The Cock Carousel as Art

The idea of women having casual sex with multiple men beginning in their mid-teens and continuing until their mid-thirties (or beyond) is known as the riding the ‘cock carousel’ on many blogs. This artsy photograph depicts the concept rather well, if in somewhat of an exaggerated manner.

What do you think? Comments?

  1. Thin-Skinned Masta-Beta
    June 11, 2012 at 12:04 pm

    Source?

    Thanks for the provocative thoughts and images (as always).

    Somewhere on imgur and reddit.

  2. rob k
    June 11, 2012 at 12:33 pm

    if you removed all the condoms it’d be more realistic

  3. hans
    June 11, 2012 at 6:21 pm

    Comments? What do I think?

    Feeling mostly indifference.

    Disgusted and relieved I wasn´t one of the donors to that cumbucket.
    As Rob so aptly noticed, the fantasy here are the condoms.

    Ugh..

    Oh and to all the mangina white-knighters, this is the true face of the “empowad” wimminz.

    NOBODY forced her to spread her legs for all these dicks or rather run from the current one and jump on the next cock-carousel horsie.

  4. June 11, 2012 at 8:21 pm

    or, you could show her smiling and counting cash and she would be an “empowered” business woman…

    AD would be one of her hapless customers…..

    • P Ray
      June 12, 2012 at 2:15 am

      Every man pays a woman for sex, even if she isn’t a prostitute.
      Just the terms of payment may not be cash.
      http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/prostitution/feminist-arguments-against-prostitution-dismantled
      The idea that a man getting sex for “free” ignores how much time and stupidity he had to endure to get it(real relationships of mutual affection are VERY rare).

      • hans
        June 14, 2012 at 9:39 am

        EVERY MAN is getting the sex for free. Women are just as horny as men and HORNIER when the egg drops.

        What we actually pay for is her “companionship” or in the case of whores, her much preferable quick and uncomplicated vacating of the premises.

  5. June 11, 2012 at 8:28 pm

    and, goes w/o saying, the fact my pic ain’t up there shows she’s not interested in quality but quantity….

    • Boner With a Stoner
      June 7, 2013 at 5:08 am

      this my friend made my fucking day, almost a whole year after you posted the comment.

  6. Fyou
    June 12, 2012 at 9:12 am

    She enjoys having sex with many different men, who in turn enjoy having sex with many different women.

    What’s the problem?

  7. June 12, 2012 at 9:23 am

    Hi…

    A couple of years back, I wrote on a blog that I realize now is full of defeatist attitudes how the whole idea of men having to pay to have sex was against the feminist idea of “value for value” in the first place. I really do not have a problem with sex for the sake of sex, if that is one’s choice.

    Immediately, I got responses like “that’s the way it is” and “don’t ya wanna get laid?”

    Really, the problem is very basic, tied to “who owns the means of production” in a very twisted way…and until this notion, so beloved to white knights and manginas, is dispeled, there is little hope for the future.

    • June 12, 2012 at 10:27 am

      They mean sex should only exchanged for sex?

  8. DieHard
    June 12, 2012 at 10:35 am

    Similar to Fyou, I do not have a problem with this. If a guy is not going to get married, then this is basically how it is in the real world. If a guy finds this gross or if he wants to get married to a “good girl” (yeah right), then he better find a girl who is 18 to early 20’s and get married quickly (and he is probably not the only one by then regardless). I am never going to get married, so I’m a player to the end of me. Maybe what most guys don’t like is not the girl, but actually the other guys because they were not “the one and only guy for her AND for every girl in the world.” Some humans can come to accept their bodily functions as a living organism such as, the food they digest and that they use a toilet around 62 times a month. I know some guys who have done way more than this (not speaking about the toilet). I don’t hate on, call names, or put down women because I don’t have to personally to attract plus arouse women and it’s not naturally part of my vibe anyway, thus doing that would distract from my effective natural interactions. I can understand that most guys who see this will go off on their “good guy white-knight defender of the fantasy of purity of all the women in the world – that’s really just a reflection of how they see themselves and wish everyone else was as pure/good as he thinks himself to be,” but I’m fine with it.

    • P Ray
      June 12, 2012 at 3:50 pm

      “Good guy white knight defender of woman purity” gets destroyed the moment he gets to see that many women CHOOSE to have sex with many men.
      Otherwise, they all got raped … by the same men … over and over … for a period of years … in an urban environment where they were not held captive … with so many policemen and women’s shelters?
      The other thing could be that those women were just stupid.
      I am not aware of any cure for that (but I could be wrong).

      • MaMu1977
        June 13, 2012 at 2:24 pm

        PRay got it in one. The biggest reason for the high OOW birthrate in the AA community is *based* on the “No one respects free pussy”, idea. The men who *could* get the hottest girls had no reason to settle down (why stick with *1* girl when you could play the field), and the men who watched as their “empowered sistas” jumped on the carousel (or dumped them to jump back onto the carousel) didn’t want to tie themselves to “older, but wiser” women.

        Or, if a non-racial example works best, I’ll repeat a comment that’s becoming more common among male New Yorkers, “I don’t want to see the same lips that were blowing some guy in the back bathroom at the Leopard Lounge, kissing my kids goodnight.” I don’t know of any man of any background in NYC who *hasn’t* seen at least 1 act of skanky public sex in this city (and considering that I live a few blocks away from Chinatown, that’s terrible. Even the most “demure” {stereotypically speaking} are as likely to be seen giving out blowjobs in public as the “sluttier” cultures.) When you spend a few years averting your eyes week after week as you go to clubs and see the “Girls Gone Wild”, you become disillusioned. When you get your shot to “save” them, then either find yourself not even receiving a respectable amount of sex (in your “nice” apartment that doesn’t smell of public bathroom effluvia such as urine and vomit and coke), or being rejected for being “boring” (and yes, they will show up en masse when the wall is within eyesight to claim that its time to “Man up”. After all, the eggs are almost done and *someone* needs to pay those $100K student loan debts. And don’t you *dare* judge them for that two year patch in which you saw her blow 5 dozen separate guys in the bathrooms of various hot spots!)

        And before anyone asks, there *is* a notorious carousel rider at my local pub. My comment is essentially the head bartender’s complaint about women in NYC.

    • sid
      June 13, 2012 at 8:29 pm

      The men who get pissed off are not pissed off by the men who is getting pussy, most men dont know other men who get regular pussy. Those men who get shocked by their wimmnez are piised off at their wimmenz. Because most guys being more rational and sensible do not see what the women get anything out of the cock carousel and the women really don’t get anything out of it except eventual total destruction. Humans have lived for a long time and have created new generations precisely because they have become comfortable with bodily functions. What most guys dont feel comfortable with is the ever going player lifestyle does not bear any actual real outcomes like kids which apparently former generations of humans didnt have because they didn’t get comfortable with bodily functions if your assumption is to be beleived. There is no ultimate goal or mental satisfaction or emotional satisfaction or accomplishing of our most fundmaental goals as biological entities in this lifestyle, it would have been fruitful strategy in pre contraception times but in current modern america player lifestyle doesn’t really get you anywhere beyond age 30-40, the novelty runs out. Yet times has passed by and there is nothign to show for it except for lots of condoms with dried sperm. I am not actually againts the lifestyle or it’s associated skills and implication regarding gender relations, I am against it when it’s blown up out of all proportions and extended to all aspects of exsistence and becomes reductive to where everything in existence is reduced to a game explanation. I dont see any point to it outside of it’s natural place and boundaries, what most people do is reduce everything in life to whatever they are good at and to whatever they see and gamers are doing that here.

  9. hans
    June 14, 2012 at 10:10 am

    Wow, lot´s of sloppy second (or rather 26th) gang bang lovers around here.

    Well, have fun then finding your cupcake when the current testosterone overdose wears of and you want to settle down and find a worthy companion “´till death do you part”. (HA!)

    Guess it´s not so important for some if her crotchfruit you´re paying for is actually yours.

    Never understood that cuckold fetish, but be “your” guests.

    • P Ray
      June 14, 2012 at 11:15 pm

      external wombs, sexbots, supermodel eggs.
      Men taking responsibility for their children … also means they get to pick the configuration.

  10. December 7, 2013 at 7:46 pm

    Of course, men can always have sex with just about anyone they want and no one bats an eye.lash.

    • P Ray
      December 7, 2013 at 7:57 pm

      Apex fallacy much?
      The biggest reason why in many studies, women have more sex partners than men (eventhough “men have sex with women”) is because …
      most women are having lots of sex with very few men.
      I’ll just sit here and watch your brain explode from the truth. You’re welcome!

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: