Home > Critical Thinking, Current Affairs, Dystopia, Musings, Philosophy sans Sophistry, Reason, Secular Religions, Skepticism, Technology > Fake Moral Outrage by Establishment against Trump will Benefit Him: 1

Fake Moral Outrage by Establishment against Trump will Benefit Him: 1

The previous week, or two, has seen the mainstream media being involved in the coordinated release and promotion of one (or more) audio recording of Trump making some allegedly lewd comments about women. They have also solicited and promoted the personal testimonies of women who have mysteriously remember instances of Trump groping them many years ago. Needless to say, these stories are poorly sourced and look very suspiciously timed. I should also point out more than a few of the accusers have direct, or indirect, links to the Clinton political machine.

It is most peculiar that the mainstream media is promoting these suspiciously timed stories about Trump while simultaneously ignoring the still ongoing releases of John Podesta’s hacked emails by WikiLeaks. As some of you know, the emails released so far by WikiLeaks contain many revelations relevant to the electability of Hillary Clinton in the general election. Also,if you do not know who John Podesta is or need to refresh your memory of him- here is a link about him.

These leaked emails, among other things, highlight the extremely close relationships between her and large corporations and financial institutions- thereby justifying the commonly held belief that she is a tool of corporations and the elite. Other emails from the same leak have shown her disconnectedness and contempt for non-elite americans, especially if they are white and resident in non-coastal states. We now finally have full transcripts of at least three paid speeches given by her to Goldman Sachs (at about 230k per speech) and damaging excerpts from many similar speeches given to other banks and corporations.

Perhaps more disturbingly, these speeches have revealed that she admits (public positions vs private position)that she will say anything to get elected. It certainly does not help her credibility to privately say that Saudi Arabia and neighboring gulf Emirates fund and support ISIS/ISIL and then accept millions of dollars from them- including a million dollar check birthday check for Bill Clinton. There are others where she privately calls “common core” a failure, defends fracking, is against legalizing marijuana, is still totally for gay marriage.. you get the picture.

However almost none of these important revelations about HRC are being discussed in the mainstream media. The mainstream, or more properly the establishment, media is full of endless interviews of poorly aging white women who claim that Trump sexually molested them years ago. Oddly enough, none of these women made a formal or informal compliant about his alleged behavior at that time. Infact, many of these accusers continued to be on very good terms with him until he announced his intention to run for the presidency. Furthermore, there is no way to verify the veracity of their claims via third-party testimony or other forms of objective evidence.

The endless promotion of such news items about Trump while simultaneously refusing to cover the Podesta leaks strongly suggests that the mainstream media (in collusion with the Clinton campaign) is deliberately running a massive fake news operation against Trump to stop his democratic election to the presidency.

While there are those who think such negative coverage by the media will hurt Trump over the long-term, I think otherwise. And here is why.. How many of you remember the attacks on Trump’s emotional stability from three months ago, or the attacks originating from the Khan family a couple of months ago or those by Alicia Machado from three weeks ago. In every single case, these attacks had no real lasting effects on Trump’s standing in the polls. At best, these attacks appeared to have some negative effect in some polls for a few days followed by a rebound. In a future post, I will also share my thoughts on the apparently odd behavior of major pre-election polls.

So why are all these attacks on Trump by the Clinton campaign and mainstream (old) media failing to have any real effect on his popularity? Well, there are many reasons.. but they can be broadly classified into two categories. Firstly, it comes down to credibility or the lack thereof. It is no secret that constantly repeating stories and allegations with the same themes in absence of support from events in real life hurts credibility of those sources. The mainstream media have been crying wolf for so long that very few people (as a percentage of the population) still believe them.

Moreover, the internet allows Trump to issue his rebuttals and make counter-accusations to an audience that is far larger and more engaged than that now available to mainstream media. Some of you might know that many of Trump’s recent campaign speeches have between 200-300k YouTube views (per speech) within 48 hours of uploading them. Furthermore the footprint of people who believe him, or follow him, on various social media platforms is in the tens of millions. Between that and his very well attended rallies, he has a far larger non-traditional media presence than HRC.

Secondly, the public image he has cultivated over three decades is such that controversies that would sink conventional politicians have no negative effect on him. Everybody knows that he is brash and rude rich guy who likes the company of attractive women. That is part of his image and appeal. Nobody expects him to speak like Obama or anybody else from an east-coast ivy league university. His lack of pretense about enjoying fast food or wearing ill-fitting suits makes him look normal and real in comparison to politicians with HRC who are incapable of anything approaching spontaneous or normal human behavior.

Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, people have grown to associate the media image of politicians like HRC with greed, corruption, lying and systemic decay. It does not help that public trust in institutions, from the medical establishment to journalism, is at an all time low- and still going down. In this environment, a candidate like Trump appears more viable and reasonable than all those credentialed expert-types whose only apparent skills seem to be finding new ways of scamming and looting the majority of people. We also cannot discount the possibility that some of his supporters want to elect him for the express purpose of destroying the status quo- one in which they have no worthwhile future.

What do you think? Comments?

  1. Wilson
    October 15, 2016 at 4:58 pm

    Would hope that men wake up, since this is the kind of character assassination they can expect in school, work, and in private relationships; and of course they aren’t billionaires who can stand their ground, they are simply steamrolled. The “empowerment” of women to slander men has progressed significantly under Obama, with Hillary it will not doubt reach extreme levels as legislation and court precedents formalize the loss of due process

    • Atlanta Man
      October 16, 2016 at 2:00 pm

      Men are slowly waking up to this. The women are going too far with this shit, and a lot of men are just checking out….

  2. October 15, 2016 at 5:06 pm

    https://homeiswherethehateis.wordpress.com/2016/10/12/a-solid-clip-from-the-daily-show-about-donald-trumps-2005-pussygate-scandal/

    You know, a lot of manginas post status updates about “I would never let a man talk about women like this around me.” Blah blah blah – Idiot Trump had the nerve to mention it was “locker room banter”, which is his way of “dry snitching” on other guys to mask his stupidity – which could easily fuck it up for the other guys to have eye-opening discussions about women’s duplicity.

    • webej
      October 16, 2016 at 10:41 am

      Just saw a whole newpaper supplement about feminism under threat, on the cover Trump and a quote in a balloon: “Treat them like shit”. As if this proves that Trump is an enemy of women. Reminds me of junior high: Treat ‘m mean, keep ‘m keen; Treat ‘m nice, catch the ice.

  3. chaoserrant
    October 15, 2016 at 7:33 pm

    Since I consider the advent of feminism, SJW, political correctness, anti male attitude, etc..a cumulative catastrophe, for me Clinton is far more dangerous. Unfortunately, I am afraid she will win not because her followers are in majority but because the Electoral College and the swing states. When the difference is small you cannot win with an entire constituency against you (women, blacks, etc.). And, unfortunately, women (and also the male lap dogs), are susceptible to emotional effects created by Trump tape. My suspicion is that even if Wikileaks shows a document proving Clinton sold USA to Putin with receipt and all, she will still be voted by a large population just because vagina…I really hope I will be prove wrong but, alas, I just don’t feel this battle can be won. It is a shame that Republicans did not find a nominee with both balls and political shrewdness.


    You would be correct if we lived in the pre-2008 era. But we do not. People don’t realize how much the popular mood and mindset has changed since 2008 and even 2012.

    BTW, “scientific” polls in UK conduced right upto the day before the Brexit vote “predicted” that the stay side would win by about 5 %. We know what happened.

    • chaoserrant
      October 16, 2016 at 6:06 am

      I hope you are right. It will also depend on the turnout to the polls. Also, it is possible that, from now on, no extra dirt on Trump will have any marginal effect. I mean what is next: a tape having him saying he likes to eat children? The media onslaught still may have an effect though in creating this doomsday scenario by implying a Trump election is tantamount to WW3. So, it is possible, that an undecided voter to not care about sex accusations but fear that the country will collapse just because Trump is so different.

      Anyway, lots of uncharted territory. On thing is clear: many Trump voters right now are quite silent and, therefore, hidden. Especially in Academia (my case) where you can lose your job and credibility in a second if you raise your voice against the hive orthodoxy.

      • webej
        October 16, 2016 at 10:34 am

        Actually it is Hillary that will lead us closer to WW3. Trump has said he is not opposed to waiving a first strike possibility in the nuclear doctrine. Trump has said he favors a deal with Russia and pulling the troops back. Compared to Hillary’s sponsorship of warfare and the neocons, in addition to being in the pocket of the (military industrial) establishment, people like me with a single issue (reduce chance of thermonuclear apocalypse) vote will definitely go for Trump. Unfortunately the MSM gives very little space to the kinds of people warning us that we are closer to WW3 now than ever during the cold war (when it almost happened a few times by accident, but for the heroic actions by individuals who took responsibility instead of following orders).

    • webej
      October 16, 2016 at 10:36 am

      You are not discounting the amount of electoral fraud that takes place in the USA, despite the image of incorruptible democracy that we like to hold up. The entire electoral establishment will be on the side of fraudulent votes for Hillary.

      Oh.. I am counting on the democrats to pull that shit and thus discredit the system.

  4. Atlanta Man
    October 16, 2016 at 1:58 pm

    I have my own selfish reasons for voting for Trump but these bullshit “allegations” of him “sexually assaulting” woman just make me want to vote for him even more. When the first republican debate went down and Megan Kelly attacked Trump as sexist and it did not stick, plus he was able to attack her back claiming she was “Bleeding out of her wherever”, I knew the political paradigm had shifted.

    Trump is a rich, narcissistic asshole that uses his fame and money to fuck as many hot young bitches as possible. Any man in his position would do the same, and any man that tells you otherwise is a fucking liar. His hot mic comments to Billy Bush are how men talk when woman are not around, it is certainly how my friends and I talk-except we far more perverse and profane.

    These fake ass allegations reek of the same bullshit they pulled on Bill Cosby. Old , dried up woman making claims and accusations years after the supposed “sexual misconduct” occurred. It is a transparent farce, and voters know it.

    Trump is going to win, it will be close, but he is going to win. Nothing in Slate, The Daily Beast, or Salon is going to stop it.


    Agree.. he needs to win, if only to expose the pathetic status quo.

    • chaoserrant
      October 16, 2016 at 3:39 pm

      The official excuse as to why the women accusers did not come out sooner is because they were afraid since it is hard to go against a rich guy. I say, to the contrary. A rich guy is even more exposed since there will be no shortage of pro bono lawyers to attack him on behalf of the accusers given the possibility to milk some fat cash. History proves that the richer you are the more you should be afraid of false rape accusations.

      • P Ray
        October 16, 2016 at 9:48 pm

        Yup. Or race may have been a factor.
        Re: Hannah Bouveng versus (married) Benjamin Wey,
        Or (married) Kobe Bryant accused of rape by a woman.

        It seems that many of the accusations so far (who knows false or not, but again, when you are rich, try not to get married or see women just out of their teens if possible AND RECORD), have 3 things in common:
        1. Person Of Colour (married) and single woman
        2. Person Of Colour (unmarried) and single woman
        3. White Person (unmarried) and single woman.

        Maybe this will also signal type 4: White Person (married) and single woman.

  5. Biff Tannen
    October 18, 2016 at 3:06 am

    When you're famous, they let you do it, you can do anything, just grab em by the pussy

    A post shared by Dan Bilzerian (@danbilzerian) on

    • P Ray
      October 23, 2016 at 5:25 am

      Yup. Also add Travers Beynon to that list.
      But because they are “Chad Thundercocks” they can talk like that without repercussions.

      Interesting how the world has always had double standards, now it just becomes more apparent daily.

  6. shiningtime
    October 18, 2016 at 8:26 pm

    Trump may be an all around dirt bag but he speaks truth when he says the media are colluding against him. That much is obvious to the unbiased observer such as myself. What he said ten years ago on that bus is meaningless. I laughed at it. It’s just that. Locker room talk. Trump is a man that likes pus$y. Fair enough. I do too. The leap to classify him as some sort of sexual deviate was something I knew the media would do. This tactic has been used over and over. It is used to great effect against black men or men of color. See Tiger woods. The media are owned by large corporations who are themselves beholden to wall street who are bed fellows with the high ranking members of the federal government. It’s not hard to make the connections

  1. October 16, 2016 at 5:38 pm
  2. October 27, 2016 at 4:09 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: