Home > Ape Mind, Critical Thinking, Current Affairs, Dystopia, Musings, Reason, Secular Religions, Skepticism, Technology > A Spoof on the Beliefs of Religious Nutjobs

A Spoof on the Beliefs of Religious Nutjobs

As some of you might have heard, Newt Gingrich the great crusader for personal responsibility and defender of black enslavement is having a little problem with an exposure of his past. It seems that Newt wanted an open marriage with his second wife so that he could screw other women while being married to her.

Then again, his position could be based on the bible.. what do you think?

Comments?

  1. January 19, 2012 at 6:10 pm

    y’know there’s an old joke….

    what’s the difference between a Democrat and a republican?

    The Dem cheats on his wife/the Repub on his taxes….

    now I’m not so sure….

  2. Kaz
    January 19, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    Yeah stoner, they both cheat on both.

  3. Columnist
    January 19, 2012 at 10:58 pm

    Well, uh, most Orthodox Jews, Muslims, and even Pagans would agree that polygyny is better than gay marriage. Catholic Natural Law openly admits that polygyny is Natural, but gay marriage isn’t.

    Let’s not forget the abomination of feminist marriage, where men are robbed by alimony.

  4. Scythian Warrior
    January 20, 2012 at 2:38 pm

    Open marriages and polyamorous relationships will be the norm in western society within 3 decades. Its well on the upswing now. I have to say, I don’t think its entirely a bad idea, if done right.

    • Columnist
      January 21, 2012 at 11:17 am

      That is indeed likely, unless monogamous Christians succeed in the breeding war.

      Monogamous societies have a habit of not just killing the men, but also the women and children of conquered peoples.

  5. January 21, 2012 at 9:56 am

    AD, What’s your email? How can I contact you?

    A comment with more than two links.. so it automatically ends up in the moderation que.

  6. Cultured Indian Lady
    January 21, 2012 at 8:58 pm

    “As some of you might have heard, Newt Gingrich the great crusader for personal responsibility and defender of black enslavement”

    Newt did not defend black enslavement. What he said, from your link, was;
    —-

    I don’t like sock puppets.

    Newt Gingrich on Monday continued to stand by comments he has made suggesting that poor children should serve as janitors to earn money – arguing not only that kids would benefit from the work but also that you could hire “30-some kids to work in the school for the price of one janitor.”

    I can do one better than that. Forget paying poor kids to do the janitor work. ALL students from elementary through university, whether rich or poor, should be rotating the janitor work, cafeteria duties and other menial labor in their schools FOR FREE.

    Its their school and if they want to learn in a clean and organized environment, then they should be responsible for keeping it that way and not trashing it.

    But the one thing neither Newt’s nor my idea addresses is where will all the otherwise janitors get jobs now? Isn’t Newt all about “job creation” and “working hard to achieve the great American dream?”

    Is Newt going to hire all those unemployed janitors to clean the bathrooms of all the “devout Catholic” women he has affairs with?

    Bwahahahahahahahaha!

    Conservative my ass. Americans wouldn’t know “conservativism” if it bit them on their ugly pink balls.

  7. Robert
    January 21, 2012 at 10:35 pm

    Newt’s comment was more a swipe at Unions than anything else.

  8. Robert
    January 21, 2012 at 10:36 pm

    If I could afford it I’d leave the USA. Any suggestions AD or Nestorius ?

    • MaMu1977
      January 29, 2012 at 2:00 pm

      Switzerland.

      Yes, I know that I’m neither one of those guys. I still stand by my statement.

  9. P Ray
    July 20, 2012 at 11:09 pm

    From my huge quote file:
    “Here’s a liberal guy writing some stuff on gay marriage who’s inadvertently proving the first this point:

    “Because, honestly, which traditional definition of marriage do we want our Constitution to protect?

    …The one from Book of Genesis when family values meant multiple wives and concubines?
    …Or the marriages of the Middle Ages when women were traded like cattle and weddings were too bawdy for church?
    …Since this is America, should we preserve marriage as it existed in 1776 when arranged marriages were still commonplace?
    …Or the traditions of 1850 when California became a state and marriage was customarily between one man and one woman-or-girl of age 11 and up?
    …Or are we really seeking to protect a more modern vision of traditional marriage, say from the 1950s when it was illegal for whites to wed blacks or Hispanics?
    …Or the traditional marriage of the late 1960s when couples were routinely excommunicated for marrying outside their faith?”

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: