Was Elliot Rodger a Misogynist?

One week ago, a rather unusual murder spree occurred in Isla Vista, California. The person who carried it out, Elliot Rodger, as well as six others died that day and many more were injured. For reasons that I will go into in more detail later, this story grabbed the attention of national and international media. It has also caused quite a stir in social media and the blogosphere. Much has been written about this incident and Elliot Rodger from a number of often mutually contradictory viewpoints. At this time, I have no interest in listing all of them- suffice to say that pretty much every interest group and ideology is using this incident to further their agenda. This incident has however raised many interesting questions, and based on a search of google news and twitter, it appears that one of them is dominating the public conversation about Elliot Rodger and the Isla Vista killings.

Was Elliot Rodger a Misogynist?

Now many women, especially those in media, seem to have made up their mind about his question- regardless of the rather obvious fact that he killed 4 men and 2 women. I, however, am going to take a methodical approach to this question and try to answer it with the available evidence.

As of today, we have three main sources of evidence about what was going on in Elliot’s mind. They are-

1] His 141 page manifesto (downloaded within minutes of it appearing on scribd.com).
2] His YouTube video (again, downloaded within minutes of his name becoming public).
3] Archived postings on a few message boards.

Of these three, the first two are the most useful as they are the most extensive. With that in mind, let us first define the concept of misogyny. While many people now define misogyny in a very broad and nebulous manner to encompass almost everything they want to, the original and more compact definition is more illuminating.

Misogyny = hatred, dislike or mistrust of women.

With this in mind I decided to perform a text string search of Elliot’s manifesto for words such as “hate”, “hatred”, “dislike”, “mistrust”, distrust” and a number of synonyms for those words such as “bitter”, “bitterness”, “contempt”, “disgust”, “detest”, “envy”, “fear”, “loathing” “loathe” and “revulsion”. I wanted to find out the context of his use of those words.

Here are the results (for the manifesto).

“hate” = uncomfortable socks, sitting cross-legged, Maddy Humpreys, Soumaya, Soumaya, attending Bay Laurel elementary school, going to summer camp, Matt Bordier, Soumaya, skateboarder kids, skateboarder kids, grade 6 classmates, Oren Aks, Lucky Radley, Soumaya, finding about sex, his father being away, Monette Moio, all tween girls in his playcircle, Soumaya, everyone in grade 9, Soumaya, Crespi school, Jesse, going to summer camp, cruel girls, his father’s house, Leo Bubenheim, Polina Bubenheim, Leo Bubenheim, telling where his mother lived, injustices of the world, Soumaya, the world, Addison, Addison, Addison, his father and Soumaya, everyone without anxiety, sexual lives of other people, life, his classmates, Chance (black guy), popular-boy types, people asking him why he was so quiet, a couple at the camino real marketplace, Angel (guy), others realizing how pathetic his life was, others realizing how pathetic his life was, Spencer, guys with beautiful girlfriends, university history class, Vincent, Brittany story’s boyfriend, kids born into wealth, Gary Ross, Gary Ross’s friends, Alexander Ludwig, fraternity jocks, Spencer, being the shameful grandson, obnoxious and boisterous men, girls who liked such men, feeling trapped and lost, guys at a party, the world, Samuel, sorority girls at UCSB.

Did you notice something odd about that list? The major targets of his hate are men who are sexually successful with women and his step-mother, Soumaya. The closest he comes to saying that he hates women are when he talks about girls (or women) who teased and/or ignored him. Curiously, he also mentions several times that he knew or felt that girls hated him. Moving on..

“hatred” = Riley Anapol, Lucky Radley, skateboarding, boys around him at fourteen years of age, Leo Bubenheim, people with a sexual life, people who have sex, people who have sex, seeing young couples, seeing young couples, four thugs who egged him, towards the world, towards life, towards the world and society, Addison, jocks with hot girlfriends, Leo Bubenheim, online people who brag about their girlfriends, towards the world, a young couple, towards the world, a young couple, a guy with a hot girlfriend, Alexander Ludwig, everyone especially women, over not finding a girlfriend, towards all women, behavior of women around him, women, women attracted to other men, female gender, women rejecting him, spoiled and rich USC girls, Samuel, all those women who rejected him.

While he now talks a bit about hating women- he is actually quite precise about what type of woman he hates. Moreover he still hates men who are sexually successful with women far more than he hates women. Also note that he often talks about the hatred towards the rest of the world brewing inside him. My point is that, so far we have not seen any evidence that he hated women (as a group) more than the men who were sexually successful with them. Moving on further..

“dislike” = Keaton Webber, change to his life, staying at his father’s house, being at his father’s house, going to Morocco, low-class students, a teacher, some hotel.

What about girls or women? Isn’t it odd that he spends more time talking about his dislike at staying at his father’s house.. Anyway, let us go to the next word string.

“mistrust” = 0 hits

“bitter” or “bitterness” = irony of his first american friend being a girl, growing up, growing up, not being popular, being teased, WoW players, his father losing money, not meeting women, Addison, struggle against other men, hatred towards the world, at being lonely, online argument, envy of rich kids, not being able to bring a date, Lemelson’s Christmas party, Jazz (guy), Addison, talking to his father’s friends.

Well, not much about girls or women. But he sure hated this Addison guy- he is almost all of the word association lists. Anyhoo. on to the next word string.

“contempt” = Vincent, some couple.

“disgust” = cool kids, Addison, boisterous jocks, girls who like boisterous jocks, humanity.

Addison makes an appearance in another word list. He also talks about how girls probably find him disgusting. and onwards we go..

“detest” = 0 hits.

“envy” = dominate his life, Matt Bordier, Robert Morgan, Julian, Neil Davis, other boys at school when he was 14 years old, Leo Bubenheim, Jeffrey, Leo Bubenheim, Max, anyone with a sex life, Addison, Leo Bubenheim, jock with pretty girlfriend, anybody with a sex life, teenage couples, Julian Ritz-Barr, Julian Ritz-Barr, Vincent, Jazz, jazz, Philip and Addison,

I don’t see any girl or woman in that list.. but I can see Addison.. again! Holy shit.. this guy must be some prick.

“fear” = play, school, cool kids, middle school, middle school, middle school, seeing pictures of naked girls for the first time, of humiliation, around two girls, of girls, of girls, of girls, of getting nervous, never being able to drive, life in Santa Barbara, living independently, never being able to join in on the fun, of couple he threw coffee at, his inability to attract women, going to Isla Vista without friends, of a woman’s judgement, that some one might find out about his plan, fear of not winning the lottery, fear of being caught, lottery result, death but less than living like that, might get into trouble, operation on his ankle, starting college still crippled, of killing his father, of committing mass murder, that cops might discover his plan, cops showing up again.

So he was afraid of women, rather than wanting them to be afraid of him. Isn’t that a bid odd for a highly misogynistic killer. Oh well.. moving on

“loathing” and “loathe” = himself.

“revulsion” = working hard each day for twenty years to make a million or two.

So, there you have it! There is not much in his manifesto to suggest that he hated, disliked or mistrusted women- in any context other than those who rejected him and were having sex with boisterous and popular guys. Also, his hatred for women is far more individual than his hatred of other men. Perhaps more importantly, he has far higher levels of hatred for all those men who are sexually successful with women. If anything, his manifesto suggests that Elliot was misandrist, not misogynist. But who care about that..

Since this post is already almost 1500 words long, it is best to not add to it. Therefore, I will discuss his videos in an upcoming post.

What do you think? Comments?

  1. May 30, 2014 at 5:39 pm

    As RooshV stated on ROK, Rodger was the first (male), feminist mass murderer. Plus, he listed the 10 reasons why he was just like a feminist. In addition to that, this is what happens when white male ego gets deflated. And this happens a month after Donald Sterling’s ego failed him.

    • j5
      June 1, 2014 at 4:11 pm

      Roosh is wrong, Rodger wasn’t the first mass murderer for his hatred of women. I read somewhere from another pua who said that usually…the men are the ones that get in the way (cockblock) of other men and want the other man to fail and women in general are usually rooting for the men, so I can see why he would be jealous of other men with gorgeous women. Not to sympathize with this psychotic murder, but I know what he’s talking about. I had a very confident friend who just uses people and he had very hot girlfriend. I don’t know if they’re still together now but sometimes I just wonder what some hot women see in these kind of guys though. He was nothing but trouble for her, she always ended up having to clean up or pick him up in jail.

      • June 1, 2014 at 5:07 pm

        Correction: the first male FEMINIST mass murderer. Rodger had had a lot with feminists and Roosh offered 10 reasons why in his Return Of Kings article.

  2. May 30, 2014 at 5:45 pm

    A thorough, methodical analysis. People are out of control right now, it’s nice to see that you’re maintaining an empirical approach.

  3. May 30, 2014 at 6:05 pm

    oh, ov course he was a misogynist….

    your just as delusioned as this asshat!!!

    http://stonerwithaboner.wordpress.com/2014/05/30/tasteless-but-funny-nonetheless/

  4. Great Grimoires for Masons
    May 30, 2014 at 10:00 pm

    His 141 page manifesto: http://abclocal.go.com/three/kabc/kabc/My-Twisted-World.pdf

    The ultimate evil behind sexuality is the human female. They are the main instigators of sex. They control which men get it and which men don’t. Women are flawed creatures, and my mistreatment at their hands has made me realize this sad truth. There is something very twisted and wrong with the way their brains are wired. They think like beasts, and in truth, they are beasts. Women are incapable of having morals or thinking rationally. They are completely controlled by their depraved emotions and vile sexual impulses. Because of this, the men who do get to experience the pleasures of sex and the privilege of breeding are the men who women are sexually attracted to… the stupid, degenerate, obnoxious men. I have observed this all my life. The most beautiful of women choose to mate with the most brutal of men, instead of magnificent gentlemen like myself.

    Women should not have the right to choose who to mate and breed with. That decision should be made for them by rational men of intelligence. If women continue to have rights, they will only hinder the advancement of the human race by breeding with degenerate men and creating stupid, degenerate offspring. This will cause humanity to become even more depraved with each generation. Women have more power in human society than they deserve, all because of sex. There is no creature more evil and depraved than the human female.

    Women are like a plague. They don’t deserve to have any rights. Their wickedness must be contained in order prevent future generations from falling to degeneracy. Women are vicious, evil, barbaric animals, and they need to be treated as such.

    In fully realizing these truths about the world, I have created the ultimate and perfect ideology of how a fair and pure world would work. In an ideal world, sexuality would not exist. It must be outlawed. In a world without sex, humanity will be pure and civilized. Men will grow up healthily, without having to worry about such a barbaric act. All men will grow up fair and equal, because no man will be able to experience the pleasures of sex while others are denied it. The human race will evolve to an entirely new level of civilization, completely devoid of all the impurity and degeneracy that exists today.

    In order to completely abolish sex, women themselves would have to be abolished. All women must be quarantined like the plague they are, so that they can be used in a manner that actually benefits a civilized society. In order carry this out, there must exist a new and powerful type of government, under the control of one divine ruler, such as myself. The ruler that establishes this new order would have complete control over every aspect of society, in order to direct it towards a good and pure place. At the disposal of this government, there needs to be a highly trained army of fanatically loyal troops, in order to enforce such revolutionary laws.

    The first strike against women will be to quarantine all of them in concentration camps. At these camps, the vast majority of the female population will be deliberately starved to death. That would be an efficient and fitting way to kill them all off. I would take great pleasure and satisfaction in condemning every single woman on earth to starve to death. I would have an enormous tower built just for myself, where I can oversee the entire concentration camp and gleefully watch them all die. If I can’t have them, no one will, I’d imagine thinking to myself as I oversee this. Women represent everything that is unfair with this world, and in order to make the world a fair place, they must all be eradicated.

    A few women would be spared, however, for the sake of reproduction. These women would be kept and bred in secret labs. There, they will be artificially inseminated with sperm samples in order to produce offspring. Their depraved nature will slowly be bred out of them in time.

    Future generations of men would be oblivious to these remaining women’s existence, and that is for the best. If a man grows up without knowing of the existence of women, there will be no desire for sex. Sexuality will completely cease to exist. Love will cease to exist. There will no longer be any imprint of such concepts in the human psyche. It is the only way to purify the world.

    In such a pure world, the man’s mind can develop to greater heights than ever before. Future generations will live their lives free of having to worry about the barbarity of sex and women, which will enable them to expand their intelligence and advance the human race to a state of perfect civilization.

    It is such a shameful pity that my ideal world cannot be created. I realized long ago that there is no way I could possibly rise to such a level of power in my lifetime, with the way the world is now. Such a thing will never become a reality for me, but it did give me something to fantasize about as I burned with hatred towards all women for rejecting me throughout the years. This whole viewpoint and ideology of abolishing sex stems from being deprived of it all my life. If I cannot have it, I will do everything I can to DESTROY IT.

    lollzolzlolzlolzolll….

    • masculineffort
      May 30, 2014 at 11:21 pm

      A new communist ideology must focus on equal sex for all. Monetary equality is not good enough without sexual equality because then there will be no way for ugly nerds to compete with handsome muscle bound men. I will take the communists seriously only once they start talking about how they are going to bring about sexual equality. Hot models should be forced to have sex with ugly losers and handsome men should be forced to have sex with Fugly bitches. Now that’s communism.

    • webe
      May 31, 2014 at 4:16 am

      He does make a few good points, actually. In many societies the family arranges marriages — for them it would be absurd to leave this to the romantic whims of a young woman. In Islamic societies it is axiomatic that women cannot be trusted as witnesses and that they are unfit to take important decisions. Many church fathers and exponents of monastic traditions espoused similar thoughts. The kingdom of heaven would come when mankind finally got over sex, and they were the vanguard.
      Many in the vanguard blamed women themselves for awaking lust in them (especially the voluptuous ones). The parents of St Thomas tried to get him to see reason by arranging for prostitutes to visit him. St Jerome (translated the Vulgate) complained that after years of fasting in the desert, he had only to close his eyes for an instant and bevies of dancing girls would appear before his mind’s eye. I mean, what could be more humiliating than to improve yourself with years of study and discipline and then be stuck in a stupid game where you are at best the equal of other morons, all to wring a few tears from “the eye that weeps best when best pleased.”
      So not everything he says is crazy. But then again, 99% of what Hitler said wasn’t crazy either. The remaining 1% is pretty important, though.

      • hoipolloi
        June 1, 2014 at 2:56 pm

        <>

        Insightful statement. Men are wired for this. No use shaming them. Thanks.

      • hoipolloi
        June 1, 2014 at 2:59 pm

        “St Jerome (translated the Vulgate) complained that after years of fasting in the desert, he had only to close his eyes for an instant and bevies of dancing girls would appear before his mind’s eye. I mean, what could be more humiliating than to improve yourself with years of study and discipline and then be stuck in a stupid game where you are at best the equal of other morons, all to wring a few tears from “the eye that weeps best when best pleased.”[metaphor for vagina]”

        Insightful statement. Men are wired for this. No use shaming them. Thanks.

        PS: Some problem with earlier posting

      • masculineffort
        June 1, 2014 at 6:16 pm

        Having grown up and currently living in a society where arranged marriage is the norm and also having lived in the U.S. for some time, I think i am qualified to make a few statements here.

        Believe me, you guys would hate a society where arranged marriage was the norm. The women make no effort to look good and they are uniformly plain if not downright ugly. There is no joy, nothing to look forward to, as who the hell works hard so he can marry a plain looking chick? So the solution you are offering is no solution at all. Chill!

      • P Ray
        July 20, 2014 at 9:14 pm

        Believe me, you guys would hate a society where arranged marriage was the norm. The women make no effort to look good and they are uniformly plain if not downright ugly. There is no joy, nothing to look forward to, as who the hell works hard so he can marry a plain looking chick? So the solution you are offering is no solution at all. Chill!
        Many of those societies with arranged marriages also have prostitution, e.g. India, Israel, China, America (yup).

        as who the hell works hard so he can marry a plain looking chick
        Feminists will tell you that you are doing so because you “respect women” and are a “nice guy”.
        And if she cheats on you, gets you to raise someone else’s child, or divorces you and takes half “since you are a beneficiary of patriarchy, you have to pay for the poor defenceless women(who have a legal right to bear arms)”

  5. masculineffort
    May 30, 2014 at 11:16 pm

    Hmm, This writing is not as per your usual style on matters such as these. Oh, well! There is still part 2.

  6. webe
    May 31, 2014 at 4:31 am

    Entering the realm of discourse in which words like misogynist and misanthrope are bandied about sort of means you’ve checked in reason at the door. Are gays misogynists? Have you ever heard some gay men discuss women’s tender bits? Are philanthropists really admirable people for donating the money they have ripped off their workers to a library? Are they true buddies with their peers in society? Are women that dig men philanderers? Would philandrist then be the superlative? Does the idea of man-hating arouse any indignation in people, or just laughter and amusement? Would it be more accurate to designate horny hetero men the ultimate philogynists? Should we not appoint the horniest of men to an official council that watches over women’s best interests?

  7. blurkel
    May 31, 2014 at 7:39 am

    Even as Rodger ranted about women, based on the samples offered, he hated men more. The fact that he wanted to kill women off (thus hurting also the PUAs and sexually successful men he also detested) shows that he was a misanthrope and not a misogynist. Yes, he hated women. He also hated that he couldn’t be like the men he hated, and thus added them to his list for harm. That alone rebuffs the idea that Rodger was a misogynist.

    But the MSM isn’t known for its intellect and accuracy, is it? They are but hyping the scandal to attract the distaff reader which keeps them in business.

  8. A.
  9. P Ray
    May 31, 2014 at 3:36 pm

    I don’t see any girl or woman in that list.. but I can see Addison.. again! Holy shit.. this guy must be some prick.
    Many people are scared of their name turning up in the manifesto because it would make their actions of either being bubbly airheads who screw things up or playful jocks who cockblock …
    be seen to be a charade and the truth is that they’re asshats.

    That’s why there is so much damage control, some of the psychopaths are getting scared.

  10. Washington
    May 31, 2014 at 9:45 pm

    This is Addison Altendorf the one in question: plus.google.com/115028945243240054771/photos, you can judge from the looks. Here is Soumaya Akaaboune his stepmother : http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0015033, she looks like your typical Moroccan bitch and snake.
    No one noticed that Elliot was not good looking in his childhood and that he was short. These were the main reasons why he was mistreated by everyone. It’s only later in life that he became better looking.
    He was neither an autistic nor a psychopath and his manifesto is a clear proof. The manospherians are reacting by saying that he was a psycho or a feminist or whatever, but this is normal because Elliot reminds Roosh and others of themselves.

  11. Washington
    May 31, 2014 at 9:56 pm

    Yeah and manospherians are jumping to say that he is narcissist and wrongly thinking that he is entitled to have a girl – this coming from the mouth of pussy chasers. How couldn’t he felt to be entitled if everybody including his grandmother used to ask him if he had a girlfriend?

  12. Washington
  13. The Plague Doctor
    May 31, 2014 at 10:51 pm

    @Washington,

    I did not know you could tell someone is evil, just by looking at their face.

    Eliott Rodger clearly had Narcissistic Personality Disorder, just like Advocatus Diaboli. It is easy to recognise in Eliott, but it took me a while to recognize it in AD, even though I had extensive previous experience dealing with someone who had NPD. This is a road to nowhere, and the sooner AD realizes this the better for him. This is no laughing matter, but unfortunately, I believe that NPD is incurable, so of course AD will completely dismiss what I have to say.

    * Feels grandiose and self-important (e.g., exaggerates accomplishments, talents, skills, contacts, and personality traits to the point of lying, demands to be recognised as superior without commensurate achievements);
    * Is obsessed with fantasies of unlimited success, fame, fearsome power or omnipotence, unequalled brilliance (the cerebral narcissist), bodily beauty or sexual performance (the somatic narcissist), or ideal, everlasting, all-conquering love or passion;
    * Firmly convinced that he or she is unique and, being special, can only be understood by, should only be treated by, or associate with, other special or unique, or high-status people (or institutions);
    * Requires excessive admiration, adulation, attention and affirmation – or, failing that, wishes to be feared and to be notorious (Narcissistic Supply);
    * Feels entitled. Demands automatic and full compliance with his or her unreasonable expectations for special and favourable priority treatment;
    * Is “interpersonally exploitative”, i.e., uses others to achieve his or her own ends;
    * Devoid of empathy. Is unable or unwilling to identify with, acknowledge, or accept the feelings, needs, preferences, priorities, and choices of others;
    * Constantly envious of others and seeks to hurt or destroy the objects of his or her frustration. Suffers from persecutory (paranoid) delusions as he or she believes that they feel the same about him or her and are likely to act similarly;
    * Behaves arrogantly and haughtily. Feels superior, omnipotent, omniscient, invincible, immune, “above the law”, and omnipresent (magical thinking). Rages when frustrated, contradicted, or confronted by people he or she considers inferior to him or her and unworthy.

    ( from samvak dot tripod dot com/npdglance.html )

    • P Ray
      June 1, 2014 at 9:29 am

      Er, you do know that Sam Vaknin is a self-described narcissist, right?
      You’re giving him his narcissistic supply.

      On the other hand, even people who _are_ accomplished, can get hit with the brush, if enough lies can be cooked up against them.

      And at every stage of life, you may end up talking to people who exhibit one or all of these at a particular moment, WITHOUT being narcissists.

      “The customer is always right” motto, makes out that customers are narcissists, when, for example, some are simply just conniving to hopefully wangle extra favours from a company.
      E.g., they’re simply greedy jerks.

      I’ve overheard some crazy ones myself, like the ones who say “Windows 8 needs to look like Windows 95, you must design it to look like that”

    • joker
      June 1, 2014 at 3:03 pm

      You’re making it sound like the moral of the story is that narcissism gets you lonely and killed… If you mean “narcissism rooted in the eroding feeling of weakness fear” I agree, but in social life, better to have too much ego than too little. Narcissism of “just for the sake of it” style gets you laid and socially thriumphant consistently.

  14. The Plague Doctor
    May 31, 2014 at 11:55 pm

    In his manifesto it becomes clear that Elliot Rodger actually had never talked to a girl, or asked a girl out, in his life.

    “I made a bid to do everything I could to lose my virginity in those few remaining days I had. With a tremendous amount of panic, I wondered what I could possible do. The only thing I could think of was to go out to the common areas of Isla Vista as much as possible. I had to put myself out there, even if it only increased my chances of having sex by one percent. One percent was still better than zero.
    For those crucial twelve days I had left as a teenager, I walked over to the center of Isla Vista every day and sat at one of the tables outside Domino’s Pizza, hoping against hope that a girl would come up and talk to me. Why wouldn’t they? I looked good enough, didn’t I? Or did I not look good enough? Such thoughts flew through my head in frantic waves. For dinner, I always walked over to the healthy restaurant called Silvergreen’s. There were always hot girls there, but none of them deigned to even look at me. On every one of those nights, I walked home alone, with my head down in defeat.
    I made no progress in school either. My geography class had no pretty girls in it, so I had no hope there. I spent a lot of time sitting in the cafeteria area, but all of the beautiful girls I saw intimidated me too much. One time, as I was walking across the huge bridge that connected the two campuses, I passed by a girl I thought was pretty and said “Hi” as we neared each other. She kept on walking and didn’t even have the grace to respond to me. How dare she! That foul bitch. I felt so humiliated that I went to one of the school bathrooms, locked myself in a toilet stall, and cried for an hour.
    On one of my very last days as a teenager, as I was sitting at my usual place at the food court outside Domino’s, I saw a sight that shattered my heart to pieces. A tall, blonde, jock-type guy walked into one of the restaurants, and at his side was one of the sexiest girls I had ever seen. She too was tall and blonde. They were both taller than me, and they kissed each other passionately. They made me feel so inferior and worthless and small. I glared at them with intense hatred as I sat by myself in my lonely misery. I could never have a girl like that. The sight was burned into my memory, and it caused a scar that will haunt me forever. When they walked away, I followed them in my car for a few minutes, and when they entered a less inhabited area I opened my window and splashed my iced tea all over them. It was all I could do at the time, but at least it was something. At least I made some effort to fight back against the injustice. I felt sick with hatred that night. The hatred boiled inside me with burning vitriol.”

    That’s right! This moron considered himself to be so superior that he expected that he could just sit outside and do nothing, and women should just come up to him to ask him to be his girlfriend. LOL! And the only time in his life where he says “Hi” to some girl, he then cries for an hour in the bathroom. And then you have people like Washington, probably another ‘incel’ moron, running to his defence. Unbelievable!

    • Washington
      June 1, 2014 at 7:28 am

      Considering that he was exposed to the idea of equality between men and women since his childhood and considering that girls around him approach alphas, why would a person living in such an environment refrain from thinking that if he makes himself into a gentleman (according to the standard of his parents and grandmother) girls will approach him?

      NPD or “incel moron”, what kind of argument is that?

      • EvilOne
        June 1, 2014 at 7:42 am

        Do westerners REALLY believe that equality tripe? Its pretty trippy and requires a WHOLE lot of cognitive dissonance.

    • P Ray
      June 1, 2014 at 9:31 am

      This moron considered himself to be so superior that he expected that he could just sit outside and do nothing, and women should just come up to him to ask him to be his girlfriend.
      Please enlighten yourself:
      http://www.rooshv.com/you-have-no-idea-how-easy-it-is-for-good-looking-men

  15. Matthew
    June 2, 2014 at 3:52 am

    Admirable and interesting attempt to look at the question analytically, rather than emotionally. Thank you.

  16. September 25, 2014 at 5:32 am

    You know, I just read parts of his manifesto where he admits to hating black guys for dating all those “beautiful blonde” girls he wanted to date, yet they wouldn’t give his crazy ass the time of day. Tariq Nasheed labeled him as a “Donald Sterling Jr.” and he was a prime example of how the ideology of white privilege failed him. So even if he did get some ass, the ideology of white male entitlement would have failed him eventually. Can I sympathize with him? No, even though I could have been like him when I graduated high school because I wasn’t getting none back then. But don’t be surprised if any more events like this occur.

    Here’s a radio show episode from Tariq Nasheed, which exposes the racial element of this incident:

    http://www.tariqradio.com/main/ep31-killer-simps

  1. June 6, 2014 at 4:39 pm
  2. August 9, 2015 at 2:07 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: