Home > Critical Thinking, Current Affairs, Dystopia, Musings, Reason, Secular Religions, Skepticism > Why Gun Control Is A Non-Starter in the USA

Why Gun Control Is A Non-Starter in the USA

Eliminating private gun ownership in the USA has been a perpetual wet-dream of leftist totalitarians for some time now. These scumbags try to use every gun-related incident, however minor or not so minor, to push that dream. Why has it not worked?

The short answer to that question is- for all their faults, most gun-owning americans recognize that gun-control is not about reducing deaths by guns. It is about pulling off a peculiar type of power grab which any sane person would rightfully resent and resist.

So what do I mean by ‘gun control is not about reducing death by guns’?

Let me explain.. You might have heard or read apologists and stooges for the ‘gun control’ movement use any and every media forum to push their ’cause’ under the guise of reducing ‘harm’ by guns. While I am a strong supporter of reducing harm in many other areas, from legalizing drugs and prostitution, the case for reducing ‘harm’ by banning guns strikes me as rather irrational.

Firstly- banning or restricting anything does not reduce the ‘harm’ from it.

If that were not so, banning alcohol production should have reduced the harm caused by it- however the failed experiment with alcohol prohibition during the 1920s suggests otherwise. Prohibition merely destroyed a thriving industrial sector and funneled its revenues into sub-standard and expensive stuff which supported the biggest expansion of organised crime in the history of the USA. I would go so far as to say that the Mafia and (largely corrupt) cops of that era were the principal beneficiary of alcohol prohibition. It did not reduce crime nor the total number of deaths from alcohol consumption. It also made ‘law-breakers’ out of a significant percentage of the american population thereby reducing their respect for other laws passed and enforced by the system. The ‘war on drugs’ has also been a similar failure, though some older white people still support it because it preferentially destroyed the lives of black men. Today it is easier to buy a joint, a few lines of cocaine or vicodin pills than it is to buy a bottle of vodka- especially if you are “underage”. Moreover, much of the early criminality associated with drug trafficking has burnt out to the point that it is a pretty mature and established industry in the USA.

Secondly- people will pay for something that they need.

While advertising can help sell useless crap for some time, the long-term demand for any product is largely determined by real needs. While ‘beanie babies’ were at once highly collectible items, they are no longer so. However people still fill up their cars with about the same amount of gasoline they used to in the mid-1990s. While guns are not as essential as gasoline for cars, they are certainly far more useful than stuffed toys. Furthermore they require a minimal amount of maintenance and usage unlike many other products. Guns that were made many decades ago are still functional, and will be so for decades more. The technology to make decent quality guns is also available all over the world and is hard to separate from normal everyday usage of such technology. It therefore goes without saying that any legal ban or restriction on guns in the USA might not actually affect the ability to acquire guns by those who need it and don’t care about being a law-abiding slave.. I mean “citizen”.

Thirdly- ‘gun control’ does not address the real issues behind gun violence in the USA.

The scam of ‘gun control’ does not address the real and rather unpleasant reasons behind the uniquely high rates of gun-related homicide in america. These disingenuous fucktards pushing for ‘gun control’ don’t seem to care about what makes people in the USA so willing to kill other people. While bad and failed policies such as continuing the failed ‘war on drugs’ and excessive rates of incarceration and dehumanization of non-whites is part of the problem- the root goes much deeper. It concerns how Americans see and treat each others, regardless of race or class.

The USA combines the worst elements of two different types of dytopias. On one hand, it has levels of socio-economic inequality and a general disregard for the lives of other people that approaches (or exceeds) that seen in third-world banana republics. On the other hand, it has levels of social atomization similar to scandinavian countries. It is this combination of dysfunctions that creates a uniquely toxic mix.

The average poor and battered person in your typical high-inequality country (Brazil, Mexico, India or China) can expect a lot of assistance and support from their family and friends. The family and peer support available in such systems in those countries often mitigates the suffering inflicted by the larger system and prevents most people from going off track or becoming highly misanthropic. Atomized societies such as your typical west-european country handle the same basic problem through generous social welfare programs, excellent subsidized healthcare, excellent public infrastructure, subsidized education and housing etc.

Both types of societies try to stop people from reaching a point where they lose all hope in, and connections, to the society at large.

The american system is unique in that has very high levels of inequality without any mechanisms (social or state funded) to protect vulnerable people. Americans, especially whites, take great pleasure in the sufferings of even poorer and vulnerable people. Being a ‘winner’ in american society is largely determined by who you are born to rather than your actual capabilities or willingness to work hard, play by the rules etc.

But if that is the case- why didn’t things go to hell a hundred, or even fifty, years ago?

Here is why.. The long and almost continuous economic expansion of the USA since its beginning prevented the buildup of excessive socio-economic pressure for almost two centuries. While the overall system was grossly unfair, the economic expansion created enough new opportunities to occupy and even reward the disgruntled. People started to believe that a brighter future was around the corner- if they only waited a bit longer. This safety valve also allowed the USA to ignore the needs of its most vulnerable citizens in a manner that the UK, Germany or Russia could not get away with.

The american economic expansion slowed in the 1970s and stopped by the mid-1980s. Most economic growth since then has been largely appropriated by the top 1% of american society leaving the rest to fend for themselves. While it was initially possible to keep people somewhat happy and content by blowing ever larger economic bubbles, that option appears to have reached its end. Then there is the issue of people having fewer or no kids and a concurrent fall in the numbers of those who move to the USA. A substantial reduction in the number and percentages of new suckers combined with the acceleration of income concentration at the top end of society without the safety valve of a new frontier (real or imagined) has unmasked the underlying problems with the american way of doing things.

The screwing of average americans was once restricted to blacks, visible minorities and a few poor whites. Beginning in the 1980s, blue-collar whites joined that list and that is why workplace shootings started in that decade. Initially White-collared morons thought they were insulated from these changes because of their ‘education’ and for a while it appeared to be the case. However that illusion has been slowly eroded over the course of the last 10-12 years. It is therefore no surprise that the younger members of the white-collared group are increasingly taking out their frustrations and disenchantment in the easiest way they can. We should also not forget that prostitution in the USA is too expensive and subject to a lot of arbritrary law enforcement- unlike almost every other developed country.

A lot of young, smart and capable men have realized that they no trustworthy and dependable relationships or friendships, no pleasurable physical contact (even paid), no reciprocal social contract and no ‘better’ future to look forward to in the current setup. Most stop playing the old game, usually after a series of bad experiences, and slowly disengage from an increasingly ubalanced and unstable society. Some adopt alternate life trajectories (the rise of ‘game’, MGTOW etc) rather than go down an obviously fruitless path. A minority decide to kill a few other people before killing themselves.

Guns are just the most easily available means to kill other people in the USA. Banning or restricting them will just make those who want to kill use other methods- some of which might cause a far higher body count per incident than semi-auto guns.

What do you think? Comments?

  1. December 27, 2012 at 2:04 pm

    Very good post, especially the thoughts on economic expansion and social stability.

  2. Wilson
    December 27, 2012 at 2:19 pm

    Shouldn’t the title be “Why Gun Control is an Inevitability in the USA”, though?

    They will try but it won’t matter- one way or the other.

  3. infowarrior1
    December 27, 2012 at 4:35 pm

    Or get them illegally because the black market responds to demand.

    Mexico is a very good example of ‘strict’ gun-control laws failing because of the easy availability of “illegal” guns.

  4. December 27, 2012 at 8:19 pm

    Reblogged this on oogenhand and commented:
    Powerful analysis of USA society.

  5. December 27, 2012 at 8:20 pm


    banning guns is like banning porn, you of all creepsters should know that….


  6. webe
    December 28, 2012 at 12:50 pm

    The number of guns already out there makes any type of gun control a moot point.
    Still, the correlation between the number of guns and the number of murders cannot be ignored — at least a portion of murders would result in a different type of drama if there wasn’t a gun at hand.
    The main point, that in the American winner take all society there are a lot (and growing number) of nothing to lose men that “lose it”.

  7. P Ray
    December 28, 2012 at 5:31 pm

    More gun control is the wrong way to do things. Chris Rock knows what’s up:

  8. doclove
    December 31, 2012 at 5:13 pm

    Other than you comments about Whites being such nasty racists in my perception, you are quite correct in that it combines the atomization without the government benefits like Scandinavia or Germany, and the lack of familial and friendship support like China or Brazil. However, you failed to point out diversity plus proximity equals war and murder and death; and, I wish this weren’t so. Scandinavia and Germany will fall and become more violent as they become more Muslim, Southwest Asian, Central Asian and African is my prediction. Afghanistan and Pakistan and Iraq are prime examples and so is India. The other races are at least as racist as the Whites and are in my estimation worse racists than the Whites. Look at their behavior.

    • doclove
      January 1, 2013 at 11:30 am

      The other reason Scandinavia and Germany will fall is that they too will run out of money and become more like Greece. Diversity will only hasten and worsen the fall. Japan and South Korea will be in better position despite similar problems such as low birthrates as in Scandinavia and Germany because they were more restrictive with their immigration policies. Neither South Korea nor Japan have as many government benefits given directly to the people, but government aid is given to the corporations who are encouraged to benefit the people in these 1st world East Asian countries. People’s declining fortunes leads to unrest, but diversity plus proximity makes a bad situation worse. I know you’re South Asian. why are you in the West specificly the USA and not a South Asian nation such as India? The answer is same reason as many other non-White people because it is better in the West and the USA for the time overall if not in absolute terms for the time being. Do you really think that these other non-White countries people would treat the Whites or anyone else not of their race, not of their ethnicity and/or not of their citizenship as well as these White countries have treated others not of theirs? The answer is certainly not. Believe me when I say I know Whites haven’t always been the best towards others, but others are just as bad if not worse. Stop deluding yourself. In this world, good is more often than not punished and evil rewarded.

    • Firepower
      January 6, 2013 at 4:43 pm

      Take away jobs from white kids and their future – then tax their misery. ADD a mountain of GUNS to ADHD-addled gamers completely de-sensitized to animated bloodshed – toss in a dose of hopelessness while watching The Sitch make millions and light.

      Chris Rock is a monkey living far above it all in a Hollywood Hills mansion – throwing turds at the little people that mut live near his “peeps” – coloreds.

  9. Firepower
    January 1, 2013 at 5:13 pm

    The Left does NOT want to
    Ban Guns
    To lower crime – or school shootings.

    Thus, they do not solely rely upon playing the sympathy-for-the-crime-victims card.

    • LOL
      January 7, 2013 at 7:45 pm

      Wow, how sad, this dude Firepower is once again just talking to himself and getting ignored. Here, I’ll give you some attention:

      Shut the fuck up, cum guzzler. Preferably by killing yourself. Happy now?

  10. survivingincel
    January 2, 2013 at 8:48 am

    well said. Gun violence is merely the result of a degenerating, sick culture that rewards the wicked and punish the righteous. Too many people are fed shit and expect to like it.

  1. July 26, 2015 at 10:14 pm
  2. August 26, 2017 at 4:54 pm
  3. February 22, 2018 at 6:17 pm
  4. April 9, 2019 at 5:24 pm
  5. August 3, 2019 at 10:33 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: