Home > Critical Thinking, Current Affairs, Dystopia, Musings, Philosophy sans Sophistry, Reason, Secular Religions, Skepticism > On the Peculiar Connection between Systemic Racism and Feminism: 1

On the Peculiar Connection between Systemic Racism and Feminism: 1

Regular readers know that I have written many posts about the intersection of racism and dating. In fact, that is why entire series such as Why Escorts are Always a Better Deal than Relationships or Marriage, Escorts are a better deal than ‘real’ women and How to Use Escorts exist in the first place. But what does any of this have to do with the intersection between racism and feminism? Well.. for starters, systemic racism by women in western countries is the main reason behind their vastly differing rates of having “unpaid” sex with men of various racial groups. However, as you will soon see, it goes much further than that and in ways you probably never appreciated. Let me start by asking you a simple question: Why is Feminism as we understand it today, in all its forms, largely restricted to Anglo, and perhaps Scandinavian, countries. Odd, isn’t it?

At this point, some of you might try to counter my suggestion that feminism is largely an Anglo and Scandinavian phenomena by pointing out that almost every single country in the world seems to, nowadays, have equal legal rights for men and women. And I do not disagree that the majority of countries today do have laws and, in many cases socio-economic systems, which do a good or at least decent job of treating men and women equally. Notice something peculiar about the wording of previous two sentences? See.. ensuring legal equality of the sexes is not the same as feminism- which is really about white women gaining primacy over all other men. While feminism did come into existence, as a movement, to ostensibly ensure that women were legally equal to men- that was never its initial nor ultimate goal.

Instead, feminism in Anglo countries started a project to gain primacy for rich and bourgeoisie white women. Don’t believe me? Did you know that luminaries of the suffragette movement were super racist white women? Also this fact is really well known in addition to causing a host of practical problems in the past. But it gets worse, if you can believe it. White suffragettes were into stuff like eugenics and forced sterilization, seriously racist views about black and asian men and a whole lot of other stuff which would get them labelled as a hate group today. All of this does however bring us to the next logical question: Why were Anglo, and to a lesser extent Scandinavian countries, such hotspots for Feminism? Why were other European countries full of equally racist losers, such as Germany or Italy, never that much into Feminism?

To better understand what I am going to talk about, let me ask you another seemingly unrelated question. How many male admirers will post comments on Instagram shots of an attractive woman in a thong bikini if she was from Germany, Spain, Brazil versus if she was from USA or UK? In my experience, there are between 10-40 times more positive comments from guys if the women in question is from Anglo countries than if she was from non-Anglo countries. And this has nothing to do with the degree of Instagram use in those countries. You can see the same pattern on social media networks more popular in non-Anglo countries than their Anglo counterparts. Leaving worshipful comments in response to photos of attractive women is just not that common outside the Anglosphere. But why is that so? What is going on?

Here is something else to think about.. Say a woman accuses some guy of date rape (a he said, she said situation). What percentage of men not related to the accuser will unconditionally believe her story in countries such as Germany, France and Italy versus USA? Why is it far higher in USA than in non-Anglo countries? What makes men in Anglo countries far more willing and eager to go along with any bullshit a white woman will say as compared to their counterparts in other (still) white-majority countries? Note that women in developed non-Anglo countries are no more (often less) likely to be suffer violence than their counterparts in Anglo countries. Nor are women in those countries likely to be poorer, unhealthier or worse off than their counterparts in Anglo countries- in fact, the converse is more likely. Once again, what is going on?

Then there is the issue of sex, both paid and “unpaid”. Why are white women in non-Anglo countries more likely to have a sexual relationship (than Anglo women) with a non-white guy, given the opportunity? Why are escorts born outside USA, or are early second-generation types from non-Anglo countries widely recognized as far more reasonable and generally way more fun than their Anglo counterparts? Why do people like RooshV and Matt Forney keep saying that women outside North America are far better than those within it? Why are the laws surrounding prostitution in some Anglo countries such as Australia, New Zealand and Canada more reasonable than those in USA or UK? And what does any of this have to do with the topic of this post?

In case you have not noticed the trend, let me state it explicitly. Male support for feminism in western countries correlates quite well with the size of empire it has or had and whether it was a society based in racial-apartheid (USA). That is why Feminism always has, and had, a far bigger presence in countries such as UK and USA than others such as Italy, Germany or even France. This is also why Feminism, SJW-ism and other white women-first movements are bigger in USA and UK than ex-colonies such as Canada, Australia and New Zealand- who seem to largely copy whatever occurs in USA. Now you know why otherwise rich western countries such as Netherlands and Switzerland have far fewer vocal feminist activists or public support for such ideas than countries like UK and USA. But why would the size of ex-colonial empires or erstwhile global influence create fertile grounds for Feminism?

It all comes down to the myths which people, who get lucky, have to invent to justify their newly found fortune. In the case of UK, its success at gaining overseas territory during the 19th century was largely due to factors beyond its own control. Whether it was the slow decline of French imperial ambitions after Napoleon or being present at the time of large-scale internal civil strife in countries such as India and China- they just got lucky. But human being do not like to admit (especially to themselves) that they owe their fortunes to luck. Hence the need to believe that they were, as a race, somehow inherently superior. You can see where this is going.. Also, the empire was mostly staffed by young men who lived in lands with very few white women. That is why inter-racial marriage was pretty common in many older colonies until the early 1800s. However this changed once the British empire started consolidating.

Placing white women on a pedestal makes sense only if it somehow translates into maintaining racial purity. Colonialism lead to the need for maintaining racial hierarchy and hence purity which lead to pedestalling white women which then lead to Feminism. And that is why a lot of early Feminism were rich racist white women who came from either the ruling or bourgeoisie class. This is also why most pre-1960s Feminists had an obsession with maintaining racial purity and the status quo. Let us now turn to USA aka the country built on theft of land from its original inhabitants, their subsequent genocide and wealth created through race-based slavery. While the USA was not, technically, an extra-territorial empire until the 1890s- this had much to do with it being not necessary. Westward expansion until early 20th century was just way easier.

As far as Scandinavian countries are concerned, things took a different route. While they gave up the idea of competing with UK, France and Spain for overseas colonies quite early, they benefited greatly from supporting colonialism through involvement in commercial activity in colonies and the process of colonization. So ya.. that is why systemic racism and Feminism have, historically, been joined at the hip. Feminism can only thrive in countries with a strong previous legacy of pedestalling white women due to a desire of maintaining racial purity. There is, of course, more to this story than Feminism being the end-product of delusions about intrinsic racial superiority. Will explain more in an upcoming post.

What do you think? Comments?

  1. Don
    March 21, 2019 at 10:16 am

    How do you explain the connection between the liberals such as yourself and feminism, SJW-ism and leftism while being a liberal who is opposed to all those things?

    I hate CONservatives, but don’t identify as a LIEbral.

    • Don
      March 21, 2019 at 10:38 pm

      I too hate conservatives and don’t identify as a liberal. (that is, Cons and Liars) Its good to know there is someone else in the middle ground like me. Thanks.

    • Jann Neumann
      March 24, 2019 at 9:34 am

      Liberal is a centre right position. While the small number of ‘liberal feminists’ can be liberals (I also know ones who are social democrats or anarchists) radical feminists & thirdwave feminists are usually on the left (and / or claim to be anarchists.) SJWs & leftists are not in anyway liberals, after all they use ‘liberal’ as a slur along with the #CombatLiberalism hashtag.

    • Don
      March 25, 2019 at 8:24 am

      How would you explain ideological subversion to an average person?

  2. P Ray
    March 21, 2019 at 4:19 pm

    One of the mysteries of feminism is why women from Asia who are either:
    1. studying in the West or
    2. migrated to the West,

    become super-feminist, aka “more feminist that feminist” to validate their credentials.

    remember reading about this woman who was born in Asia (family from Bangladesh, but she wasn’t born there), took a long time to get her permanent residency in Australia, chronically unemployed in Australia (currently at the 10-year mark), got raped by a woman … yet goes around writing about the threat of male rapists and incels.

    The flip side of the chronic unemployment, or at least the rarity of being in a customer-facing position might be that “she ugly”.

    Just wondering where such anomalies fit in.

    • Gp
      March 21, 2019 at 9:09 pm

      Great point. Women from Asia seem to be more hardcore feminist than white ones.
      Though I would not dismiss it totally coz women were/are denied their due in Asia , but i would also want AD to comment on why non-white women seem to be far more enthusiastic feminists than white ones

    • P Ray
      March 21, 2019 at 10:35 pm

      Music to accompany the words:

      “SHE UGLY – Dorrough Music & Teddy B (My Dougie cover)”

      I get it. Women like to say, “We’re not on Earth for men’s enjoyment.” In this case, these ones are on Earth to produce suffering, and are absolutely brazen about saying that to your face.

      Another super good reason why men should never be “male allies for a female feminist” is because …
      Women want men to like them and do favours for them, they just don’t want to acknowledge that they’re not attracted to the guy (it makes them feel bad as women supposedly value education and intelligence over looks) … so they just say he’s creepy, it’s inappropriate, how dare you use meetups with women to meet women?, you are sexualising women, you have no right to women.

      Makes me have the extreme showerthought (and we are allowed to think for ourselves still, right?), “It’s really hard to understand how wrong is rape, when that’s the only way men can meet women who are reasonably quiet and not complaining*”
      *I understand the alcohol, knife, violence and threats of poverty are pretty good aphrodisiacs. Plus if both people are drunk, both don’t consent. If a man wakes up next to a hambeast, did he get raped?

      When I see and observe women don’t make it clear what men they find attractive or how men can become attractive to women or even give demos on how men are allowed to meet women, trust me, those showerthoughts appear in my mind with regularity.

      The other showerthought is how women are allowed to rape men for life via alimony, but he isn’t allowed to claim “pussy payments” like Chris Rock has said.

    • P Ray
      March 30, 2019 at 9:47 am

      Another one of those “want to be whiter than white” Asians toeing the SJW agenda.
      Her big idea? “Don’t write about women in your newspaper, because they can get harassed and killed”. Just lel, that defeats the purpose of a newspaper AND more men than women have violence happen to them everywhere!
      Just a bunch of things to tick off:
      1. Asian female
      2. Ugly
      3. In a position of power
      4. Entitled.
      https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6867617/Sara-Khan-Manchester-University-student-union-officer-demands-sensitivity-reader-Mancunian.html


      But there’s a punchline! Her amendments were voted down, ensuring The Mancunian will continue to funded and run independently for the next three years.

  3. March 21, 2019 at 7:23 pm

    ah, yes, I see you’ve been reading:

    http://kshatriya-anglobitch.blogspot.com/2014/12/sweets-and-illusions-survival.html

    One of my fertile grounds for recruiting down low white guys, even though the author is a hindu muffin just like you….

    Us gays and wimminz must have the same hateful little brains, nah… we are meaner at the Wolves of Vineland…

    But here’s where your hero Rookh gets it wrong…

    it’s not just anglo puritanism that makes us hate you awful darkies…

    Just look at how many of us in the wonderful LGBTQIT+piesquaredgoogleplex community hate you stinkers…

    And look at how racist liberals are…

    and yes feminism intersects with many of my, ahem, lifestyle interests ™

  4. Conscience Constituent
    March 21, 2019 at 7:26 pm

    Great article.

  5. March 21, 2019 at 7:26 pm

    BTW, will you hindu muffins STOP spreading these horrid memes like us WN spread our asscheeks, It just ain’t reich…

  6. March 22, 2019 at 7:33 am

    Well, this is the reason why guys like Tariq Nasheed even said that feminism is a subsidiary or an extension of white supremacy. While feminism 2.0 (back in the 1960s and 1970s) were about women’s voting, work and sexual rights – plus being fed up with white patriarchy treating women, like blacks, as second class citizens, something happened along the way. Black feminists started barking up the wrong tree not realizing they were being used as catalysts. Because even George Carlin said feminists don’t give a shit about black women’s problems. Truthfully, they don’t care about Asian or Latin women’s problems either. But they will use them to try to emasculate their men for a temporary “upper hand”.

    And yes, I’m familiar with Margaret Sangler talking about aborting black children; anytime any group believes in racial superiority or even ethnic empowerment, putting women on pedestals, pussy begging and “queen worship” comes along with that.

    What you said about the difference between men being thirsty and needy for American women vs. being thirsty for foreign women is grand. Truth be told, foreign men don’t sweat their women like we do in the USA. Even in Southeast Asian or Latin American countries where females may show selfies and half-naked photos, the men don’t appear to be smothering or as pestering. I’ve not only noticed this on Flickr, but even Fetlife, or even FB or IG. Even in some countries where unpaid sex is not frowned upon, they don’t put themselves out there like American women do (which is, at times, just for a tease).

    I have traveled abroad and I can tell that men don’t play “captain save-a-hoe” unless a woman was being attacked (which surprisingly does not happen often) or is actually struggling economically – and even then, nobody is going to ruin another person’s life based on rumors and hearsay like it happens in the USA.

  7. dolph
    March 23, 2019 at 3:50 am

    I’m an Indian American man myself and it’s all coming together over the past several years, thanks to the internet and experience learned by aging.

    Feminism is nothing other than white American woman supremacy. That’s all it is. Whether or not it is promoted by the Jews is irrelevant. Feminism is the white woman saying she is the most precious, learned, progressive, powerful person on earth, despite there being almost no evidence for it.

    Western civilization was built by white men. Not white women. When western civilization was strong, white women were merely the breeders, the wives and mothers.

    Although white women are now trying to uphold their false supremacy on both the men and women of other races, I can see why white men are so pissed off. It must be hell to have attractive women who nevertheless have egos the size of the universe, and refuse to submit.

    • Conscience Constituent
      March 23, 2019 at 6:52 am

      Actually most of western civilization was built by the slave labor extracted from slaves, either working on site or in the colonies, with the products of their labor shipped to the west.
      north europeans and especially the anglos are utter scum,Italians should have exterminated them all during the time of the Roman empire.

      • March 23, 2019 at 7:17 am

        I was just about to post this response. Western “civil-LIE-zation” was built on the backs of slave (black) labor and stolen from Native Americans. So whatever white men are going through with white women or anybody else is their karma, as far as I’m concerned. I could care less about them being pissed off. Whatever they are going through with “their” women is only a glimpse of what’s yet to come and a glimpse of how black men were treated by black women in a matriarchy, since they were the ones who said “the black man is a lowly creature who MUST be at the bottom…”

    • Yusef
      March 26, 2019 at 5:22 pm

      Actually you’re right western civilization was built on the backs of slaves, but it was not always or usually black backs until the USA. You kinda go from talking about western civilization to what happened in the USA as if it was all the same thing. I think though, you’ve left out the possibility of expanding Nearly every people on planet mofo earth have been and have kept slaves. We all have slavery in our ancestry. Blacks kept blacks as slaves before the whites came to Africa, too. Around 200 B.C.E., blacks from northern Africa came pretty close to conquering Rome and subjugating “the whites” there, please note. Another interesting point is that here in the USA, there was the enslavement of whites by other whites. The main difference is this slavery ended in 1776. It is also true the brutality of American slavery intensified beyond belief after 1776

  8. Conscience Constituent
    March 23, 2019 at 3:04 pm

    You left out of this analysis France,another western colonial power that even now still retains it’s colonies and continues to bleed them dry.
    Coherently with your thesis France has a strong feminist movement.

    But noticeably less that USA.

    • Conscience Constituent
      March 27, 2019 at 6:57 am

      Bullshit,in France paternity tests are illegal for the husband/father that is asked/forced to pay for it.
      It doesn’t sound that far behind the USA to me.

    • P Ray
      March 28, 2019 at 8:31 am

      The balancing factor is scarce housing.
      That allows you to do “sex for rent”, and in some other countries like Finland
      “News 2.2.2010 11:16 | updated 31.5.2012 20:52
      Sex for Housing Schemes Legal in Finland
      Each month, at least one landlord who requests sex in exchange for housing is reported to the Central Union of Tenants. Police say the thinly-veiled request for a prostitute is legal if the tenant is an adult and the landlord does not resort to violence or threats.”

      and Holland
      “Driving instructors ‘may offer lessons in return for sex’, Netherlands government confirms
      The practice, known as ‘ride for a ride’, has been deemed ‘legal but undesirable’
      Adam Boult By Adam Boult7:47PM GMT 18 Dec 2015”

      and New Zealand

      Realise that women talk a lot of shit and like to “front” until you bring them to reality by telling them Chad won’t give a damn about them, and at the end of their cock carouseling, all they will have is a enlarged vagina and a brain of mush through the emotional see-saw of endless drama.
      P.S. Telling them that in a calm tone of voice is not abuse, merely stating facts.

      • March 29, 2019 at 8:03 am

        “P.S. Telling them that in a calm tone of voice is not abuse, merely stating facts.”

        Not that telling them accomplishes anything nor will change their ideas an iota.

        Heh…I can’t help wonder, What would poor li’l helpless daughter have decided if the landlord had been a Chad?

        And, instead of self-righteously ranting about this end-of-th’-world broken fingernail, Mommy might have inquired whether Chad had any additional flats available for herself.

  9. March 24, 2019 at 1:26 pm
  10. P Ray
    March 24, 2019 at 7:30 pm

    This anecdote brilliantly captures the emotional toll of having sex with a parent as their child glimpses the act
    Do not watch if you are eating, drinking, operating industrial machinery, guiding a vehicle or performing surgery.

  11. Water Cannon Boy
    April 14, 2019 at 11:42 am

    As mirrored with middle school girls who want to dress like they’re going to the club when the temperature is in the 30’s, and then complain about the heat not being turned up enough, modern prosperity and conveniences make them prone to complain about things being hard for them, because they lack any insight to how things got good or prosperous. And they don’t feel they should have to adjust anything in their lives to adjust to any inconveniences that are not going to be solvable.
    The U.S. and U.K. had the highest economic prosperity. Scandinavia had less prosperity, but thru geographic factors, didn’t have the risks of possible hostile neighbors or at least a neighbor that they would fear could be annoying. Scandinavia hasn’t had many periods of large immigrants moving there. They haven’t been involved heavily in world wars like other countries. They sure aren’t known for causing trouble or for being a risky place to live or to travel to.
    I like to compare it to being a test pilot. If being a test pilot today were just as risky as it was back then, you would not have a women wanting to be test pilots. But not that we have many decades of trial and error (deaths), predictive computer models, flow dynamic research with super pretty multi colored graphics to illustrate pressure zones, you’ll have women seeking to be test pilots and feminist saying see, we can do just as good as the boys and she’s probably better.

  12. al
    June 7, 2019 at 7:33 am

    The connection between feminism and racism is clear. The increase in feminism ALWAYS means an increase in racism…i.e. anti black male – to be specific.

    Look at the corporate work place. Diversity and Affirmative Action have come to mean “White Women hired only” when its point and purpose was for Black men to be hired.

    How many Black men do you see in corporate America ??? the numbers are no different than they were 30 years ago.

    Feminism is merely another form of racism………….

    (black women haven’t figured it out yet)

    • hoipolloi
      June 7, 2019 at 9:37 am

      @Feminism is merely another form of racism…”

      The master stroke was delivered during Reagan’s Presidency when it was declared that white women are a minority; egged by feminism. It was a tragic blow to the colored minorities in America.

  13. P Ray
    July 8, 2019 at 4:22 am

    There are a lot of people who think that many minorities didn’t want to fight in wars because they
    “believed in the sanctity of life and didn’t want to be imperialists” … but they’re not entertaining the other idea
    “maybe the minorities weren’t allowed to join because there was lots of sex in the army, and, gotta keep dem women pure for our own people”
    Plus the other “traditional” idea that:
    “Men exchange love for sex, while women exchange sex for love” … when it’s really
    “Men commit to women they are interested in, while women have sex to men they are interested in”.

    Related: https://imgur.com/pyvsFlG.jpg

    A lot of people don’t want to believe their grandmother was a whore for the guys she was really attracted to.

  14. P Ray
    July 13, 2019 at 6:39 am

    Another interesting take (racist woman hates being messaged by non-White guy):
    http://archive.is/bA5Vi

    Remember … a lot of women are only interested in “men they can show off to their friends”.
    That’s why a lot of men become bullies at work – they desperately require their job so that their cupcake won’t divorce their ass if they wind up unemployed (and they only got her because she was only interested in men with money) … and the only way to do that in the workplace is to backstab men, since they can’t do it to women (would be complained at to HR).

  15. P Ray
    July 20, 2019 at 9:04 pm

    Was it an accident … or a warning? It’s always hard to tell …
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7268089/Slaughterhouse-employee-slits-cows-throat-parking-lot.html
    Shocking moment US slaughterhouse employee chases escaped cow through a DIY store car park before slitting its throat in full view of horrified shoppers
    Dashcam footage shows the employee pursuing the young cow, killing it – then leaving it to writhe on the pavement next to the store in Bloomfield, Hartford County. The grisly video begins with the escaped calf trying to run away from the neighboring Saba meat store, which keeps livestock on site.

  16. P Ray
    April 17, 2020 at 3:29 am

    One reason why a lot of women demand to be equal to men, is so that they get the chance to rate and evaluate men, so that “the women get only the best, with the dregs beings ignored until they are needed when her looks are gone.”

    In a similar vein, had the Titanic not sunk it’s possible the women could think they were being excluded from the men who intended to have fun without them:

  17. P Ray
    May 26, 2020 at 4:48 am

    Strong independent white woman claims black man who asks that she leash her dog is “threatening her life”:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8355729/White-woman-walking-dog-leash-calls-COPS-black-man-asked-on.html
    White woman who hysterically called 911 to report an ‘African-American man threatening her life’ after he asked her to leash her dog in Central Park APOLOGIZES – as she is suspended from her investment firm job and gives up pet
    A white woman has been caught on camera calling cops and telling them an African American man was threatening her life after he simply asked her to put her dog on a leash in New York’s Central Park on Monday. The video sparked calls for her to be fired from her investment firm job and for her pet to be taken away over concerns she was choking it. Amy Cooper, 41, has since apologized and has been placed on administrative leave pending an investigation into the incident which many claimed was a racist attack against bird watcher Christian Cooper, 57.

    Remember when I said earlier the “Karen” syndrome exists, where women treat men they are attracted to with a lot of deference, any other guy that interacts first with her in public outside of a business transaction … will get told “Excuse me, I am going to call the police.”

    Running the world, yo. But can’t take any criticism or advice. So strong and independent that she will call the cops on anyone who disagrees with her lel.

    • P Ray
      May 26, 2020 at 5:11 am

      There is a particular belief that “certain spaces are only reserved for Whites, and any other race of person has to somehow justify their presence there”
      (Experienced it myself in New Zealand, got told because of a fluent grasp of English: “Your English is so good” and “You must be a Christian”)
      I replied, “Your English is so good too, education is improving in the colonies” and “I didn’t realise fluency depended on faith”.

      https://sociology.yale.edu/sites/default/files/pages_from_sre-11_rev5_printer_files.pdf <- this paper, "The White Space" by Elijah Anderson talks about the issue in depth.

  1. April 2, 2019 at 5:50 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: