Home > Critical Thinking, Current Affairs, Dystopia, Musings, Reason, Secular Religions, Skepticism > On Establishment Attempts at Deposing Trump via a Procedural Coup: 1

On Establishment Attempts at Deposing Trump via a Procedural Coup: 1

As many of you must be aware of by now- the democratic establishment, corporate media and many public “intellectuals” are currently engaged in a PR campaign to stop Trump from obtaining the 270 votes required to be elected president by the electoral college. While such an attempt to depose or at least de-legitimize Trump is almost certain (over 99.9%) to fail in a spectacular fashion, I have a feeling that there is about even chance (50/50) that the democratic establishment and its flunkies are going to make a serious attempt to pull off some sort of procedural coup on (or before) December 19, 2016. In this post, I will talk about why they are trying such a desperate move and where such an action might ultimately lead.

But before we go further, let us quickly go over the series of events that led us to this.. most peculiar situation. Some of you might remember that the HRC camp (and her mainstream media shills) were mocking Trump for raising the possibility of the presidential election being rigged- as late as the afternoon of November 8. At that time, the HRC camp was totally confident she would win the presidential election- by at least a few electoral votes, if not a landslide. Well.. things did not turn out that way. Instead, HRC lost the electoral college by a pretty substantial margin. She even lost states like Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania- which were supposed to be relatively safe “democrat” states. Also, she barely won Minnesota and Virginia- states that were considered to be solidly “democrat” states.

All of her expensive and extensive presidential campaign operation turned out be.. well.. worse than useless. HRC lost the election even though her campaign raised over 1.2 billion dollars, which is over twice of what Trump’s campaign raised. She lost the election even though she started out with more safe democratic-voting states and electoral votes than Trump. She lost the election even though she had almost unanimous support from the mainstream media and their talking heads, not to mention many prominent “activists” on the internet. She lost the election even though she was running against Donald Trump, a person with even higher unfavorability ratings than herself. She lost to a candidate who did not even have the full support of his own party.

Historically, candidates who suffer such humiliating defeats tend to acknowledge (sooner or later) the true reasons behind their electoral rout. HRC is.. well.. different. To date, her flying monkeys.. I mean spoke-persons.. have blamed everyone but her for the electoral rout. Here is a quick list of all the factors and persons blamed for her defeat- Wikileaks, Julian Assange, Russian hackers, Vladimir Putin, racist white working class men, self-hating white women, inadequately enthusiastic black voters, uninspired millennial voters, James Comey, the FBI and of course Bernie Sanders and his “Bernie Bros” (a significant percentage of whom are female and non-white). Oddly enough, her squads of flying monkeys openly ignore the fact that she was widely seen as an artificial, dishonest candidate who was widely loathed and distrusted by a majority of people in the country- especially the working class (regardless of their race).

In other words, HRC and her elite supporters are still pushing the idea that she lost the election despite being the “best” presidential candidate to ever run for that office in the entire history of USA. While some of this odd behavior can be traced back to a desire to not appear publicly disloyal to their ex-employer/patron, it is clear that something else accounts for their desire to ignore reality. Here is my take on what might be going on in the head of HRC apologists and supporters. These people, you see, live in a social and geographical bubble where neoliberalism is the only true religion. Most of these people actually believe that the neoliberal worldview is the only legitimate worldview. They are unable to imagine a world which works in a way that contradicts their mental models of reality.

Once you realize that establishment liberals have this self-imposed mental limitation, it is easy to understand why they are trying to depose or de-legitimize Trump’s election via a procedural coup. They literally unable to interact with reality in ways other than those they are familiar with- namely, by using scams involving laws, rules and procedures. They have no ability to start a popular uprising or stage a military coup. They see people outside their social bubble as being somewhere between domesticated animals and second-rate humans. In other words- they cannot mentally conceive of a way to overturn the victory of Trump by means that does not involve playing around with laws, rules and procedures.

Readers might have noticed that the discredited mainstream media and its talking/writing heads have been very busy trying to discredit Trump’s victory since the day after the election. While I have no particular affection for Trump, it is clear that he won by the pre-established rules of the electoral contest. Of late, the liberal establishment and its flunkies have been trying to promote all sorts of bullshit “news stories” allegedly sourced from anonymous members of the CIA claiming that “the Russians hacked the election and are responsible for Trump’s victory”. People with more than half a brain and some appreciation of recent history know that this charge is fabricated. Nonetheless, establishment liberals and their flunkies are trying very hard(and desperately) to use these stories to get about 30-40 republican members of the electoral college to vote for somebody other than Trump.

It bears repeating that a simple defection of even 40 republican members of the electoral college will at best result in the decision being passed to the speaker of the house- Paul Ryan, who is a republican. While Paul is exactly a big fan of Trump, he is unlikely to appoint somebody else as President- largely because doing so would put a permanent target on his head- literally. There is also the extremely unlikely scenario where 40 republican electors vote for HRC, thus electing her as president. Needless to say, the second scenario would pretty much destroy popular belief in the legitimacy of national government in USA.

And this brings us to the next big question- Do establishment democrats and their flunkies grasp the monumental and irreversible effects of their efforts to depose or de-legitimize Trump? Well.. the short answer is, surprisingly, NO. I will devote the upcoming post in this series to explaining, in some detail, why establishment democrats and their sycophants are not able to understand the massive and irrevocable effects of their attempt at a procedural coup.

What do you think? Comments?

  1. Atlanta Man
    December 15, 2016 at 10:40 am

    Trump will be sworn in %100. However you are right about liberals that surround Hillary, they are blinded by ideology. They cannot fathom that there are people who were completely unimpressed by Hillary. The way the liberal news sites like Slate, Salon, and MSNBC are reporting on Trump since his victory are hilarious. They are all in a bubble and they cannot see how bizarre it looks to people outside of that bubble.

  2. Ed
    December 15, 2016 at 10:53 am

    I’m glad you are addressing this, but I have a different take.

    Throughout my adult life (since the Berlin Wall fell, essentially), the rulers of the United States went on all in governing according to “globalism” or what Steve Sailer calls “invade the world, invite the world, in hoc to the world.” This seems to have been a deliberate strategy of lowering the standard of living of the American middle class, by relocating industries to developing countries, and by importing large numbers of workers from developing countries to do the work that couldn’t be off-shored. Running up a large amount of debt, as well as forcibly changing governments in the developing world that didn’t go along, were also part of this strategy. Both the Democratic Party and Republican Parties have been on board with this, though individual pols might have raised objections to this or that element.

    Hilary Clinton got the support of large corporations and the mainstream media because she has championed this strategy, while Trump has publlically criticized several elements of it. He may not follow through, but the “establishment” did not want a Trump administration. But the “establishment” is powerful, ruthless, but inept. They keep on coming up with schemes to block this but failing.

    The easiest way to stop Trump was to rally around an attractive (to voters) alternative in the Republican primaries, but they screwed that up. I think the original script called for Hillary Clinton losing to someone like Rubio or Jeb Bush. Then there was the idea of having the Republican convention ignore the primaries and nominated someone else anyway. Once that fell through, I think the plan was to steal the election to Hilary Clinton, but too much information emerged via Wikileaks that she really should be kept far away from the White House, so at the last minute this was aborted and the decision was made to just deal with Trump. Now you have this complicated Electoral College gambit. The idea, by the way, is not to make Hilary Clinton president at this time, but to through the election to the House, who will then elect the GOP establishment hack that the faithless electors put forward. A lot of these plans are failing due to the original problem, they never could coalesce around an acceptable globalist GOP alternative.

    Actually, HRC was always the elite candidate of choice in 2016- because, face it, the cosmopolitan elite look down on unpolished republicans.

    The next plan will be to impeach and remove Trump, and I think that one will actually work, but you now need to let him take office first, you need the Democratis on board, and they may not want to install Pence in the White House.

    Also, whenever it looks like the GOP establishment is going to get rid of him, Trump has gone into basically appeasement mode until the danger passes. This happened at the Convention and is happening now with the Cabinet picks, because of the Electoral College gambit. But recount part of the gambit already fell flat so it looks like that has passed. I think he is looking to negotiate a deal to get at least some parts of his agenda through.

  3. webej
    December 15, 2016 at 7:42 pm

    All the people now engaged in hyping the idea that Vladimir Putin has tipped the boat to get Trump to slide to the helm are facing complete delegitimacy in the future. It could also be that all kinds of players are afraid of what may be revealed once Trump is in power — how much corruption, intrigue, conspiracy, lying, and subversion of the rule of law there actually has been, and the possible consequences for them personally.
    The more they dig, the worse things get. Vote recounting turns up evidence of Democratic tampering. The whole intelligence community are fools philosophizing about Russian hacking when it is insiders (?Seth Rich) who actually handed off the material. First the electoral college was a stupid relic that needed doing away with. Now it turns out to be a supremely wise constitutional instrument to block a demagogue tyrant from taking power. All of these people and institutions are losing ground by the day. What’s more, there is every possibility that Trump could join them once in power (losing credibility).

    Oh, he will lose credibility in about 2-3 years. The best part is that his fall will destroy the last vestiges of popular belief in the ability of american capitalism to deliver anything useful for the majority.

  4. December 15, 2016 at 11:20 pm

    how is HRC just like Dick Spence and the alt-reich…

    http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/12/huma-abedin-life-after-clinton

    they blame it all on the muzzie..


    In many ways, HRC is worse than those people- because she pretends to be otherwise.

  5. Not Born This Morning
    December 16, 2016 at 7:56 am

    The neoliberals will only further delegitimize themselves and their mentality. In addition to this, their failure and continued failures will indirectly legitimize Trump and his administration in the short run. This will provide CONservativists more freedom to fleece the country as they will undoubtedly establish policy and law that will insure more upward redistribution of income.

    As I have said before, the elite are not especially good at long term or strategic thinking (link 1, link 2)

  6. P Ray
    December 17, 2016 at 12:02 am

    It will be lovely when the CONservatives (republicans and democrats) realise that they cannot deliver on their promises without either:
    1. starting a war overseas
    2. trimming the (SJW) fat domestically

    Trump’s victory is good because it makes SJWs cry.

    True.. I have personally enjoyed watching SJWs freak out and cry in response to Trump’s victory.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: