we routinely do/accept far worse and justify it.

Comments?