Home > Critical Thinking, Current Affairs, Musings, Reason, Secular Religions, Skepticism > CONservatives and Right Wingers are Pussies

CONservatives and Right Wingers are Pussies

I am going to keep this post short and to the point. So let us begin-

Have you noticed that CONservative and Right Wing sites, blogs and commentators have been largely quiet, willfully ignorant or apologetic about the whole Breivik event?

How come? Aren’t Breivik’s actions and worldview consistent with a traditionalist-type worldview. If anything, his views are far more moderate and rationally put together than many CONservatives or Right Wingers.

More importantly, the guy acted on his beliefs.

So why are people who expouse those same or similar views so quiet or apologetic? Where is the spine? Where is the commitment? Where is the support? Where is the solidarity? I find myself in the peculiar position of not being dismissive towards that guy’s ideologies and actions- inspite of my known antipathy towards CONservatism.

It comes down to intellectual honesty and having a backbone. Even if I don’t condone his actions and some views- it is obvious that the guy has a genuine set of grievances and coherent world view. To put it another way- he is not mentally ill, delusional or even particularly narcissistic. He is just someone who did not like the world he was living in and decided to change it.

While his methods of changing the world are not exactly endearing, he did get what he wanted- extensive attention to his cause. Even in term of sheer brutality, he scores much lower than many political figures alive today. So why are CONservatives and Right Wingers not supporting him?

In my opinion, they are pussies who talk a lot but without the will to act or even stand behind someone who does it for them.

It is far easier to talk about uppity blacks, IQ, traditionalism and other assorted bullshit than act on it. CONservatives are very similar to dogs who look at somebody else for approval or punishment- aka house slave mentality. Whether that master is the current ruling system, boss, wife, girlfriend- they exist to supplicate their master’s desire because of an illusory fear of loss. Anyway, I find this all quite entertaining.

Comments?

  1. Andrew
    July 25, 2011 at 8:24 pm

    What’s there to say? Conservatives that publicly support this would be slaughtered by the media and it would be ultimately detrimental to their cause. YOU’RE the fucking pussy who is angry at the world, has to pay to get laid and hides behind anonymity. Put your real name on this site, otherwise STFU.

    Hmm.. So they are afraid? of what?

    Isn’t it typical of CONservatives to get some guy to do their dirty work for them, while denying any connection with him?

    • fubar
      July 25, 2011 at 9:09 pm

      People aren’t going to get notified of your replies if you just edit their comments. Why don’t you use the reply feature?

    • Nestorius
      July 25, 2011 at 11:57 pm

      “Conservatives that publicly support this would be slaughtered by the media and it would be ultimately detrimental to their cause.”

      Doesn’t this prove that they are pussies who have already lost?

    • July 26, 2011 at 12:32 pm

      Diablo, that’s called plausible deniability, a key feature in the Iran Contra affair….

      That is part of why those people and feminists love terms like “man up.” That is why they love to define masculinity….

      Only in America does a draft dodger become Prez and a Veteran homeless….

      Fuck This Shit!

  2. A Equals A
    July 25, 2011 at 9:05 pm

    “It is far easier to talk about uppity blacks, IQ, traditionalism and other assorted bullshit than act on it.”

    And my how they love talking about blacks. Maybe that should be the subject of your next blog post. Their irrational fixation (obsession) with blacks.

  3. Dreamer
    July 25, 2011 at 9:38 pm

    Aren’t you concluding in the most negative fashion possible? It does seem that his ideology coincide with many tenets of right-wingers and conservatives, but as you said yourself, all he did is shot such ideology in the foot. Saying “so they are afraid? of what?” doesn’t negate that a huge media backlash and massive loss of support is something to be afraid of. For such parties, gaining political influence as they have been in Europe, for bloggers, the ability to persuade new readers.

    So the answer to why conservatives and right wingers are not supporting him: because his methods are immoral, extreme, and ultimately detrimental. Listing the acts of similar acts of soldiers or how Mao, Pol Pot, Stalin, or Churchill got away with acts why they are much more heinous than Breivik doesn’t change that it was heinous. If you say that is hypocritical, no one is rushing to give solidarity to the crimes from his ideology of those historical figures either. And such support would be equally or even more detrimental.

    You are correct about the quietness though. However, I see it understandable, hard to find anything to really say about him unless they want to give a defense for him (which who would do that both for moral reasons and self-interest). Still, they have to acknowledge that there’s a guy who just went out touting many of their ideals and did something stupid.

  4. July 25, 2011 at 10:40 pm

    Another fag post by this fag blogger.

    • c-bama
      July 26, 2011 at 12:49 am

      you’re mad!!

    • July 26, 2011 at 12:34 pm

      hahahaha,

      is that your passive aggressive way of hitting on diablo?

  5. Commander Shepard
    July 25, 2011 at 10:59 pm

    Oh shut up Piggy and go back to the confines of your stupid blog where everybody can brown nose your “brilliance”.

    “Conservatives that publicly support this would be slaughtered by the media and it would be ultimately detrimental to their cause” -Andrew.

    So what? I thought the media was out to get them anyway? Furthermore conservative bloggers have anonymity. Most are silent on Brevik or are making excuses like mental illness. What cowards and hypocrites. This man stands for everything they believe in plus he murdered a bunch of liberals who are supposedly destroying everything sacred and good. They ought to embrace this man as a hero.

    • July 26, 2011 at 1:04 am

      i think c-bama’s comment was meant for you.

      you’re an idiot for not being able to discern the difference between an ideological viewpoint and the strategy for implementing that viewpoint. conservatives, by and large, don’t stand for mass murder, and they don’t advocate snuffing out liberal voices. going ad absurdum is the domain of the weak-minded.

      • Commander Shepard
        July 26, 2011 at 8:58 am

        If Brevik had been a muslim does anyone think Piggy and his ilk would be making nuanced distinctions between the individual and his ideology? Hell no. He’d be doing blog entries mocking any PC efforts to do so. The irony here is hilarious.

      • c-bama
        July 26, 2011 at 10:08 am

        actually its for you.I’m Black and I will tip you some $ someday

  6. Nestorius
    July 25, 2011 at 11:56 pm

    Both Rightists and Leftists will be pissing in their pants after the Breivik affair, not only because they are all worthless effeminate pussies, but also because the rules of the game have changed and because Breivik is one of them not some exotic Muslim.

    Both can’t compete with persons like Breivik because he has learnt from Ben-Laden and the Muslims how to deal with Westerners. While they could appease Muslims by building them mosques and other things (few years ago, the Communist Party around Paris was collecting money to build a mosque), none of them will be able to appease Breivik and his likes.

    Consider Europe from now on a totally different place. The EU is dead.

    Have in mind also that this incident might also inspire Mexicans and Blacks to use force on a larger scale in the USA itself.

  7. Columnist
    July 26, 2011 at 1:22 am

    Nestorius :Both Rightists and Leftists will be pissing in their pants after the Breivik affair, not only because they are all worthless effeminate pussies, but also because the rules of the game have changed and because Breivik is one of them not some exotic Muslim.

    Yes, the rules of the game have changed. I dissaprove of his ideology, but I apporve of his methods.

    Have in mind also that this incident might also inspire Mexicans and Blacks to use force on a larger scale in the USA itself.

    It certainly will.

  8. July 26, 2011 at 2:13 am

    Er, riiight. So to your er, ‘mind’, such as it is, ‘improving the world’ means the random mass murder of unarmed teenagers? So you’re ill, then. A moral misfit. I’m a creative conservative and not a destructive nihilist, thus a diseased pervert like Anders has NOTHING I want and NOTHING I need. Gee, give me ten minutes with him unarmed… Let’s see how his er, ‘philosophy holds up’. Anders is a weird stew of Euroweenie moral relativist shallowness and humourless Norwegian circus geek cum criminal mind.

    Conservatism is a set of four principles. Respect for The Constitution, RESPECT for life, limited government and low taxes and personal repsonsibility. None of this is part of that uber-creeps tiny world. He is a perfect fit for any totalitarian, fascist, nationalist, Commie, Islamist or Nazi ideology. He merely has other justifications and has moved the furniture around. Interesting that he attacked children and not say, armed men. YOU need to learn from great men of freedom and responsibility within the rule of law, like Bill Whittle, Andrew Klavan, Mark Steyn, Jamie Glazov, Jonah Goldberg, Reagan, iowhawk typepad com and Congressman Lt Col Allen B West. Anders is a disgusting circus geek. No, really. Colonel Neville.

  9. July 26, 2011 at 2:13 am

    Oops. iowahawk typepad com.

  10. demirogue
    July 26, 2011 at 4:45 am

    Oh hell yeah. Are they afraid of the government coming down on them or the left though?

    Never thought I’d see some of the conservative blogs out there moderate their comments but funny how even they become PC as to not offend their overlords.

    Here’s some advice guys. Your viewpoints are anti-PC and if the leftist could, they’d come into your homes and kill you just as quick and as brutally as this guy did in Norway. The exception being that it would be the police or some other government entity pulling the trigger though.

    Think about Katrina for a second. Nagin declared the area gun free after the melee started. There’s a video out there of an old lady being taken down by 3 or 4 heavily armed cops in her own home for refusing to give up her pistol. Her only means of self defense. That’s the left in all its glory.

  11. AnonymousDragon
    July 26, 2011 at 4:51 am

    His ideology is irrelevant. Violent killers have supported every cause under the sun. The uni bomber’s ideas squared with Al Gore’s nearly perfectly.

  12. AnonymousDragon
  13. PT Barnum
    July 26, 2011 at 5:22 am

    Oh it’s worse than that. On In Mala Fide, poor Southern White GL Piggy had a mental breakdown when I suggest his masters, who love him and would never hurt him, who are so powerful and who he is scared pissless of, might be the force behind illegal immigration.

    You see, he hates brown people, but he fears his fell lords.He simply blames everything his fell lords do on darkies. The problem is, if his fell lords are the ones importing the darkies.. then… then…. master no love good slave?

    They are way, way beyond pussies.He actually said “small” group of businesses that support illegal immigration. On another thread in In Mala Fide, I got in a big argument with a bunch of Conservative swine about illegal immigration. It’s pathetic.

  14. c-bama
    July 26, 2011 at 10:09 am

    c-bama :
    actually its for you.I’m Black and I will tip you some $ someday

    for GL Piggy

    • July 26, 2011 at 11:45 am

      i won’t hold my breath blackman

  15. Mr. Stricter
    July 26, 2011 at 12:12 pm

    The Left and the Right outside the fringes are part of the system. It gives most of the decently smart ones some standard of living, decent physical safety and enough wiggle room to mostly live as they wish.

    Also down at the roots and bones much of the political class are still informed by Enlightenment ideals and a basic acceptance of the legitimacy of the other side. Once that goes, its not certain that any kind of comfortable happy life will return for anyone for a very long time.

    Its little wonder they don’t want to kill it.

  16. Mr. Stricter
    July 26, 2011 at 3:16 pm

    Colonel Neville :
    Er, riiight. So to your er, ‘mind’, such as it is, ‘improving the world’ means the random mass murder of unarmed teenagers? So you’re ill, then. A moral misfit. SNIP

    Talk about missing the point.

    #1 All wars kill random unarmed kids around the age of his targets (16-22) either directly by shooting them, indirectly as “collateral damage” or by smashing their infrastructure and starving them. That doesn’t include more genocidal regimes BTW who do far worse.

    #2 These were not random victims like say a school shooter would kill. These were selected teenagers being groomed by the elite to replace them. Its not abnormal, immoral or even strange to select people like that for actions . Grotesque as it is to our modern sensibilities, its the normal way wars were fought not long ago. Now in theory we have tried to move away from such things and resist mass killings and decap strikes vs leaders and all that as an attempt to keep global stability but as the US seems to no longer care much for those rules, one cannot expect anyone else too either. After Panama(roughly) and the US and other nations willingness to ignore presumed sovereign immunity for other than war crimes the game started to end and we should expect to see a lot more all out wars. As Ye Sow Ye Reap

    #3 Its comforting to say this guy was rampage killer or to take the media’s message that he was crazy and while certainly there is a little truth in both statements, the bigger picture is that Breivik wanted to accomplish his goals and decided the best way to do them is to take the fight to the children of his enemies. its straightforward and logical. Breaking the current status quo or rules of war or even killing teens, armed or unarmed is not a sign of mental illness, beta-tude or any of the other things. Its simply an act of war by an individual vs a state

    Now this guy will have to face the consequences of his actions and if he ends up murdered in prison or “killing himself” or condemned to a nuthouse for political crimes (which is what I think will happen as an attempt to discredit and control) thems the breaks.

  1. July 26, 2011 at 12:37 pm
  2. July 26, 2011 at 6:39 pm
  3. July 31, 2011 at 4:17 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: