A Morbid and Hilarious Make Work Idea

While writing a couple of longish posts, I took a break and completed one of my older short posts. This one is about a morbid but hilarious make work scheme that is very feasible.

What if we paid young people (especially non-whites) to dig up and destroy the graves of dead old white people?

Now some of you might see this as an attempt to desecrate the graves of dead old white people, but I don’t. Desecration involves damaging something to such an extent that it cannot serve its previous function, yet is still recognizable as such. So breaking gravestones, digging out corpses and piling them up in the center of the graveyard would be desecration. What I am proposing is however far more thorough.

The scheme starts with paying people to destroy gravestones and disposing them in a manner that no future archaeologist could piece back together. Then the workers will dig out the corpses of dead old white people and ‘process’ them such that they are unrecognizable at organic remains- perhaps with high temperature incineration. The next step involves digging and refilling the whole graveyard (disrupting the soil) to remove all tell-tale signs of its previous history. The area can then be planted with vegetation to make it contiguous with the surroundings. As you can see, the scheme involves much more than simple desecration which is fast and not that labor intensive. In contrast, the “grave annihilation” scheme is slow, methodical, thorough and labor intensive.

First you have to locate all of the graveyards and come up with the best plan of action for each class of graveyards. Some gravestones, mini-mausoleums and grave ornaments might be harder to destroy beyond recognition than others. Then there is the logistics of transporting the fragments for disposal.

While digging up corpses is easy, processing them requires transportation to sites with high temperature incinerators. Then there is the issue of quality control, as all of this effort would be for naught if the corpses cannot be reliably processed to a form unrecognizable as human remains. We also cannot ignore the logistics and planning involved in proper disposal of the residual solid end-products of the process.

Proper land reclamation requires a considerable amount of surveying, planning and execution. Removing all traces of its previous usage will involve a lot of digging of the whole area, removal and disposal of some soil that may contain identifying artifacts, transportation of equivalent soil from adjacent areas, putting back the soil layers such that they are contiguous with the adjacent areas and then planting vegetation that will blend with the surroundings.

Then there is the issue of removing all official records of the existence of these people from history. It will require a lot of manpower to go through all of the archives and records to ensure the removal of all official evidence of their existence from history. It will however not be necessary to rewrite history, as nobody will care about their existence (or non-existence) after a few years.

What do you think? Comments?

  1. P Ray
    February 28, 2013 at 6:35 pm

    Plant among them some people who propagate the idea (with appropriate brackets for listeners to assume the worst):
    We had to break and destroy them. Because they would have spread (the plague) and were coming back (from the dead).
    And why not? Some people are already having zombie gatherings anyway …

  2. February 28, 2013 at 7:37 pm


    this post is so bad GL Piggy coulda written it….

  3. March 1, 2013 at 5:45 am

    But Advipoopsonus, isn’t “make-work” one of the “great ideas” of your favorite dead white eCONomist John Maynard Keynes, whose dead white cock you enjoy fellating?

    seekerblog .com/2008/01/28/keynes-upside-down-economics

    http://www.cato .org/blog/making-work-destroying-wealth

    I am actually quite OK with the idea of paying younger non-whites to systemically erase all evidence for the existence of dead old white people.

  4. G. Bush
    March 1, 2013 at 7:48 am

    You would have to teach them to use a shovel. Then you would find they were to lazy to dig.

  5. March 1, 2013 at 10:50 pm
  6. John Rambo
    March 4, 2013 at 12:09 pm

    Paul Elam, A Voice for Men- the biggest conjob in the MRA and disinfo agent


    A short commentary on MRA leaders

    The so called “Leaders” of the MRA area are lying to you all. They are telling you that governments make legislation that you HAVE to obey and that they can FORCE you to obey using the police FORCE. This is a lie. They know it is a lie. And they are telling you lies that they know are lies.

    The TRUTH is that legislation is NOT LAW and you do not have to obey ANY legislation. Here are links to videos that go into this in detail. This is not a new idea. Many people KNOW that legislation is not law and have been telling you so for a long time.

    The excuse offered is usually “well the guvment can hurt you if you do not obey” is just that. An excuse. The only reason that guvments do hurt men who do not obey is because men have TOLERATED these crimes and not formed new courts to put criminals in guvment on trial. Men only have themselves to blame.

  7. SS
    December 4, 2013 at 7:27 pm

    Jesus Christ…What’s your beef with whitey?

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: