More Money and Less Sex

Over many years of viewing amateur-generated porn, I have noticed one trend that is rarely discussed.

Amateurs who make porn are usually young and poor or middle-class.

Pretty much all amateur sex seems to occur in messy room, on or under cheap bed-sheets and worn out comforters, with a background of empty beer bottles, overflowing ashtrays and half-smoked joints. Even the other stuff in the room- from sound systems, computers to laptops and TVs is average. It seem that people with clean rooms, quality comforters, high thread-count cotton sheets and high-end home appliances are conspicuously absent from the amateur porn scene.

But why are people who live an upper-middle class, or better lifestyle, seldom seen in amateur porn?

Some of you might say that upper-middle class or rich people are older and therefore have less sex due to oh.. low hormone levels. OK, that explains the relative infrequency of 50- and 60- year olds having sex on camera. But what about their kids, who are in the ‘right’ age range? Surely, we should be seeing quite a few pictures of their children doing it on camera? But expensive rooms, nice beds, leather couches, posh hotel rooms, new dorm apartments, expensive cars are seldom seen in amateur-generated porn.

Some of you might say that upper-middle class people have ‘old fashioned’ values and mores which prevent them from recording or distributing pictures or videos of themselves having sex. But that runs contrary to the suave, ultra-secular and progressive image that these people try to push- often desperately. Others might say that they are afraid of being recognized because of their high-profile jobs, public image etc- but we have had software like Photoshop to easily blur incriminating parts of a picture for over 15 years. The relative rarity of rich people, as a percentage of the population, might make some sense. But 10-15% of the population is upper middle-class, so expecting 10% of the amateur porn to look like it was shot in a nice suburban house is not unreasonable.

So what is behind the lack of well-off people making amateur porn in an era when it could be done without the limitations, repercussions and other problems that might have explained its absence in previous eras?

I have a theory. It goes something like this.. To make amateur porn you have to first have sex with another willing and enthusiastic human being.

The vast majority of people who live in nice suburban or exurban houses are too occupied with studying for multiple degrees, working hard and competing against each other to enjoy things like sex. These highly evolved beings look down upon the baser pleasures of life such as sex. They would rather spend their time prostituting themselves for a little more money so they can buy more stuff and put on airs to hopefully impress people who don’t give a shit.

Moreover, these avid and hopeful social climbers are not very good at invoking lust and desire in their potential sexual partners. When was the last time you heard a woman gushing over an engineer? Do women see doctors as anything beyond a submissive bitch attached to a fat paycheck? Isn’t that also true for most lawyers? Aren’t women who marry high-flying executives looking for nice cars, expensive furnishings, expensive vacations and big houses? When was the last time you heard a man get an erection because of his woman’s intelligence, education or status? Isn’t it usually the opposite?

But wait.. You too can enjoy expensive, infrequent and mediocre sex with scheming partners by becoming (or aspiring to become) a member of the upper-middle class in western countries.

What do you think? Comments?

  1. P Ray
    June 26, 2012 at 11:39 pm

    A woman who usually tells you what her boyfriend is, rather than how he is, demonstrates that she sees him as a human doing not a human being.
    Of course, too many women are too self-absorbed to think men will ever catch on … or they figure that they will be excused their debauchery because
    girls just wanna have fun.

    Of course, guys can choose who they wanna have fun with for the long term.
    And more of them, are not dealing with these kinds of women for the long term.

  2. ofb
    June 27, 2012 at 4:03 am

    AD, thanks for opening my eyes. Been pouring over this blog past couple days. I thought I there was something wrong with me for not wanting to be in a monogamous relationship after observing my father and others in unexciting marriages. My personal freedom matters a whole lot more than appeasing “society”.

  3. BrianBlack
    June 27, 2012 at 6:01 am

    They use up their energy to get STUFF, instead of getting SOME. It is a “values statement” saying what is more important to them (stuff instead of sex). I often can’t comprehend when I see billionaires with unattractive women because they could literally buy a new hottie every day, but they don’t. Instead of a multi-million dollar house I would rather have more sex. Instead of a car for 300 G’s I would rather be a G with hot women having sex. This decision is a lifestyle choice. More money COULD lead to More sex if a person has the sexual desire (meeting more women, P4P, travel, etc).

    Studios usually produce porn that is either extremely crazy or boring. Amateur porn is often better because it seems more real (it’s easier to project yourself into it because it is something you want to be doing and it is as if you are in this amateur porn).

  4. Nestor
    June 27, 2012 at 6:09 am

    An article on “They Live”, an interesting prophetic movie from 1988:

    • P Ray
      June 27, 2012 at 11:53 am

      That was a great movie.
      “I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass…and I’m all out of bubblegum.”

      • Nestor
        June 27, 2012 at 12:26 pm

        So, this is like a low-budget version of the Matrix from the 1980s?

      • Nestor
        June 27, 2012 at 12:57 pm

        Yes. It’s the prototype of the Matrix one might say. And from this short scene, I can conclude that it is more straightforward than the Matrix with no symbolism at all and with a straight and clear vision of how to act: find the “aliens” and shoot them down.

  5. Nestor
    June 27, 2012 at 10:18 am

    Old news that no one has taken seriously:

    Medvedev Shows Off Sample Coin of New ‘World Currency’ at G-8
    July 10 (Bloomberg) — Russian President Dmitry Medvedev illustrated his call for a supranational currency to replace the dollar by pulling from his pocket a sample coin of a “united future world currency.”

    “Here it is,” Medvedev told reporters today in L’Aquila, Italy, after a summit of the Group of Eight nations. “You can see it and touch it.”

    The coin, which bears the words “unity in diversity,” was minted in Belgium and presented to the heads of G-8 delegations, Medvedev said.

    The question of a supranational currency “concerns everyone now, even the mints,” Medvedev said. The test coin “means they’re getting ready. I think it’s a good sign that we understand how interdependent we are.”

    Medvedev has repeatedly called for creating a mix of regional reserve currencies as part of the drive to address the global financial crisis, while questioning the U.S. dollar’s future as a global reserve currency. Russia’s proposals for the G-20 meeting in London in April included the creation of a supranational currency.

    Here’s the website of the “United Future World Currency”:


  6. June 27, 2012 at 10:26 pm

    diablo, you obviously have money for prostitutes, so why don’t you just use your nerdy tech skills to make your own porno. Pay a prostitute but call her an “actress”, film it and call it “art.” Distribute it and if anyone questions you, just say you are fighting for 1st amendment rights and the fight against puritanism.

    You could do that but you don’t so the answer lies with you….

  7. June 28, 2012 at 5:50 am

    Doing porn, from a woman’s point of view, is a low status behaviour. Even with blurring etc they won’t be able to shake the feeling of having engaged in such behaviour. Upper middle class have a higher social status (jobs, wealth, possessions) and therefore feel worse about low status behaviour. Poorer people have less status to lose and are therefore less bothered.

  8. BrianBlack
    June 29, 2012 at 8:33 am

    With what Dulst said, that’s what I have heard too although for the women who want to do porn they are cool with it themselves, but that it’s because of “this sexually stuck-up and repressive society’s point of view” is the reason women who pose nude or do pro-porn get paid so much to compensate for this so-called decreased social status (according to this society and in the sexual marketplace) lowering of her social status. Many guys would do porn for free anyway just to get some and doing the porn may increase his social status, thus men in porn don’t get paid much for getting laid. Some of the guys in porn do it so much they have to take medication just to get it up again and again.
    Most amateurs are in their teens and twenties so they have messy rooms, messy dorms, or cheap apartments. Even most of the self-shots are by girls being a little naughty in their rooms, but they wouldn’t take these photos or have sex on expensive furniture in the living room because sex is something they hide from their parents. This hiding sex from others (especially parents) mindset continues and by the time they may have a fancy house they are not as sexually expressive then as they over-eat and get worn out have boring careers.
    Or we can be like Charlie S. and trash expensive hotel rooms until they look like a cheap apartment, unless that too is all an act for publicity and image. Hey, maybe he just wants to make the ho feel at home, so that’s an extra price to pay for being so kind.

  9. Nestor
    June 29, 2012 at 10:05 pm

    A Masonic website claiming feminism to have originated from Freemasonry:

    I have no doubts about those claims.

  10. Nestor
    June 29, 2012 at 10:38 pm
  11. Nestor
    June 29, 2012 at 10:44 pm

    Russell C Blackwell, “The Architects of America: How the Freemasons Designed the Republic”:

    Does it matter?

    • Nestor
      June 30, 2012 at 7:41 am

      It doesn’t matter if they don’t exist anymore, but as long as they still exist it matters the most.
      Does it matter if the government of Saudi Arabia or the government of Iran supports a certain sect? Yes it does. Now replace Hanbalite Islam with Freemasonry, it goes to the same thing. At least we know what Hanbalite Islam is, we know how these people think and it’s no secret. But Freemasons, they hold everything secret and they pretend to be a social club while in fact they are a religious sect. They have practiced a great scam over two centuries that only few were aware of it until now thanks to the internet. Now ask me: does it matter?

      What’s the point of downplaying this large deception?

    • Nestor
      June 30, 2012 at 7:47 am

      The American Dream is the Masonic Dream. And this matters the most because the nature of the American dream reflects exactly Masonic ideology and practice. The American Dream is the way it is because it is part of Masonic ideology and practice.

  12. Nestor
    June 29, 2012 at 11:00 pm

    This is just plain sinister: Masonic chip international

  13. Nestor
    June 29, 2012 at 11:28 pm

    “The former wife of U.S. Marine Corps Colonel George Griggs, Chief of Staff, Marine Atlantic/Head of Psychological Operations, NATO, Kay Griggs talks about her first hand knowledge on the real nature of government, military and the power elite.”

  14. Chief of Staff Fergusson
    June 29, 2012 at 11:38 pm


    (billy, when you read this, send the drone. his target serial is KBG.19.ZJ5imZETA, location northern hemisphere, orders from 5gon are for termination. meet you at the clubhouse this weekend, over and out partner)

    • Nestor
      June 30, 2012 at 7:28 am


      Correction: location southern hemisphere. If that is of interest to you.

      • Chief of Staff Fergusson
        June 30, 2012 at 6:07 pm

        Damn, well you got lucky anyway, our drone exploded somewhere over the Atlantic. Lousy electronic chips, I told them not to contract Pringles for manufacture.

        “The goal is to chip everyone”

        Ever notice the resemblance between the Pringles man and the Monopoly man? It’s one of our subliminal conditioning attacks designed to make everyone accept our monopoly on chipping the people, when the time arrives. As I said, we are cumming for jooz!

      • Nestor
        July 1, 2012 at 4:42 am

        Pringles is disgusting and sucks.

  15. Nestor
    June 30, 2012 at 7:30 am

    Btw AD, you site attracts many of these lunatics for one simple reason: you call yourself Advocatus Diaboli and these lunatics worship this non-existent thing called Satan.

  16. Nestor
    June 30, 2012 at 7:45 am

    “Hollywood director Russo goes in-depth for first time on the astounding admissions of Nick Rockefeller, including his prediction of 9/11 and the war on terror hoax, the Rockefeller’s creation of women’s lib, and the elite’s ultimate plan for world population reduction and a microchipped society Aaron Russo joins Alex Jones for a fascinating sit-down in depth video interview on a plethora of important subjects. Aaron begins by describing how the draconian and mafia tactics of Chicago police woke him up to the fact that America wasn’t free after his nightclub was routinely raided and he was forced to pay protection money. Aaron and Alex then cover a broad range of topics including the private run for profit federal reserve, Aaron’s experience in the late 80’s with the IRS when they retroactively passed laws to punish silver and gold traders, the real meaning of the word “democracy,” what really happened on 9/11 and Aaron’s relationship with Nick Rockefeller, who personally tried to recruit him on behalf of the CFR. Aaron also relates how Rockefeller told him that the elite created women’s liberation to destroy the family and how they want to ultimately microchip and control the entire population. Rockefeller also told before 9/11 Russo that an unexpected “event” would catalyze the U.S. to invade Afghanistan and Iraq.”

    Nick Rockefeller told Aaron Russo: “The goal is to chip everyone”. It seems that they have already started the plan. Now, I’m not implying that they will succeed in it; but real public awareness is needed.

  17. Nestor
    June 30, 2012 at 7:55 am

  18. July 5, 2012 at 2:22 am

    Have you thought maybe: Rich people are smart enough not to get themselves put on the internet having sex?

  1. June 30, 2012 at 7:00 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: