Home > Critical Thinking, Current Affairs, Dystopia, Musings, Reason, Secular Religions, Skepticism, Technology, Thoughts on Economics > An Observation about “American Pie: Reunion” (2012)

An Observation about “American Pie: Reunion” (2012)

One of the more peculiar aspects of the american movie production system is that it can create very good products at the periphery of mainstream cinema. So while the average well-funded “blockbuster” is usually very formulaic and predictable, a lot of the sleeper hits and cult classics are not. I would argue that the innovativeness of american cinema is largely based on its ability to incorporate the lessons learned from atypical and non-formulaic hits into more mainstream productions. While I can go about which blockbusters were influenced by far more modest precursors- that is a topic best reserved for another post. This post is about how movies or movie series that became unexpected hits often end up telling us far more about the society we live in than they were intended to.

I am sure that almost every one of you has seen at least one movie in the infamous American Pie Series. However many of you might not know that the original American Pie (1999) was a low-budget shot in the dark. Indeed, most people involved in making and acting in that movie thought that it was unlikely to recover its 11 million $ budget let alone make a huge profit, start a series and jump-start the careers of many actors.

So why was the original movie and most of its major sequels so successful?

There are those who attribute the success to gross-out humor and appealing to teenage male sensibilities. However that does not explain why many other movies with similar themes and even raunchier story lines have bombed. I believe that the success of the original movie in that series (and the subsequent major sequels) is largely due to the fact the characters in that movie are far more realistic than many other similarly themed movies. Furthermore, the story lines were far closer to reality than “professional” movie critics realized.

That movie series (major sequels only) is a fairly accurate representation of the behavior, trends and attitudes of the children of white upper-middle class baby boomers over the last 13-odd years. Whether it is girls in high school controlling who gets sex, how teenagers define virginity, how long -distance relationships work or don’t work, how over the hill middle-aged women use sex with much younger guys to feel validated, using pseudo-lesbianism to get attention, awkward hookups and so on. It also showed the main characters going to good universities, working hard, trying to get decent jobs.. in other words- doing what was expected of them as they tried to join the upper-middle class as “functional adults”.

So let us turn our attention to the latest movie in that series- American Pie: Reunion (2012). Once again , it distinguishes itself from the formulaic Hollywood movie sequel by being pretty realistic. For one, neither of the four guys are happy at the beginning of the movie nor are they really happy at the end. The sappy beta ‘Jim’ character is wanking off to internet porn inspite of being married to his dream girl aka ‘band camp’ Michelle who is using a flexible shower head to get off. The intellectual Finch has a dead-end lower-management job at a big box store inspite of his intellect and education. The Kevin character is an unhappy whipped house-husband who hates what he has become. Stifler can only manage a temp job in some investment firm inspite of his family connections. Even Oz who now has the model girlfriend is less than happy with his life.

I believe that the movie accurately depicts what has happened to children of upper-middle class baby boomers. While their parents had opportunities to settle down into an acceptable and reasonably stable existence with some correlation to their ability, their kids just do not have the jobs and careers that they rightfully expected. Note that only ‘Jim’ has a somewhat stable and conventional job and only he has the one child among his four high-school friends- even though they are all in their early 30s. The rest have had some combination of short and long-term relationships with no desire to have kids. Did I mention that the movie does not have an “all problems are solved and everybody is happy” ending.

None of them wants to “grow up”, “man up” or “take one for family”.

I believe that it accurately represents the general outlook and behavior of the male children of affluent baby boomers. Most have no desire to slave away like their fathers, especially given that the previous set of rewards for such behavior are gone. Most have seen divorces and their ugly aftermath and therefore have little interest in marriage or committed long-term relationships. Most can only get jobs that are crappy, unstable or pay significantly less than they had been implicitly promised. Even the most traditional in that age group have significant distrust and cynicism about the women- including those in their lives.

Most men in that age and socio-economic group just don’t see themselves as having a stake in the future and act accordingly.

What do you think? Comments?

  1. whatever
    October 6, 2012 at 4:15 pm

    WF Price whines about just this “problem” in his last Spearhead article “Honey Boo Boo Child and Incentives”. He is concerned that when things go crazy the poor will not die in an approved and proper manner. Yes, yes, “upper middle class” isn’t the poor, but I would argue that the rot goes all the way through. ALL 20-40 year old’s not in the 1% get to suffer.

  2. P Ray
    October 6, 2012 at 8:32 pm

    The other observation is that none of those guys were dating younger.
    An average woman doesn’t become her most attractive at 30, if anything she’s been through the wringer and pumped and dumped several times already.
    Seems that movies have a problem with men who don’t want to put themselves through that kind of misery.

  3. hans
    October 8, 2012 at 4:33 am

    And then there a flics like “Up in the Air” with Clooney that show a tiny view of reality, don´t have a happy ending and are very well acted and filmed.
    But tank like a lead duck.

    ´mericans want their happy ending pacifier, simple as that.

  4. Ras Al Ghul
    October 8, 2012 at 8:45 am

    “´mericans want their happy ending pacifier, simple as that.”

    Movies (and theatre) are, most importantly entertainment, not art.

    People generally do not need to be reminded that most of life is tedious and boring, or that there are no happy endings just a kind of dull tragic ending.

    They experience that everyday.

    Shakespeare understood this. He put plenty of entertainment in everything for all levels of society, the high and the low born.

    If something is going to be a tragedy, it must be epic in scale. He didn’t write the tragedy of two peasant lovers in Romeo and Juliet, it was a conflict between two rich houses. It is not hamelt the pig herder that has his father murdered by his uncle, but hamlet the prince.

    There is no reason to pay for something you get everyday for free.

    So the “reality” of the characters in reunion is just part of it, the other elements required is humor (if the mundane can be made funny it isn’t so bad anymore) and the characters have to be appealing in some way to the audience (not necessarily likable).

    all of this applies to the first American movie. The characters are recognizable as people we know or knew in high school and their situations are recognizable and made humorous (which makes people see their own problems less as a burden and more as something the at least see the humor of), and the understanding nerdy father figure is in a peculiar way and idealized version of a father people wish they had, which is why his character is popular.

    He doesn’t freak out when he catches his son with the pie. He provides cover. He is calm, he understands better better than you think he would at first glance.

    All these elements make it popular

  5. October 10, 2012 at 6:28 am

    AD, you should read these comments by Mark Minter on my blog; they pretty much sum up the end-game of what you’re describing here:



    Will do so. Thanks.

  6. Ted
    October 11, 2012 at 9:08 am

    Interesting. I saw the first 2 and never gave them much thought. I neither wished I could engage in their behavior when I was their age, nor did I judge them harshly. I saw it as just a movie. But, the career setbacks of the characters in Reunion do give one a moment to pause and think.

    I have an uncle who started his own business when he was 50 – kind of a late age. With hard work he has been through boom and bust, he has kept it going for 15 years. He has no desire to retire, because although he won’t admit it, that would mean he would be stuck in the house with my aunt – doing boring as hell domestic shit. The other day, she mentioned some weekends that she would like for him to accompany her to something, and he said that he would be out of town on work. She went nuts – complaining that he spent all his time working. I was watching this, and thought, “What is wrong with you?” They live in a nice suburb, he gave his daughter and son-in law a high five figure gift for a new home in an even nicer suburb – and she is losing it over a weekend or two.

    She, and many women I know, have trouble managing a solitary existence. As a never-married man, I can get lonely at times, but I do not freak out if I am alone. Married, upper class women fill up their free time with useless activities (book club, garden parties, wedding planning, etc) because there is a man taking care of the essentials. When they complain they are busy, woe unto the man who points out they could stop doing such useless activities, and nothing would happen.

    Indeed, for any man who sometimes gets lonely for female companionship, just watch a spoiled woman lose it on her husband over some bullshit. Then, thank a higher power that you do not have to deal with such nonsense, and jack yourself off to sleep.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: