Home > Critical Thinking, Current Affairs, Dystopia, Musings, Philosophy sans Sophistry, Reason, Secular Religions, Skepticism > More Thoughts on the Flaming Disaster of Kavanaugh’s Nomination

More Thoughts on the Flaming Disaster of Kavanaugh’s Nomination

Let me be upfront about something before we proceed any further. I had no real desire to write another post about the latest train-wreck in DC aka Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to Supreme Court. There are so many other interesting and consequential topics which I could have written about. Sadly, the shitshow surrounding nomination of that worthless loser has become national news and could have some pretty significant effects on immediate future- specifically outcome of November 2018 elections.

With that in mind, let me revisit what I wrote about that rich rapey mediocre prep-school jock a few days ago. It is my firm opinion that the idiots in Republican establishment should never have nominated somebody as widely despised as Kavanaugh. The recently publicized sexual assault accusations against him are only a small part of the litany of reasons he is seen in such poor light by establishment Democrats. Kavanaugh was, after all, part of the Kenneth Starr “investigation” as well as Bush43’s administration. But why is that such a bad thing?

This is where I start telling stuff you might not want to hear. You see.. protection of the rich and capitalist class from average people has always the main function of Supreme Court and through most of its history it has been a highly regressive institution. The Warren Court was perhaps the only time in history that it consistently ruled in a quasi-progressive manner. But how the court has ruled since the 1980s? Long story short, it has consistently ruled in favor of the rich, powerful and corporations and against average people- with exception of social issues.

But why do establishment Democrats care about who is appointed to the Supreme Court? As you all know, both establishment Democrats and Republicans are corporate whores. But, then shouldn’t their choice of candidates for that court be almost identical? Well.. for a long time that was indeed the case. There is a reason why most Supreme Court nominees, as late as the 1990s, were confirmed by an almost unanimous Senate vote. Sure, some were a bit to the right and some to the left – but by and large, they were predictable “centrists”.

Then the presidential election of 2000 happened and we know the role played by a slim majority of that court in appointing Bush43 as president. From that moment onwards, the Supreme Court (and appointments to it) were irreversibly politicized. Of course, there were other reasons for that change- ranging from changing demography of USA, irreversible decline of white male privilege, establishment Democrats support of identity politics to cover up their neoliberal belief etc.

And this brings us to why the nomination of Kavanaugh was such a bad idea. Once again to make a long story short, he was always seen as a rabid partisan figure by Democrats and there was no way they were going to confirm him. But could things have gone differently if that orange-haired buffoon had nominated a less controversial figure? What about somebody like Thomas Hardiman? For starters, the guy is a good corporate whore- just like his appointed predecessors. More importantly, his wife and in-laws are of Mexican descent and prominent democrats.

In other words, Hardiman in addition to having a compelling life story and being a good corporate whore could be relied upon to support progressive social causes. Sure, he would have only been 90% of the corporate whore Kavanaugh would be, but let us be realistic- it would be way easier to confirm him. In fact, even sad turtle face aka Mitch McConnell conveyed that to Trump on more than one occasion. But the dumbfucks in White House thought they knew better than everybody else and decided to nominate that post-menopausal woman-faced loser.

But why so much hate for this guy? Well.. it is way more than hate. I can foresee very plausible scenarios in which his confirmation (or even failed nomination) could have large impacts on the results of 2018 and 2020 elections. But before we go there, let us talk about why the sexual assault charges against him are so sticky and problematic. I kinda hinted to that in the previous paragraph by calling him a ‘post-menopausal woman-faced loser’. Still confused at what I am hinting at? OK.. let us do a thought experiment.

Imagine that the person nominated to the supreme court had the looks of a handsome masculine actor, rock star or sportsman. Now ask yourself, would sexual assault accusations by Christine Blasey Ford have been more credible or less credible? Would she have even accused him of sexual assault in the first place? Ok.. let me ask you a question, which might seem odd. Have you noticed a common thread running through almost every man who has lost his career because of accusations of sexual assault or harassment. Anything..

What about their looks or lack thereof? Have you noticed that the most famous scalps taken by the MeToo movement have been mediocre to ugly-looking men (Harvey Weinstein, Bill O’Reilly, Charlie Rose, Roger Ailes etc) with either a lot of power or money? For some “odd” reason, handsome men with complicated sex lives such as such as Rob Lowe and Charlie Sheen (in their prime), music icons (Lenny Kravitz and almost every other famous male musician) and sport-stars just don’t seem to end up on MeToo lists. It is always the mediocre-looking guy (usually white) who got lucky and made a lot of money or came into some power.

But why is that so? The simple answer to that question is that looks, physicality and attitude are attractive to women in a way that money and power are just not. That is why the white wife of a white physician will gladly cheat on him with some mediocre musician- but the reverse will never happen unless money changes hands. Kavanaugh, you see, comes across an effeminate white guy who was born to rich parents, got into an expensive prep school and ivy-league university because of parents’s connection and glided through life despite his utter mediocrity.

To put it another way, this guy has not made many (if any) pussies wet- even in his twenties. And this is why those charges of sexual assault and general rapey behavior have turned out to be so sticky. He really looks like the rich but mediocre looking white guy who has to sexual assault women or otherwise compensate them to get laid. It does not help that he is such a terrible liar. To summarize, he instinctively looks and behaves like a mediocre-looking prep-school rapey asshole and most women are viscerally repulsed by guys like Kavanaugh.

But why does this matter? The simple answer is 2018 and 2020 elections. The slightly longer answer is that the Democratic party had been unable to come up with a program or issue which was strong or visceral enough to increase turnout among likely voters in the 2018 mid-term election. All that constant talk about Russia, Putin, Collusion was simply not influencing voters who are not already partisan. Then Trump gave them an unexpected gift by nominating an hypocritical and effeminate prep-school asshole who just happened to have done some pretty repulsive (at least for women) things when he was younger.

Now they have a highly emotive issue to constantly beat republican candidates over the head with and simultaneously increase turnout of their own voter base. And this is not going away whether, or not, he is confirmed. Indeed.. confirming him might be the greatest gift received by moribund establishment Democrats since the election of Trump. And ya.. he will almost certainly be subject to multiple criminal investigations once confirmed resulting in his impeachment (or resignation) within 2-3 years. Establishment republicans, being as pathetic as their Democratic counterparts, still think they can wing it by getting him confirmed. I guess that stupid people cannot (or won’t) find out any other way.

What do you think? Comments?

  1. Jamal Rahim
    September 30, 2018 at 10:32 pm

    First off, where in your mind have you determined that Kavanaugh is an ugly looking man? He’s decently better looking than the majority of men at the White House. Second, he was a varsity jock, and captain of the varsity basketball team. We both know how much pussy Varsity jocks get in high school. Now look at Trump. The man is fat and ugly and has yet to have a wife cheat on him with the pool boy. Why? Because Trump is alpha as they can be. The men who got MeToo’d were all beta schlubs on top of being ugly losers. And lets get one thing clear, Trump has never raped anyone, let alone sexually assaulted anyone, as much as the media wants you to believe. On one hand you argue that it’s these ugly men’s wealth and power that women get attracted to, but don’t find the man sexually attracting. So is that a reason to call out sexual assault and get these men’s career and reputation destroyed? I can understand if you hate Kavanaugh based on that he’d be a shitty judge serving the corporate interest, but the fact that you hate the man for that and are willing to assume that he’s a rapey dude because he’s white, and went to a rich prep school, you’re just a phony as those raging SJW feminist harpies.

    Trump and his delusional white house lackeys could easily have nominated a far more palatable corporate whore. But they had to choose the one despised POS with tons of skeletons in his closet. They were stupid enough to think that he could be easily pushed through the process.

    There are many reasons Kavanaugh should never have been nominated, but his history of drunken asshole-ish behavior is especially problematic because it is so relatable for most people. And ya, the democrats are doing this because of the upcoming 2018 election.

  2. Uhc2071
    October 1, 2018 at 3:39 am

    Once again sentencing without evidence or anything much except non-corroborated accusations because of the color of his skin and his wealth much like duke and uva. Well, based on your logic, till and black wall street got what they deserved as well based on the accusations of white women. You’re a wonderful source of wisdom. Or maybe you really hate European-americans. That’s your right, but maybe you should just admit it so we know you want them hung, drawn and quartered before reading your opinions.

    • Colby
      October 1, 2018 at 4:26 am

      He essentially has. Faggot Indian Race Troll is gonna Faggot Indian Race Troll.

    • P Ray
      October 2, 2018 at 6:26 am

      It might also be a lot of the rage you feel at the author is the revelation of knowing you are the last person considered for a fair shot at promotions, justice, relationships or business.
      In that case, go to another country, unless you think your “White privilege” will save you in your own country where it is evident it’s not working out

  3. Eduardo the Magnificent
    October 1, 2018 at 12:16 pm

    I used to think you were a thoughtful dissenter who was just left of center. Now I think you’re a 14-year old video gaming kid who got your ideas form a Marxist Cracker Jack box.

    Probably an immigrant to boot. Or a minority. Go fuck yourself and go the fuck back home.

    • Lolsack
      October 3, 2018 at 3:00 pm

      Lol racists triggered really hard by this article

  4. tomjones
    October 1, 2018 at 1:02 pm

    If I could wave a magic wand and enforce my doctrine with Maoist fist around the world, it would be this:
    You can’t accuse someone of a “crime” if happened 10 years ago or more (even if the crime is murdering a little girl).
    You can’t arrest someone for something that happened 10 years ago or more.
    The idea that a 40 year old man can arrested or jailed or have his whole life ruined based on a accusation (true or not) that he grabbed your 15 year old titties when he was a randy 16 year old teenager.
    So what? Everyone, literally all 7 billion individuals, has done foolish things when they were young.

    They would not have cared about his past indiscretions if he did not already have a reputation for being a petty asshole and generally anti-woman. Also, that idiot is a horrible liar. I mean.. why try to make yourself look like a choir boy when dozens of people will testify to him being an obnoxious drunk in HS and University.

    • Jhthw
      October 1, 2018 at 4:22 pm

      Once again, accusing without evidence. Generally anti woman means what? Not killing the child in utero? Or are you just pissed that girls were more interested in the stereotypical drunk frat boy than the nerdy phd who loves him some escorts?

      If he was the charming frat boy stud, nobody would have come out to accuse him.

      • P Ray
        October 2, 2018 at 5:41 am

        Basically, he’s ugly. But especially, an ugly guy, that is being considered for a powerful position, that also has jock mores and habits. Well, he should have realised that, but he grew up before the blackpill, found a woman who wanted to be his wife, and thought his previous Jock behaviour was forgotten.

        He should have been attractive. Remember that Italian proverb “A handsome face covers a thousand sins”.

        And also remember Rectal Ravager Ronaldo!

  5. Shiningtime
    October 1, 2018 at 3:23 pm

    You’re reaching. There is no proof he assaulted Ford. It’s her word vs his. Everyone at that level is a a dirt bag of some kind. You have to be in order to rise the political ranks.

    It does not matter what I or you believe about that case. The vast majority of women below a certain age already see Kavanaugh as a rapist, for reasons I have mentioned in the post. At this stage, confirming him to the SC would be a much bigger disaster than dropping him like a rock.

    • Eduardo the Magnificent
      October 1, 2018 at 4:32 pm

      Our idiot author is making the mistake of giving a shit what women think. He’ll learn when he gets #MeToo’ed

      • P Ray
        October 2, 2018 at 5:38 am

        The men that face no flack for openly saying MeToo is shit … are in the top 1% …
        so you’re equally exposed to that “mistake of giving a shit what women think”. Unless you’re so attractive that your opinion of women doesn’t matter, you’re equally at risk …
        and if you’re so attractive women come to you, beware getting acidfaced from the guy you “steal” her from.

      • Eduardo the Magnificent
        October 2, 2018 at 8:12 am

        You’re seem awful hung up on attractive men. Repressed memories? Or is it jealousy?

      • P Ray
        October 2, 2018 at 8:49 am

        You seem to be hung up on other people getting advantages you will never have, or don’t consider that different people have different perspectives.
        Is that ignorance or stupidity?

      • Eduardo the Magnificent
        October 2, 2018 at 6:35 pm

        Whaaa!! Someone has more than meeee!!! Whaaa!!!

        Grow the fuck up.

      • P Ray
        October 2, 2018 at 7:11 pm

        Big man, you better be aware of an f-word that will curdle your insides … feminism.
        Your fuck this and fuck that, doesn’t rate diddly squat against that …

      • Eduardo the Magnificent
        October 4, 2018 at 2:03 pm

        “Did you just say the F word?”

        “What, you mean Jew?”

      • P Ray
        October 5, 2018 at 1:15 am

        Lel, an edgelord believing what is said on an Internet page is going to give them real life status.

    • Ricky Vargas
      October 3, 2018 at 8:50 pm

      This right here, the OP is pandering the SJW feminist harpies. He’s clearly fucking delusional. He’s siding with the fucking feminist MeToo’ers! What past does Kavanaugh have that’s so dirty? That he drank beers in college and went to parties? If I investigate every dude’s partying habits from high school and college, will I find saints? You’re a new kind of idiot. What about all the ex-girlfriends of Kavanaughs who have come forward and said that they did not find anything sinister about him? What about the 75 women (youtube it) who have come forward and spoken highly of Kavanaugh? Who about the all-girls youth basketball team that he coaches that all have spoken so highly of him? Seriously dude, stop writing this blog anymore. Can’t take your shit seriously or credible anymore. You’re just an Indian dude who hates his own kind. We get it.

      • P Ray
        October 5, 2018 at 1:41 am

        For all the ugly guys that gets accused of rape there are definitely a few handsome guys that managed to get a woman to turn up on his doorstep, had some drinks just lying around and got her drunk and then managed to ride redolent rods into her vacuous valley.

        Of course there will be some weak resistance. But then much later she will rise up saying “I wuz raped” and of course go out of her way to demonise ugly/regular ethnics who didn’t have anything to do with the princess’ plundered pussy.

        That’s why it’s hard to sympathise with those women. They talk a good game about justice, but really are too chickenshit most of the time to step up, and to assuage their feelings of inadequacy they go full racist against minorities.

  6. October 1, 2018 at 5:10 pm

    This reminds me of an old skit from The Chris Rock Show on HBO. When Clinton got caught in the sex scandal, Republicans and COnservatives took it and ran with it. Chris Rock mad fun of old, fat white COnservatives saying women’s pussies don’t get wet by guys like Newt Gingrich and those like him. While there’s no proof this Kavanaugh piece of shit did these things, this IS typical behavior from MFs like him.

    Yep.. and I too have been saying that for years.

    On another hand, I saw a meme on Facebook where even an 8 year old thought the woman was lying, saying if something did happen to her and she’s trying to recall it, she wouldn’t have to read it from a paper. It would be from the heart…

    Given what we know about Kavanaugh + alcohol, her account is very believable.

  7. MikeCA
    October 1, 2018 at 5:39 pm

    This is all about evangelicals. White evangelicals have high approval ratings for Trump and Republicans. Even white evangelical women strongly support Trump. This support is all about abortion, Evangelicals are counting on Trump to appoint supreme court justices to overturn Roe v Wade.

    Shouldn’t evangelical women be upset about Kavanaugh’s sexual assault of Ford? You might think so, but evangelical authority figures are telling them to support Kavanaugh and the allegations are all political tricks by Democrats. They can also rationalize this by saying Ford was 15 and shouldn’t have been at a party like that or Kavanaugh was only 17 and should not be held accountable today for that kind of behavior (he didn’t actually rape Ford).

    Evangelicals are the reason Republicans are trying to ram Kavanaugh onto the supreme court. They are afraid that if they withdraw Kavanaugh at this point, evangelicals will not strongly support Republicans in November. They would never vote for Democrats but they might just not vote.

    I think Democrats realize that in the end Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski and Jeff Flake will probably fold and vote to put Kavanaugh on the court. They want to de-legitimize Kavanaugh and the new conservative majority as much as possible. Chief justice John Roberts is concerned about the image of the Supreme Court. This may make Roberts reluctant to actually overturn Roe v Wade. De-legitimizing Kavanaugh is a desperate strategy to save Roe v Wade.

    Personally, I watch all of Kavanaugh testimony at the one day hearing last week. Anyone that behaves like that does not belong on the Supreme Court.

    Yes, I am aware of why the idiots in WH wanted to nominate him. Guess what.. this is the cost for trying to pull that crap on people.

  8. botterd
    October 1, 2018 at 5:54 pm

    Puzzled by the conviction you have that he will be impeached on criminal investigations in subsequent years. What kind of criminal facts do you have in mind???

    There are peculiar gaps between what he + his wife made and what they spent. Long story short, he kept on getting hundreds of thousands (literally out of thin air) when he desperately needed cash.

  9. botterd
    October 1, 2018 at 5:59 pm

    Is the new standard then that any woman who has bedded a beta male will understandably to society claim in retrospect that it was of course a rape, why else would she have done him?

    A corollary implies that women will only bed a beta male for ulterior motives, which is tantamount to prostitution, or in modern parlance, “human trafficking”.

    Marriage is a sad version of prostitution.

    • P Ray
      October 2, 2018 at 5:36 am

      Only applies to any woman who can bed the beta male, that does not suffer hardship, inconvenience or challenges to her lifestyle by splitting from him.
      Either look to be a part of countries with very strict immigration requirements for spouses, or those that don’t allow non-citizens to become citizens, or those that take a long time to become citizens AND that don’t follow IMBRA.

      Marriage is a sad version of prostitution, when the man is stupid, blue-pilled or is moronically idealistic.

  10. botterd
    October 1, 2018 at 6:27 pm

    How rapey is it exactly when one teen-ager is lying on another, all clothes still on, and a third piles on at which point they all tumble off the bed ?? Sounds to me like a morphed version of eight year old frolicking with perhaps some concomitant epiphenomenal subjective sexual feelings.

    In that case, he should not have gone after Bill Clinton for lying about getting BJs from Monica Lewinsky. He is paying for his past sins..

    • Jhthw
      October 2, 2018 at 4:06 am

      No evidence except he should have left ole bill alone. Your palatable corporate whore is just one with Mexicans in his family. As long as you’re on the right team by identity or ideology, we will ignore all transgressions whether they be false, unproveable or even true. Just make sure you are on my team, not white or wealthy.

      • P Ray
        October 2, 2018 at 5:14 am

        Whose team are you on when it comes to the article:
        “Repeated Rectal Ravager Ronaldo Refutes Ruinous Rape Reports”?

        Dude ain’t white, he’s wealthy, and definitely a Chad Thundercock.

  11. hoipolloi
    October 3, 2018 at 12:29 am

    Latest news headline, More Than 500 Law Professors Condemn Kavanaugh For ‘Lack Of Judicial Temperament’ during the last Senate committee hearing session. What kind of effect this letter going to have on the nomination confirmation?

  12. P Ray
    October 6, 2018 at 4:09 am

    Looks like the hits keep coming:
    Repeated Rectal Ravager Ronaldo’s Rampant Redolent Rupturing Rod Removes Renowned Runner’s Representation
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-6245071/Cristiano-Ronaldo-taken-FIFA-19-social-media-EA-Sports.html
    Cristiano Ronaldo taken off FIFA 19 social media by EA Sports amid allegations of rape against cover star
    The Juventus and Portuguese forward had featured in adverts on social media
    Cristiano Ronaldo has been used as face of the game for the previous two years
    The 33-year-old is now nowhere to be seen on the game’s promotional outlets
    Kathryn Mayorga filed a lawsuit alleging she was raped by Ronaldo in 2009

    Lel, looks like when you are 99% gentlemen and 1% bad man, better make sure you’ve paid for companionship during the 1%, so you only get to hear “I had to go to Emergency after last time without the additional and the police were informed.”

  1. October 6, 2018 at 11:07 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: